Dylann Roof exiting the church photo

Nah, i posted a link that clearly illustrates the concept.

WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT?

You know I saved all of the pictures that was on his facebook page. It all looked like it was taken by a professional camera man in the same day, just changed clothes and locations.

B.S.
If you are talking about this photo...

[link to www.spitzer.caltech.edu]

All the colors are a different shade of orange or red. The light grey background is black.

This is a piss-poor example to try and explain the color change of the pants.
?

Looks like different socks and shoes. Entering church = black socks and dark shoes. At time of arrest = white socks and white shoes.

I miss pretty sure that the reason his black pants look white is because that exit photo is in night vision/infrared.

It looks like daylight in the entrance photo - how long was he in there I wonder?

Didn't he get arrested a few days later?

You sound like a member of the Dogon tribe when first confronted with aircraft. Keep talking, you're proving my point. Either way. Let me ask you this: Why would it matter that he changed his pants?

Dylann was supposedly in the church for about 2 hours. An evening service. I agree, I think the camera night view came on and changed the exposure, sadly.

Why would it matter that he changed his pants?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Where did he hide the pants in the church?

I don't see him carrying a change of clothes with him into the church?

These irregularities compound the lies that need told regarding this alleged incident.

I have infra red game cameras and the photos tend to show shades of grey.

I think it was a bible study class.

Last Edited by gmigriff on 09/18/2015 11:53 PM

Yes, I think you are right.

If he changed cloths in the church then these should be noted in the "evidence list" part of the investigation?

By the way...

Where is the "evidence list"?

Where is the Autopsy reports?

Thread: Autopsy Reports for the Alleged Shooting in S.C.

Where are the crime-scene photos?

With most investigations, things tend to leak out?

Where are the leaks?
?

But you are right, he was there for a long time, given what he eventually did.

Now those are important questions for sure. Much more interesting than pants..

whole thing was BS

Not sure if night cam, but the second photo is clearly blown out. Either that, or the scenic crew painted the door the wrong color for the exit photo.

Ahemagain - bro, I've really enjoyed your input over the years. Almost always on point, but this week... you go back on the reefer?

Either way, get it together, man!

One thing I find interesting about the photo of him leaving the church, is that he still has the gun in his hand. Was he worried that police might already be outside waiting to confront him? Or was he sure he was gonnna be fine leaving a church visibly armed. I hadnt seen the exit photo until now, but i figured he'd stash it back in the manpurse before he split. Dunno.

Something else I noticed...

That plant partially hidden by the column doesn't look the same?

It looks bigger? But maybe due to the zoom?

I don't see a gun in his hand, I see an unidentified dark area near his right hand.

It could be the bag that he had on when he entered?

It isn't a night cam photo, you can see color in his face.

What I would like to know is why the FBI would release this photo that has obviously been degraded in quality and had the contrast blown. The cropping also indicates things in the image they don't want us to see. Like the time stamp.

It's like someone working in the FBI thinks people will just say, "Oh, look. That photo is kinda blurry. Too bad they didn't get the camera focused."

The thing is, for all our jokes about "sheeple ", people aren't stupid. They understand these are digital photos taken with a camera capable of much higher resolution.

I also find it amazing that NO ONE else appears to have reposted the photo. That makes me think the FBI only had it up a short time.

aHEMagain

Last Edited by aHEMagain^2 on 09/19/2015 12:40 AM

You do know your late stage syphilis is untreatable right?

Looked again. And yes, just as likely its the black bag. I kept seeong the tip of his index finger wrapped around the trigger. But just as likely, its the strap of the bag. Fair point.

Last Edited by gmigriff on 09/19/2015 01:02 AM

The dark area on the right shoulder is seen in both entry and exit photos.

It looks like they tried to smudge the grubby shoes he was wearing in the entry photo, and then opted to chop the shoes off on the exit photo?

Shooting 9 people at close range a Moron would likely have some blood on them, especially the shoes?

Why no shoes in the exit photo?

As was 9/11.

Best advice: pay your taxes to lois learner or else.

The second half of the two part exit photo...

It looks like someone took a cell-phone photograph from the screen of a large Television CRT screen.

It doesn't have the clarity of the entry photo?

You can sort of see the television scan lines in the exit photo?

Not so on the entry photo?

Yeah, you think I'm brilliant when you agree with me and think I'm high when you don't.

I guess that is significantly better than the standard response, to call me a shill.

Look, I didn't suddenly get stupider, or high, or shilly. I always am this way. I always post my honest opinion, my best possible analysis at the time. I'm wrong fairly frequently, and whenever I realize I am, I share it and the reasons why.

If I earlier used an over abundance of declarative, conclusive statement's about this issue, I apologize. I did so because I find this photo very exciting. For our community, this should be huge. A GLP exclusive.

There are a bevy of anomalies with this photo. It's very existence is an anomaly. Of course opinions are going to differ about the specifics. And if you disagree with my opinion about the pants, fine. Let's talk about that.

But it pisses me off to no end when people just discount something out of hand, aren't willing to debate the matter, and fire straw men arguments and ad hominem's while they're at it.

aHEMagain

Last Edited by aHEMagain^2 on 09/19/2015 01:37 AM

Hair and shirt are the same colors, and it appears the grey pants has pockets and are loooser fitting that the black legging type pnts.

Where you been gmigriff? Oh, that's right.

Thanks for the insightful reply.



aHEMagain

Last Edited by aHEMagain^2 on 09/19/2015 01:44 AM