9/11 - WTC - Witness gets close-up of bombs detonating on video, contacts government. How prisonplanet.tv (CIA) was used to finish the story, 5 years

[link to video.google.com]

The story of this video: a witness got a close-up of the moment of the bombs exploding.
The witness contacts the government.
Five years later, the government assigns its web of disinfo site prisonplanet.tv the release of the final part of the film, following the key moment - as the bombs were detonated.

Video was audio dubbed to sell the core lie - that planes were used - and plant the usual web of disinformationtracks - "a military plane", etc.
Note: Only the first thirty seconds after the text introduction is relevant.
I don't need to explain why adding planes to this video, like the government did with the rest of the videos used to prove that planes were used, was out of question in this case, right?
Explained long ago:
9/11 NO planes vs. thousands of eyewitnesses & millions watching TV:* praticability *
[link to www.goldismoney.info]

bombs

bombs

And also why a Boeing didn't hit the Pentagon. That imprint was missing there.

And also why a Boeing didn't hit the Pentagon. That imprint was missing there.


Actually the imprint is there. The Pentagon is built to take a substantial blast where as the WTC was built to handle a crash of a very small airplane like a Cessna 182.

Check this pic out on my blog...
[link to www.ifthisbetreason.com]

Notice on the left of the gaping hole? The wall near the ground? All of that shows damage from the impact of the wing.

Also, if you are going to claim that a plane did not hit the Pentagon, you got to figure out how to explain all of those witnesses.

Oh dear, stormbear, you are apparently one incredibly stupid motherfucker. Have you been listening, you ignorant idiot? Over and over it has been said that the WTC towers were engineered to withstand a Boeing 707 impact, which is about the size of a 757.
Witnesses to the Pentagon impact? Who? A few wealthy or connected individuals that can easily be coerced? I have never actually heard anybody describing the jetliner flying at 400 mph 10 feet off the ground into the Pentagram, although I would like to.

[link to video.google.com]

The story of this video: a witness got a close-up of the moment of the bombs exploding.
The witness contacts the government.
Five years later, the government assigns its web of disinfo site prisonplanet.tv the release of the final part of the film, following the key moment - as the bombs were detonated.

Video was audio dubbed to sell the core lie - that planes were used - and plant the usual web of disinformationtracks - "a military plane", etc.
Note: Only the first thirty seconds after the text introduction is relevant.
I don't need to explain why adding planes to this video, like the government did with the rest of the videos used to prove that planes were used, was out of question in this case, right?
Explained long ago:
9/11 NO planes vs. thousands of eyewitnesses & millions watching TV:* praticability *
[link to www.goldismoney.info]

[link to video.google.com]

The story of this video: a witness got a close-up of the moment of the bombs exploding.
The witness contacts the government.
Five years later, the government assigns its web of disinfo site prisonplanet.tv the release of the final part of the film, following the key moment - as the bombs were detonated.

Video was audio dubbed to sell the core lie - that planes were used - and plant the usual web of disinformationtracks - "a military plane", etc.
Note: Only the first thirty seconds after the text introduction is relevant.
I don't need to explain why adding planes to this video, like the government did with the rest of the videos used to prove that planes were used, was out of question in this case, right?
Explained long ago:
9/11 NO planes vs. thousands of eyewitnesses & millions watching TV:* praticability *
[link to www.goldismoney.info]


How did the evil gubmint manage to alter all the video shot by citizens who posted their clips on the net?

who the FUCK could believe a jumbo jet
hit the pentagram, er, pentagon ??
it would have pulled an impossible turn
(with a flying-school Drop Out), came in at what- 6 feet off the ground, and then
TOTALLY Disintegrated after impact ...
oh - withOUT scaring the goddamn lawn.

PUH LEEEZE

I just do not understand why these people keep denying planes hitting the WTC towers. Too many pictures, too many people seeing ... just too much evidence of those plane imprints.

This can only be disinformation to discredit by association the truth seekers.