Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,502 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 598,342
Pageviews Today: 766,374Threads Today: 208Posts Today: 2,588
06:45 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

This is what public school textbooks say

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60337325
United Kingdom
07/22/2014 04:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
This is what public school textbooks say
Earth is 4.5 billion years old
Our ancestors were apes.


Should i believe it? And why?
Idol1
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 60337325
United Kingdom
07/22/2014 04:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: This is what public school textbooks say
After 33 views i guess i shouldn't.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21577450
United States
07/22/2014 04:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: This is what public school textbooks say
Absolutely not OP.

Earth is about 4.54 billion years old and our ancestors were fish. That silly intro level textbook should be thrown in the trash for stopping early instead of going all the way back...
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 60337325
United Kingdom
07/22/2014 04:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: This is what public school textbooks say
Absolutely not OP.

Earth is about 4.54 billion years old and our ancestors were fish. That silly intro level textbook should be thrown in the trash for stopping early instead of going all the way back...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21577450


So who or what was the fish's ancestors then?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21577450
United States
07/22/2014 04:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: This is what public school textbooks say
Absolutely not OP.

Earth is about 4.54 billion years old and our ancestors were fish. That silly intro level textbook should be thrown in the trash for stopping early instead of going all the way back...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21577450


So who or what was the fish's ancestors then?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60337325


Jawless fish. Chordates are the earlier relatives of vertebrates. Silly me. Looks like I didn't go back far enough.
Shoot-Straight Johnny

User ID: 48255378
United Kingdom
07/22/2014 04:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: This is what public school textbooks say
Yeah, it's not like government institutions would lie to you or anything. It's not like they would push the great deception on you or anything. Tell a kid he's an ape and then wonder why he behaves like an animal....what's up with that?
The chariots of God are tens of thousands, and thousands of thousands.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60560600
Philippines
07/22/2014 04:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: This is what public school textbooks say
Earth is 4.5 billion years old
Our ancestors were apes.


Should i believe it? And why?
Idol1
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60337325


cruisecruisecruisecruisecruisecruisecruisecruise
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 60337325
United Kingdom
07/22/2014 04:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: This is what public school textbooks say
Absolutely not OP.

Earth is about 4.54 billion years old and our ancestors were fish. That silly intro level textbook should be thrown in the trash for stopping early instead of going all the way back...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21577450


So who or what was the fish's ancestors then?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60337325


Jawless fish. Chordates are the earlier relatives of vertebrates. Silly me. Looks like I didn't go back far enough.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21577450


keep going
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21577450
United States
07/22/2014 04:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: This is what public school textbooks say
Absolutely not OP.

Earth is about 4.54 billion years old and our ancestors were fish. That silly intro level textbook should be thrown in the trash for stopping early instead of going all the way back...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21577450


So who or what was the fish's ancestors then?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60337325


Jawless fish. Chordates are the earlier relatives of vertebrates. Silly me. Looks like I didn't go back far enough.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21577450


keep going
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60337325


Should I have to keep going? Have I not demonstrated a good enough thread?

Some deuterostome was the ancestor to chordates. Perhaps some sessile organism in the Ediacaran, something perhaps like Ernietta.

Fossilization is rare in soft bodied organisms. It's easier when you can work with mineralized bits.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 60337325
United Kingdom
07/22/2014 04:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: This is what public school textbooks say
...


So who or what was the fish's ancestors then?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60337325


Jawless fish. Chordates are the earlier relatives of vertebrates. Silly me. Looks like I didn't go back far enough.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21577450


keep going
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60337325


Should I have to keep going? Have I not demonstrated a good enough thread?

Some deuterostome was the ancestor to chordates. Perhaps some sessile organism in the Ediacaran, something perhaps like Ernietta.

Fossilization is rare in soft bodied organisms. It's easier when you can work with mineralized bits.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21577450


So what was the first ancestry?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31810309
United States
07/22/2014 04:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: This is what public school textbooks say
...


Jawless fish. Chordates are the earlier relatives of vertebrates. Silly me. Looks like I didn't go back far enough.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21577450


keep going
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60337325


Should I have to keep going? Have I not demonstrated a good enough thread?

Some deuterostome was the ancestor to chordates. Perhaps some sessile organism in the Ediacaran, something perhaps like Ernietta.

Fossilization is rare in soft bodied organisms. It's easier when you can work with mineralized bits.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21577450


So what was the first ancestry?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60337325


Minerals. Life started with a chemical reaction. The first organisms were single-celled.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 55546885
United Kingdom
07/22/2014 10:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: This is what public school textbooks say
...


keep going
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60337325


Should I have to keep going? Have I not demonstrated a good enough thread?

Some deuterostome was the ancestor to chordates. Perhaps some sessile organism in the Ediacaran, something perhaps like Ernietta.

Fossilization is rare in soft bodied organisms. It's easier when you can work with mineralized bits.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21577450


So what was the first ancestry?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60337325


Minerals. Life started with a chemical reaction. The first organisms were single-celled.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31810309


Can it be repeated?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23764026
United States
07/22/2014 10:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: This is what public school textbooks say
...


Should I have to keep going? Have I not demonstrated a good enough thread?

Some deuterostome was the ancestor to chordates. Perhaps some sessile organism in the Ediacaran, something perhaps like Ernietta.

Fossilization is rare in soft bodied organisms. It's easier when you can work with mineralized bits.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21577450


So what was the first ancestry?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60337325


Minerals. Life started with a chemical reaction. The first organisms were single-celled.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31810309


Can it be repeated?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55546885


Can the creation of life be repeated? Yes. Please look into computer science.

If we can create non-organic organisms which function, adapt, and reproduce how is that any different then the creation of other life.

I'll give the ole man upstairs this. It's an incredible system that he created. Imagine the intellect that would be capable of creating a system in which an organism adapts to it's environment, and grows stronger over the course of millennia. Imagine the forethought, the genius!

I always wonder why creationist and evolutionists are at odds. It may be right, it may be wrong it's a theory, but is it a sin to attempt to understand god's works from a christian perspective?

Just because science is pushing our understanding as humans doesn't cheapen the fundamental context of the universe. In fact, the only thing it does is take the wind out of the sails of crooked clergy and gurus who want to tell you that god is magic, and only he/she can tell you why.

The debate over evolution is old, and people usually just use the debate to yell their beliefs louder then others. Instead of considering that there is a middle ground.





GLP