Berenstein bears .... Mandela Effect Proof

Not even a good photoshop...

OP is just an IDIOT. Show us the top label of the tape. It says Berenstain not stein . The label on side was a typo. BEEN THERE DONE THAT!

Get some work done on those nails OP. I know some Vietnamese who do a great job.

It's not proof of anything, it's proof that berenstein is as much part of this reality as berenstain is

If you can't understand how easy it is to mistake berenstain for berenstein, you're probably also stupid enough to have mistaken berenstain for berenstein, and are now too stupid to acknowledge that you were simply MISTAKEN.

There have been typos, and that forum is a nice example of said typos.

Who's driving the car then? The fucking governor's wife?

If anything is evidence, this forum is evidence. Notice how the most recent comments are spelled stain but the old comments are spelled stein. This is more evidence than the OPs picture of the side of the tape. Show us the label on the top of the tap OP!

AH PHOTOSHOP!

Not Kennedy's car in life picture, Obviously a look alike for photo op. IDIOT!!!

I love it how you are trying so hard. I appreciate your efforts. pay no attention to the blood on the floor or the flowers that jackie was holding in timeline 1. It's easier to just call people an idiot. It's much harder to have an open mind and accept that you are just not experiencing it. Sorry you weren't invited.

Dude I wanted to believe you, as I too thought it was the BerenstEIN bears, but I dug up my old childhood books from nearly 40 yrs ago, and it always was BerenstAIn. There are actual conspiracies, but this isn't one of hem...

Let me explain something to you people quick to yell IDIOT or RETARD or whatever other moronic bullshit.

Please pay close attention, so that i may measure your ability to even have this conversation.

Professional athletes become good at their chosen game, due to muscle memory, which is built through repitition. Can we agree, or is this too much for you to handle? Ok, let us continue then....

The brain works in a similar way. Short-term memory is crap, and only through repitition or powerful emotionally connected events can you store something in long-term memory. Long-term memory is like muscle memory. It's far more accurate and reliable, based on repetitive memories or powerful events. Can we agree on that? This is widely accepted as common knowledge, so lets move on.

OK, so people from my timeline remember 4 people in the jfk car. Why, because we're idiots? No. Pay attention, this is the important part.

Because we've seen 4 people in the car, hundreds of times, and it's been reinforced through movies, pictures and other media. So when we say we're sure, we're fucking sure. Just like you are sure the B comes after A. Many of these "mandela effect" memories were reinforced over hundreds if not thousands of times. How many times do you think i could've seen Fruit Loops in my life? thousands, at the minimum.

So for some moron on the internet to tell me im wrong and im an idiot, well .... that doesn't say too much for you. Open your mind, at least to the level where you could consider this a possibility. Millions of people experience it, so brushing us off as memory deficient morons shows how close minded and numb in the head you actually are. Because even if i wasn't experiencing this, i would still find it interesting.

I don't believe you understand. Just like the alternate reality paradox, if you jump timelines, you should never find proof of your previous reality, because its always been that way in this reality.

So in this reality, it's always been berenstain. The point is that millions of us either remember it as Berenstein or Bernstein. Finding proof of the old timeline, for instance the jfk photos i posted earlier in the thread, these pieces of our old reality are called "residue" which shows an imperfect merging of multiple timelines. They are rare to find, but plentiful. They should not exist, but they do. The only logical answer, is that the merging of realities was not perfect, and we have some leftover pieces that were not overwritten.

Answer the question. If there were 4 people in JFKs limo, who was driving? The governor or his wife? Also, take a picture of the top label of the tape. If you refuse to do this, you are a liar.

How did they miss that one picture then or are pictures of the books immune to the change?

Lol

Dimensions are overwriting each other. Sometimes, the new dimension "forgets to overwrite" certain instances in the old dimension due to their existence in unique circumstances.

Too bad you are terribly wrong. The most recent one i posted was from another copy of the tape that was for sale on ebay. They exist. There are a handful of them left, some of them have berenstein, some of them have berenstain. Sorry to burst your bubble.

I believe you are correct. In the places residue is found, it is in odd places and usually obscured or combined with other things that would make it hard to notice if you were just "scanning" through.

It doesn't look like photoshop to me. I did threshold tests, brightness and contrast tests, zoomed in on the pixelization, etc. If it's photoshop, it's well done. I would like to see the front label though. Any chance at a picture of that, OP?

A secret service agent was driving the car in the 4 person reality. I clearly remember, and many others can attest, that the driver turned towards kennedy before the fatal shot, and the strong theory at the time was that the driver turned and shot kennedy. Of course that is impossible now with 6 people in the car. Originally it was the black 4 seater with just the driver and connelly up front. There is another timeline where it was just the driver as well, and some people report remembering 3 people in the white car. The fun part is that all 3 cars exist, they just happened to take the 6 seater in this reality.

Here's a top shot. Some of the tapes have berenstein on the top, some of them have berenstain. it appears the changeover was imperfect since both copies exist at the same time.

[link to imgur.com]

I'm a believer in the Mandela effect. And thanks for the JFK pics..,awesome finds.

But as far as the human body goes...

We can NOT compare drawings and illustrations as proof of Mandela.

I work in medical and have seen thousands of drawings and illustrations of the human anatomy. But I have also seen millions of radiology, CT and MRI images too,

And there are many different body shapes and sizes. Organs have slightly different alignments and sizes too depending on the body habitus.


So saying anatomy is affected by Mandela makes the whole tic look crazy.

Same thing with geography. We can't compare maps drawn or digitally created by other people.

The whole point of Mandela is remembering your OWN memory compared to current reality.

Anatomy and maps are drawings done by other people..

Yeah except that everyone and probably at least 10 people from 2001 on that thread who mentioned the berenstein Bears spelled it as such. Doesn't sound like much of a coincidence.

They call those artifacts "residues". A convenient loophole to explain anomalies that contradict the premise.

Thank you for your input. You would only remember the old skeleton if you were from that timeline. This coincides with multiple universe theory. Have a look at this photo for instance:

[link to vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net]

This is the current skeleton. In our old reality, we did not have the bottom pointed bone at the middle bottom of the ribcage. we also had more ribs and they were more horizontal, versus in a looped shape. our chest plate was smaller and not in segments, but one piece. We also had a second shoulder bone which is now "gone" and rearranged into a v shaped shoulder bone towards the back of the skeleton. We also did not have the top bone that loops around the spine. We also had a different shape of the ribcage, where it was wider at the top, and smaller at the bottom. It's essentially upside down as it is now.

I know this doesnt make sense to you, but it would only make sense if you were from that timeline.

This gentleman knows what's going on. His name is John Ellis if you'd like to do further research.

[link to imgur.com]

mandingus

it always was Spielberg Bears

I already explained hat I believe in the Mandela effect. So I understand the concept of what is real vs memory vs timeline.


I'm not going to address each of your anatomy points. It would take too long. But a small example...the sternum is made of 3 parts: the manubrium, the body and the xyphoid process. X-ray techs use the xyphoid and the manubrium as landmarks when positioning for an X-ray.

You remember there not being a xyphoid process but your memory is based off a drawing.


With all the anatomy points...you are comparing DRAWINGS.

Each artist will draw their own way. Some will make mistakes. Some leave anatomy out to highlight other anatomy.

Like I said...I've looked at thousands of anatomy drawings. Every single one looks different.

You could take 100 chest X-rays and you will see 100 different shapes and sizes of ribs, lung spaces and heart alignment.

Again. I've literally looked at millions of radiology films. Millions.

Some people actually have a condition called situs inversus where their entire anatomy is reversed.

So bottom line...

Actual anatomy is different for every person.

It's impossible to compare minute shifts in anatomy as proof of anything because every person has different body shapes and thus different layouts, alignments and sizes of their organs and bones.

Where you think certain bones are there or not...that can easily be explained by variations in artist illustrations as well

You make valid points. but your perspective is incorrect because you are considering it as "minute shifts" when in reality to me its a major, shocking change where the overall shape and design is different.

I do believe you. You have tons of experience looking at this timeline's numerous variations in shape and size. But the overall shape of the anatomy, the locations of the organs, but more importantly.... the general consensus on those shapes, which are repeating throughout literature.... these things are drastically different for me.

To further explain, i've done the obvious. At first i was shocked and loaded up google images. My jaw dropped when i scrolled through this odd looking skeleton we have now. This goes beyond minute variations. I should also add that i'm college educated with a masters, a software developer, and i've seen enough anatomy pictures to know when the actual agreed upon anatomy is dramatically different.