|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
NASA - Going to the Moon for REAL this time - so the Chinese don't find out the Apollo landings were faked!
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Halcyon Dayz, FCD |
|
Post Content
|
A couple years ago, NASA made headlines by saying they were going to write a book that would finally and definitively put an end to the Apollo lunar landing doubters. It was on the front pages of newspapers, headlines on t.v. and radio news, and on the talk show circuit. Then a funny thing happened. NASA quietly cancelled the project.
Quoting: Thor's Hamster They told NASA not to waste public funds on trying to educate idiots. But THAT didn't make any headlines.
Quoting: Thor's Hamster Blame the journos.  Oh, really? I suppose you can provide a link for that? Try James Oberg's site. He was the writer NASA hired. If they did then you would just say it's photoshopped, like the shots from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24940156 Surely you're not referring to those images of shadows of...something...on the lunar surface? Ya, those were REAL definitive. lol Case in point. The energy produced by hoaxie-handwaving could power a small nation. [ link to www.youtube.com] (Best viewd in HD.) Regarding the video, I could show a video and post script telling you what things are. Would that necessarily make it true? Absolute garbage. IOW you just added another generation of conspirators to your fantasy. How many people are part of the conspiracy? Everybody but you? If you claim this material is fake you have the burden of proof. Why doesn't NASA simply aim the Hubble Space Telescope at the alleged Apollo lunar landing sites? It has aimed Hubble at other regions on the moon. It's curious that NASA doesn't target the alleged Apollo lunar landing sites with Hubble.
Quoting: Thor's Hamster 1 - That wouldn't produce usefull results, as has been explained to you numerous times. Your failure to grasp this simple fact just demonstrates that hoaxies are ignorant. 2 - NASA isn't the sole owner of the HST, they would have to convince their partners that it would be a worthwhile use of the HST's very expensive viewing time. 3 - As you just demonstrated it wouldn't convince die-hard denialists, NOTHING WOULD. It would be a waste of effort.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
