How much longer do y'all think it'll be before they show full uncensored nudity? | |
contrails User ID: 14667087 United States 03/05/2015 04:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58277100 United States 03/05/2015 05:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | well abc shows gay 13 kids making out. schools in texas had kids sign paper saying they wont tell their family what they wrote i bet it had to deal with sex or some other. i would say when they start selling weed at stores if no already |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65793316 Canada 03/05/2015 06:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65074170 United States 03/05/2015 08:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
1-2-Follow User ID: 68488387 United States 03/05/2015 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they already show beheadings and brutal murders, but nudity is where youre gonna draw the line? Thats your last straw? Really? People are so fucking backwards its pathetic Articles and "news" from liberal media shall now be known as catnip for libtards. Truth is schilling in the empire of retards. "Yep but for now we dub you toast guy." - AC520845 *PROCLAIMED PROPHET OF THE DOW* ® Let me know when the climate STOPS changing, then i'll be worried. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 67061407 United States 03/05/2015 08:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65755373 United States 03/05/2015 08:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 62323787 United States 03/05/2015 08:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65755373 United States 03/05/2015 08:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How much longer do y'all think it'll be before they show fully uncensored nudity on regular American television like they do in Europe? And then how much longer before unsimulated sex? Quoting: Dani 64890649 10 years..they will have the bestiality and pedo channels on cable And orgies in the streets from zebras to the Brady bunch While ash falls from the sky slowly like a black curtain And the ice cream trucks make hit and runs And clean water prices is tripped While cloned mutants battles it out live on gladiator stars Perfect intro for a new mad Max movie |
Dani User ID: 65074170 United States 03/05/2015 08:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they already show beheadings and brutal murders, but nudity is where youre gonna draw the line? Thats your last straw? Really? Quoting: 1-2-Follow People are so fucking backwards its pathetic My last straw has been plucked but instead of asking earnestly you made an emotional and rude assumption. But as you mentioned, they already show graphic violence so this is literally the last straw in the once pile to be pulled. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 67732238 United States 03/05/2015 09:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How much longer do y'all think it'll be before they show fully uncensored nudity on regular American television like they do in Europe? And then how much longer before unsimulated sex? Quoting: Dani 64890649 It would be the beggining to solving the problem of hyper sexism and fanatic horniness, psychotic sex craving etc. Covering up and hiding sex on the high shelf in the cookie jar in the safe in the cellar, is a main reason it is so desired and taboo. Look at tribes in africa where the females just walk without shirts on ... boobs arent anything special, boobs arent this magical present that must stay hidden and are a grand reward to see, we faked our selves out psychologically to make it that way... the sooner we show nudity everywhere, the sooner sex and the natural human body loses all of its taboo qualities...but then... maybe sex would slow down in regards to the saying sex sells... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63598079 United States 03/05/2015 09:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65755373 United States 03/05/2015 09:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How much longer do y'all think it'll be before they show fully uncensored nudity on regular American television like they do in Europe? And then how much longer before unsimulated sex? Quoting: Dani 64890649 It would be the beggining to solving the problem of hyper sexism and fanatic horniness, psychotic sex craving etc. Covering up and hiding sex on the high shelf in the cookie jar in the safe in the cellar, is a main reason it is so desired and taboo. Look at tribes in africa where the females just walk without shirts on ... boobs arent anything special, boobs arent this magical present that must stay hidden and are a grand reward to see, we faked our selves out psychologically to make it that way... the sooner we show nudity everywhere, the sooner sex and the natural human body loses all of its taboo qualities...but then... maybe sex would slow down in regards to the saying sex sells... Spot on |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65074170 United States 03/05/2015 09:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It would be the beggining to solving the problem of hyper sexism and fanatic horniness, psychotic sex craving etc. Covering up and hiding sex on the high shelf in the cookie jar in the safe in the cellar, is a main reason it is so desired and taboo. Look at tribes in africa where the females just walk without shirts on ... boobs arent anything special, boobs arent this magical present that must stay hidden and are a grand reward to see, we faked our selves out psychologically to make it that way... the sooner we show nudity everywhere, the sooner sex and the natural human body loses all of its taboo qualities...but then... maybe sex would slow down in regards to the saying sex sells... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 67732238 Hmm, that's the valid point. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 67732238 United States 03/05/2015 09:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It would be the beggining to solving the problem of hyper sexism and fanatic horniness, psychotic sex craving etc. Covering up and hiding sex on the high shelf in the cookie jar in the safe in the cellar, is a main reason it is so desired and taboo. Look at tribes in africa where the females just walk without shirts on ... boobs arent anything special, boobs arent this magical present that must stay hidden and are a grand reward to see, we faked our selves out psychologically to make it that way... the sooner we show nudity everywhere, the sooner sex and the natural human body loses all of its taboo qualities...but then... maybe sex would slow down in regards to the saying sex sells... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 67732238 Hmm, that's the valid point. Yes, isnt it funny that the people who want to cover up the human body think they are doing so to prevent bad things, when really their thought and attitude is the cause of the badness? irony right. They make the human body into something that for some reason cant be seen?...wut...why....... its a fucking body...you eat fucking bodies you idiots... its just a body.... what the rfuckkkk.. stop making it something it isnt...like, it isnt something that needs to be covered, or the end of the world if it is seen nude... it does have sex...thats how we exist you fucking idiots... because this magical amazing body is able to create life... thats bad you say?!?!?1 thats naughty>!>!.1 you fucking idiot???? |
Dani User ID: 65074170 United States 03/05/2015 10:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, isnt it funny that the people who want to cover up the human body think they are doing so to prevent bad things, when really their thought and attitude is the cause of the badness? irony right. They make the human body into something that for some reason cant be seen?...wut...why....... its a fucking body...you eat fucking bodies you idiots... its just a body.... what the rfuckkkk.. stop making it something it isnt...like, it isnt something that needs to be covered, or the end of the world if it is seen nude... it does have sex...thats how we exist you fucking idiots... because this magical amazing body is able to create life... thats bad you say?!?!?1 thats naughty>!>!.1 you fucking idiot???? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 67732238 May I ask how old you are? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 67732238 United States 03/06/2015 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, isnt it funny that the people who want to cover up the human body think they are doing so to prevent bad things, when really their thought and attitude is the cause of the badness? irony right. They make the human body into something that for some reason cant be seen?...wut...why....... its a fucking body...you eat fucking bodies you idiots... its just a body.... what the rfuckkkk.. stop making it something it isnt...like, it isnt something that needs to be covered, or the end of the world if it is seen nude... it does have sex...thats how we exist you fucking idiots... because this magical amazing body is able to create life... thats bad you say?!?!?1 thats naughty>!>!.1 you fucking idiot???? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 67732238 May I ask how old you are? You tell me how old you are first. Then tell me what I said that you did not agree with. Then I will tell you my age. Also if you are asking as a crutch to set up you calling me immature, I just wrote this, and will present it to evidence my maturity and intelligence; Imagine an electron not moving existing in empty space. How is it attached to the EM field? What does the EM field appear like surrounding it? Electrons can never be not moving, electrons intrinsically vibrate, for...no...reason? Imagine an electron intrinsically vibrating in empty space. How is it attached to the EM field? What does the EM field appear like surrounding it? Is the electron just moving in place up and down? How and why? An electron alone in empty space would vibrate...how and why? If an electron alone in empty space could stand exactly still, what would be the minimum quantity of non nothing (substance) that you would have to introduce into the region of this lone electron, to get it to move, thus defaultly produce EM radiation? Once you choose the substance you wish to use, imagine that substance traveling towards the lone electron, planck length by planck length, and keep note of how the substance itself is attached the EM field, and how the EM field appears surrounding it, as it approaches our electron. If the substance you have chosen is producing EM radiation, we can imagine that before the substance physically touches our lone electron, its EM radiation it is producing, which you know how it is appearing surrounding the substance and how the EM field is attached the substance, so you should also know how the lone electrons em field is appearing surrounding itself, and therefore how the substances EM radiation will interact with the lone electrons local EM field. So play by play, we are all carefully watching this event unfold, planck length by planck length, so we get all the details, and we see the substances em radiation heading towards the lone electrons local EM field... and does the substances em radiation interact with the lone electrons EM field? or does it interact with the physical body the electron itself? When the substances EM radiation finally interacts with the lone electron/lone electrons local field; is the lone electron moved in the direction the substance was traveling, and the substances EM radiation was traveling? When a substance is traveling forward is EM radiation produced traveling forward? When the substances EM radiation finally interacts with the lone electron/lone electrons local field; and the lone electron is subsequently accelerated in (what direction?) some direction; where does the EM radiation which caused the lone electron to accelerate, go exactly, how is its path altered, direction altered? And; how exactly does the local EM field surrounding the lone electron respond to the lone electron being accelerated via EM radiation from the substance? In which directions surrounding the lone electron at T exactly prior to lone electron acceleration through T exact instance of lone electron acceleration, does the EM radiation generated from the acceleration of the lone electron propagate? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65793316 Canada 03/06/2015 11:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56819154 United States 03/06/2015 11:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 812002 Puerto Rico 03/06/2015 11:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45576539 United States 03/06/2015 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dani User ID: 1185964 United States 03/06/2015 05:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You tell me how old you are first. Then tell me what I said that you did not agree with. Then I will tell you my age. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 67732238 Also if you are asking as a crutch to set up you calling me immature, I just wrote this, and will present it to evidence my maturity and intelligence; Imagine an electron not moving existing in empty space. How is it attached to the EM field? What does the EM field appear like surrounding it? Electrons can never be not moving, electrons intrinsically vibrate, for...no...reason? Imagine an electron intrinsically vibrating in empty space. How is it attached to the EM field? What does the EM field appear like surrounding it? Is the electron just moving in place up and down? How and why? An electron alone in empty space would vibrate...how and why? If an electron alone in empty space could stand exactly still, what would be the minimum quantity of non nothing (substance) that you would have to introduce into the region of this lone electron, to get it to move, thus defaultly produce EM radiation? Once you choose the substance you wish to use, imagine that substance traveling towards the lone electron, planck length by planck length, and keep note of how the substance itself is attached the EM field, and how the EM field appears surrounding it, as it approaches our electron. If the substance you have chosen is producing EM radiation, we can imagine that before the substance physically touches our lone electron, its EM radiation it is producing, which you know how it is appearing surrounding the substance and how the EM field is attached the substance, so you should also know how the lone electrons em field is appearing surrounding itself, and therefore how the substances EM radiation will interact with the lone electrons local EM field. So play by play, we are all carefully watching this event unfold, planck length by planck length, so we get all the details, and we see the substances em radiation heading towards the lone electrons local EM field... and does the substances em radiation interact with the lone electrons EM field? or does it interact with the physical body the electron itself? When the substances EM radiation finally interacts with the lone electron/lone electrons local field; is the lone electron moved in the direction the substance was traveling, and the substances EM radiation was traveling? When a substance is traveling forward is EM radiation produced traveling forward? When the substances EM radiation finally interacts with the lone electron/lone electrons local field; and the lone electron is subsequently accelerated in (what direction?) some direction; where does the EM radiation which caused the lone electron to accelerate, go exactly, how is its path altered, direction altered? And; how exactly does the local EM field surrounding the lone electron respond to the lone electron being accelerated via EM radiation from the substance? In which directions surrounding the lone electron at T exactly prior to lone electron acceleration through T exact instance of lone electron acceleration, does the EM radiation generated from the acceleration of the lone electron propagate? ^I'm not reading all that. I glanced over it though and will admit I probably don't know the answer. I'm 23. I couldn't tell if you were being serious by your punctuation and overuse of expletives. |