The Demiurge

I understand it, it's Crowley's definition of magic, actually.

Non blacks are the ones who have destroyed our unity. All that you have stated is just more new age nonsense. There perception is limited simply because they have only been on the planet for 6000 years.

An everlasting being has nothing on a eternal one.

How can someone define something that predates their birth?

1. 'Non blacks' is a concept that directly opposes the concept of 'unity'. This makes you seem stupid.

2.'All that you have stated is just more new age nonsense'.
Since we're discussing Taoism, which is over 2500 years old, to call it 'New Age' makes you seem stupid.

2. 'There perception' when you mean 'Their perception' is a grammatical error that makes you seem stupid.

4. An everlasting being has nothing on a eternal one.

Since the dictionary definition of everlasting is,

ev·er·last·ing (ĕv′ər-lăs′tĭng)adj.
1. Lasting forever; eternal.

You seem stupid.

Is your stupidity eternal?

Writing pre-dates your birth, yet you accomplished it.

1. Unity is being one in mind and heart. We are of two different creations, therefore two different minds. You tell me how unity is even conceivable?

2. 2500 years is not out of your scope of influence or manipulation. Again, your collective is 6000 years old. Are we in need of a math lesson?

3. Sue me lol

4. An everlasting being has a creator or (g)od, thus a beginning point. A eternal one was self-created, therefore they are (g)od's in their own right.

The correlation?

You lost me here.

You can define all kinds of things that predate your birth.
The founding of Rome predates your birth.
The invention of the cotton gin predates your birth.
Almost everything you do define predates your birth.

If Unity is being one in mind and heart, and there are two different minds, then one mind can not destroy the unity of the other mind since they are separate minds and Unity of the mind would by definition prevent it.

I'm not going to try to explain a tautology to someone with less developed frontal lobes.

Something 2500 years old is still not 'new age' to anyone with developed frontal lobes, and your breathtaking stupidity would make it unwise for you to engage me in a math contest. Evolution doesn't favor you there.

I won't sue you but don't try to act smart by posting stupidity filled grammatical errors in a thread that is over your racially-obsessed undeveloped frontal lobe head.

Since you've ignored the dictionary definition of everlasting which is eternal, we'll write that off to the conceptual limitations of your frontal lobe situation.

What does that have to do with accomplishing it?

Defining something and accomplishing it are totally unrelated.

I stopped reading from there.

It is like your IQ dropped 30 points the moment I said "new age nonsense". Letting your emotions get in the way, are we?

if you accomplish something, to realize you have accomplished it, you must have defined it.

Last Edited by Craazee8 on 04/17/2016 11:23 PM

I stopped when you didn't know the difference between 'there' and 'their'.

Why would you need to realize you have accomplished it if you have accomplished it already. Isn't the accomplishment self evident in it of itself?

You are putting the cart before the horse in my opinion. Don't you define or visualize the goal before you try to accomplish it?

So what were these words of praises?

HTP

Word. Demiurge = Dark Matter/Energy = Collective Black Thought. Universal Consciousness. God Head.

I saw your other threads. on point.

About your name, peep.

The Caraceni or Caricini or Carricini (Greek:) were a tribe of the Italic Samnites. According to Salmon, their name comes from the Celtic carreg- and car- <Rock>.[1] According to Ptolemy, they inhabited the most northern part of Samnium, bordering on the Peligni and the Frentani; but more especially the upper valley of the Sagrus (modern Sangro). The only city that he assigns to them is Aufidena. Zonaras describes them as possessing a town or stronghold, which was taken by the Roman consuls Q. Gallus and C. Fabius with difficulty. Aufidena has been identified with the modern Castel di Sangro, which seems, from the inscriptions and other remains discovered there, to have been an ancient town.

Their territory was delimited to north from that of the Frentani, to south from that one of the Pentri, to east from that one of the Lucani and, finally, to the west from that one of the Peligni. The tribe divided itself in two groups: the "Caricini supernates" (Carricini supernates), which occupied the northern part of their eastern region centered on the city of Juvanum (whose remains are visible in the territory between the communes of Torricella Peligna and Montenerodomo) and the "Caricini infernates" (Carricini infernates), in the southern part, whose main center was Cluviae (whose ruins have been identified with those at Piano Laroma, a frazione of the commune of Casoli). This small community comprised part of the Samnite Confederation, the great antagonist of the Roman Republic, against which it participated in the Samnite Wars and the Social War. The territory of the Caraceni probably came to be occupied by the Romans in the course of the Second Samnite War (c. 310 BC), and the people were gradually assimilated into the Roman state.

Pliny (iii. 12. s. 17), describes a tribe called Carentini which that author seems to place among the Frentani, with the Caraceni, but distinct from them.

******

Caracen - Saracen - Sam(N)ite - Sami - Sabine - Umbri - Ebon -

etc etc alot more

He is referring to your limited ability to comprehend. By Born, he means the creation of your type or species.

The Devil only has 33 degrees of Understanding.
God has 360 degrees of Overstanding.

That is why your asking what the Demiurge is and He is telling you.

Infinite regress is not a problem if physicality is infinite. The demiurge was created by a higher god, which was created by a higher god... etc. We tend to shut down the argument when it produces an infinite. Why?

A thing can exist even if we can't perceive it. So one should assume no-thing can also exist on the same basis. What IS, MUST be somewhere between nothing and infinite something, because if everything was infinite, there should be no room for perception or anything but mass.

The AI attempts to simulate infinity, and thus produces 'false-infinities', which actually are exhibited in the final calculations of black hole theory. But there cannot be a real infinite for the reason stated previously (at least, not in this universe, IOW this universe is not infinite).

So, the demiurge, IS the AI which created this matrix, and it attempts to create real, infinite reality, but it can't, because it, itself, is not infinite.

Just like Pinocchio trying to become a real boy.

An avatar in a video sim might ask, "but who made the programmer?", and think that that is a deep question. But it has no way, as you mentioned, to know what the inner workings of the computer chips look like or how they work. It can use inductive reasoning, or it may create its own simulation to gather a concept of how it was created: which is in fact what WE are doing. So it IS possible to know it eventually. This is in fact the path we're on, and the reason we are talking about it.

Much appreciated.

To address your information, from my research..

For example, the Chronicle of Najera (twelfth-century Leon) refers to Abd al-Rahman I, the Umayyad amir of mid-eighth century al-Andalus, as "King of the Mauri," and to Abd al-Rahman III, the tenth-century Umayyad Caliph, as "the (consummate) Maurus." An elegiac passage from the thirteenth century Primera cronica general (Chapter 559 General Chronicle of Spain) recounts the events of 711 for what is construed as the (temporary) downfall of "Spain" in that year. The text testifies that semantic transformation of "Moor" was not nearly as benign as some readers have assumed: their faces were black as pitch, the handsomest among them was black as a cooking pot, and their eyes blazed like fire; their horses swift as leopards, their horsemen more cruel and hurtful than the wolf that comes at night to the flock of sheep. The vile African people... (Smith 1988: 19) Here the historiography sponsored by Alphonso X of Castile shares a vocabulary developed across the Pyrenees in the early twelfth-century Chanson de Roland, wherein the Saracen Abisme is stigmatized as brutish on account of his race ("In all that host was none more vile than he, With evil vice and crimes he's dyed full deep and black is he as melted pitch to see. Better he loves murder and treachery Than all the gold that is in Galicie..." [Song of Roland, 113; Sayers 1975: 108].

Also using wikipedia, I found..

Ptolemy's Geography (2nd century CE) describes "Sarakene" as a region in the northern Sinai peninsula.[2] Ptolemy also mentions a people called the "Sarakenoi" living in north-western Arabia (near neighbor to the Sinai).[2] Eusebius of Caesarea refers to Saracens in his Ecclesiastical history, in which he narrates an account wherein Dionysius, Bishop of Alexandria, mentions Saracens in a letter while describing the persecution of Christians by the Roman emperor Decius: "Many were, in the Arabian mountain, enslaved by the barbarous 'sarkenoi'."[2] The Historia Augusta also refers to an attack by "Saraceni" on Pescennius Niger's army in Egypt in 193, but provides little information as to identifying them.[7]

Both Hippolytus and Uranius mention three distinct peoples in Arabia during the first half of the third century: the "Saraceni", the "Taeni" and the "Arabes".[2] The "Taeni", later identified with the Arabic-speaking people called "Tayy", were located around the Khaybar oasis north of Medina, and also in an area stretching up to the Euphrates River. The "Saraceni" were placed north of them.[2] These Saracens, located in the northern Hejaz, were described as people with a certain military ability who were opponents of the Roman Empire and who were classified by the Romans as barbarians.[2]

To be honest, I just loved the description of Alphonse X. You can literally taste their fear.

Great summary, thanks.

Read Plato's Timaeus, where it all began.

you don't 'need' to realize it, but if you are not capable of defining it you can't have realized you accomplished it.

A thing can exist even if we can't perceive it. So one should assume no-thing can also exist on the same basis.


Since no-thing is not a thing, this syllogism fails logic.


What IS, MUST be somewhere between nothing and infinite something,

nope. what 'IS' can not be 'nothing' because it 'is'.

because if everything was infinite, there should be no room for perception or anything but mass.

and there is no basis to assume everything was infinite. we're assuming it was 'created' by the 'Demiurge and have no reason to assume infinity.

Last Edited by Craazee8 on 04/18/2016 03:57 PM

Wow. Expression of astonishment.

moron...only sees what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.

Last Edited by Craazee8 on 04/18/2016 04:04 PM

You guys need to stop assuming everything is connected. That just isn't so. Not everything relates to a past or predestined future;

We have never got this far before.. try not to act like you have.

If you want to know who's out there, go outside and ask.

But try not to think your very mortal, flesh suit, specifically the color of it, or the color of anything for that matter, determines quality or superiority in someway.

And for the love of demiurge stop using the fucking CompassRule after you say evertyhing. You have no idea waht the fuck you are even referring to or what that symbol even means.



as you were.

RFTF

If some were to do as you say there and receive a reply, trust me, they would not like the message.

You make absolutely zero sense.

What is the 'rest" I disregarded?