This is no lens flare! It IS the Red Kachina

It will take a lot more than that to convince me. When I see it in the sky with my own eyes.

Guess we'll have to use more sun tan lotion huh?

I feel sorry for the river

I'm not saying that is niburu or anything but if u pause at 1:36 it is clearly not in front of the mountain. it only appears when just above the the mountain in the horizon
Got an explanation for that Astro, or a time when it appears in front of the mountain?

Did you ahhh, eat a lot of paint chips as a kid?

Learn how to spell if you want to be taken seriously.Dumbass wrote rote.

As a fellow believer, I have to say honestly there are WAY better videos than this. If you find ones that are lens flare or reflection flare or a sun dog, then you will get NAILED. Do some research and at least put up a video that cannot be debunked...

Good luck!

It's why Obama and some other world leaders took off to Antartic and Argentina lately. Right now it can only be seen in southern hemisphere.

It's a Hopi prophecy. The red kachina will be behind the twins. When the red kachina takes off it's red cloak it will appear blue. The new world will come. It's the red kachina!

For fuck's sake, read the thread and watch my video.

That was on page 1!

Why are u attacking me? I'm not saying it's a planet or sun..I was simply pointing out that it doesn't come up in front of the mountain at that time. Are you disputing that?

I was on the Iphone, and you know how that is!!
Dumbass????
Thanks..

Oh really? You were ALL OVER this video yesterday and loving on ANYONE who disagreed with me.
Thread: Not the Planet X type!! But this video was awsome!! IT WAS A LENS FLARE??? (Page 7)
Thread: Not the Planet X type!! But this video was awsome!! IT WAS A LENS FLARE??? (Page 9)
So what happened? Suddenly it's not such a great video, but of course the topic is still totally real and there's a second sun in the sky.

As I showed in my very first post on this thread back on page 1, and as quoted since then including on this page multiple times, IT DOES APPEAR IN FRONT OF THE MOUNTAIN ON THE DATE I SHOWED IN MY VIDEO!

THAT is what I have been referring to the whole time! Read the thread!

No need to cuss at me buddy. I politely asked you a question. I DID read the thread but missed your video..my bad, I'm a human so naturally I occasionally make mistakes.I'm watching it now. I realize that you're a adamant about your opinion, but your not going to convince anyone when u cuss at the people who aren't even debating your point.

Go to the date I wrote!!
You can see it clear as a day, It is a lens flare.
End of story!!
Doesn't mean Planet X isn't out there. But this was not Planet X.

[link to earth.nullschool.net]
I think we are just getting half the story involving all this...

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
I would put a % on...Get ready for a big disclosure...

:hug18:

Oh really? You weren't even debating my point? Then why the fuck did you say this?

At 1:36 in my video it clearly appears ON the mountain, not ABOVE the mountain.

Where's the guy who saw that "second sun" or "Planet X" directly overhead? If it's on the horizon one place, it's directly overhead somewhere else at that same time, right?

And science is just another belief system...a cult. The entire belief system is based off the science book-bible indoctrinated into public schools.

No scientist is allowed to investigate or experiment without the bible's theories and formulas as a basis,

It's a sun dog you troll tard... It's behind the hill because it's reflecting off the atmosphere.

I was referring to the 1:36 time stamp in the original video, which is obviously a different day. So on that day the light passed "the finger test."
So was it a non lens flare on that day?...since it passed the test, or do u have a different explanation for that one. Again, I don't believe or disbelieve in this shit...just entertained by it. So stop being a dick and have a discussion like a grown up.

I didn't make the comment about your "wrong opinion" btw

there you go and that is all you need

and you would need not to be in South America only to see

You'd think if it was real a local news channel would have reported on it. Unless Brazil tards be tardin.