NASA lies and the earth is flat.

So the time zones are lies too huh

I think OP's brain is flat.

I predict this thread will self destruct.

Dude, go on an airplane. You can see the curvature for yourself.

200 Lies about Earth is Not a Spinning Ball - by Eric Dumbass.

Posted 100 times before - debunked 100 times before.

.

Space agencies of Russia, China, Japan, etc. confirm NASA on this matter and provide their own proof and evidence, which has nothing to do with NASA.

NASA and every other space agencies in the world. And all astronomers. But in a mysterious way, the flat earthers are telling the truth.

Are you guys even trying anymore?

Trying what?

.

It was DOA.

where does all the crap go then when you flush the toilet ??

1* past this point, really. Please post a video of a flight from Chile to New Zealand. It will prove or disprove your FE.

Here's my argument to flt earth believers. Explain the change of seasons?

arguing with roundtards is about as useful as arguing with liberals

You globers are so fucking stupid and clearly have never researched the flat Earth model, timezones are explained perfectly and actually make more sense on a flat Earth with a local sun not a sun that's 92.96 million miles away. And the only curvature you will EVER see will be from a fish eye lens. There is no curvature, we are shown all cartoon CGI pictures, no real pictures, no north-south round trips, no terra firma planets. We are taught to deny our very senses, our intuition and our common sense. Almost everything we've been taught is a lie. The Earth is flat!

If I had my choice which story to believe in. I choose flat Earth. The other one just way too corny. I like knowing God is close and above me.

Corny child stories about dinosaurs and monkeymen.

^this

a flat earth would all be the same time zone.

I think we can agree that at the north pole Polaris is straight ahead, at a 90° angle to Earth.

I have measured the altitude of Polaris at some other places:
At my place (4050 km from the north pole) it is at an angle of 53.5° above the horizon.
In Naples, Italy (5450 km from the north pole) the angle is 41° above the horizon.
In Yangon, Myanmar (8126 km from the north pole) I measured the angle at 16.8° above the horizon.
And in Galle, Sri Lanka (9320 km from the north pole) it was 6° above the horizon.


Now let's apply some simple trigonometry to calculate the height of Polaris above the north pole.

The height of Polaris in kilometers above the north pole on a flat earth:

At my place (4050 km from the north pole - angle above the horizon = 53.5°) Polaris is 5469 km above the north pole.

In Naples, Italy (5450 km from the north pole - angle above the horizon = 41°) Polaris is 4713 km above the north pole.

In Yangon, Myanmar (8126 km from the north pole - angle above the horizon = 16.8°) Polaris is 2445 km above the north pole.

And in Galle, Sri Lanka (9320 km from the north pole - angle above the horizon = 6°) Polaris is 980 km above the north pole.

So, how high above the north pole is it? 5469 km? 4713 km? 2445 km? Or just 980 km?

Please explain, how you get different heights on different latitudes.

.

How can one see the Chicago skyline in it's entirety across Lake Michigan? The curvature simple math off the ball would not allow this to happen. How can one see around the curvature of a ball?

Hmmmm????

NASA lies but you're still a retard.

DEBUNK THIS : MICKLESON/GALE Mickleson /Morley failed Aireys experiment Sagnac.experiment

Not questioning your math (yet) but how did you determine the distance from those cities to the North Pole for a flat earth map? What was your source?

don' care either way, but your argument assumed independent countries and leaderships...independent of Western banks (nope) and the supernatural forces worshipped and obeyed by most global elites...

Can you see polaris from australia?

More importantly if those are all distances and angles that are actually measured on the globe earth, maybe you can explain which one of those is the true altitude/height of Polaris. Those calculations are actually proofs of your conceptual earth model.

Never been there so don't know for sure. I am not under the impression that globe earthers or flat earthers claim to see Polaris from Australia though

Wrong