NASA Admits Original Moon Landing Tapes Got Erased

...


The Rockets were just like missiles. They launched and either blew up somewhere over the ocean or landed in the sea.

Nobody was actually inside them. Later the apollo Command Modules were dumped into the ocean by plane to simulate the astronauts return.

The later developed "space shuttles " are just glorified glider plans used in a similar manner.

Speaking of simulations, the guidance computer software is just that, a simulation. A cheap video game that runs algorithms and crunches numbers but has no bearing on reality.

...


Except they were observed in orbit and observed leaving orbit and tracked on the way to and from the Moon.

...


Except they were observed in orbit and observed leaving orbit and tracked on the way to and from the Moon.

...

Not significantly different than the original consoles used to launch the space shuttle.
:lcc4::lcc1::lcc2::lcc3::lcc5:
Was that "fake" too?

...


So the shuttle is fake too? Interesting. Also interesting, you can build a copy of the original Apollo guidance computer for yourself...
[link to klabs.org]
You can also run the original Apollo guidance computer software in an emulator of the original hardware and even put it into a physically accurate flight simulator and make it think it's flying to the moon all over again.
[link to nassp.sourceforge.net]
It works. Sure, the computer's not particularly fast, and there's no graphical interface at all, it's all just numbers, but the instructions are publicly available and it really does work for getting you to the moon. It didn't need all the bells and whistles of modern computers. All the heavy number crunching was done on the ground to determine the trajectory needed to get to the moon, all the on board computer had to do was follow the flight plan. Its main job was to determine where it was in space using the star and horizon sightings fed to it by the astronauts (no, the command module was not capable of navigating itself to the moon and back accurately; it needed human visual input) and determine the orientation of the spacecraft based on those sightings so that it could hold itself in specified attitudes and perform burns to reach velocities (measured by accelerometers) specified by the astronauts who were following the flight plan.

old news!. "they were part of a batch of 200,000 tapes that were degaussed -- magnetically erased -- and re-used to save money."

i don't blame NASA or think this is some conspiracy, they just erased the tapes to save money as they were very expensive.

...


Observed by who? NASA, or observatories that require the existence of the space hoax to justify funding.

...


Observed by who? NASA, or observatories that require the existence of the space hoax to justify funding.

...


It's readily admitted that all those stage show props only had the computing power of a pocket calculator.

Just enough to make lights blink and screens turn to give the appearance of doing something.

...


Prove it. They had the power necessary for the job they had to do. Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it didn't work.

...


Yes, that's it, thousands of astronomers all over the world knew it wasn't really there but lied to say it was in order to "justify funding" and not a single one of them leaked a word about their lies before they died. Oh, and amateurs too. Sky & Telescope, February 1970, pg 127-130. Look it up.

...


Yes, that's it, thousands of astronomers all over the world knew it wasn't really there but lied to say it was in order to "justify funding" and not a single one of them leaked a word about their lies before they died. Oh, and amateurs too. Sky & Telescope, February 1970, pg 127-130. Look it up.

...



Yeah if over 100,000 can keep shut on the Manhattan project,

So they see a blurb in the sky. It could have been space junk or some other celestial phenomena, but they are told by the propagandists at NASA and the U.S. government that this blurb is the "Apollo 11 rocket" . Then they parrot what they are told non-the-wiser.

...



Yeah if over 100,000 can keep shut on the Manhattan project, a few thousand Professional observers could easily be brought to do the same.

But let's suppose there was a portion of the observers that were either not corrupt / didn't have a conflict of interest or were amateurs.

So they see a blurb in the sky. It could have been space junk or some other celestial phenomena, but they are told by the propagandists at NASA and the U.S. government that this blurb is the "Apollo 11 rocket" . Then they parrot what they are told non-the-wiser.

...


Also, learn to read. No supposing required.

...

Except that they didn't. The Soviets knew about it before we even detonated the first bomb.
[link to io9.com]
1500 leaks, no biggie. And that's with a more or less sequestered work force. Now try doing that in 29 countries with astronomers all over the world who saw Apollo. Including amateurs. Yeah, good luck.
...

How much experience do you have with satellite tracking? I'm guessing none. No, that's not how it works.

How much easier would this be with a much smaller number of professional observers?

...



Learn to debate. You didn't address this point.

Did the amateurs have detailed visual of a rocket jetting through the sky to the moon or just a blurb of light in the sky with NASA's explanation as to what it was?