Is This Diagram Showing Asteroid Collosion With Earth??? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78192304 United States 08/20/2020 10:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
J-Bird (OP) User ID: 78105483 United States 08/20/2020 10:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Check out the other recent posts, they all look like they're right near the firing line. Crazy! "Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd" - Voltaire THE SMALLEST BITS OF MATTER CAN'T BE QUANTIFIED (MEASURED) TIL FIRST BEING QUALIFIED (OBSERVED), I.E. THE EXTERNAL MATERIAL ONLY "REAL" VIA INTERNAL PERCEPTION. THEREFORE, THE BASIS OF REALITY ISN'T MATTER, IT'S CONCIOUSNESS. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78579124 United States 08/20/2020 10:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72707019 United States 08/20/2020 10:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10390534 United States 08/20/2020 10:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
J-Bird (OP) User ID: 78105483 United States 08/20/2020 10:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 2020 PY2 [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] 2020 PQ2 [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] 2020 QP [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] 2020 PP3 [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] "Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd" - Voltaire THE SMALLEST BITS OF MATTER CAN'T BE QUANTIFIED (MEASURED) TIL FIRST BEING QUALIFIED (OBSERVED), I.E. THE EXTERNAL MATERIAL ONLY "REAL" VIA INTERNAL PERCEPTION. THEREFORE, THE BASIS OF REALITY ISN'T MATTER, IT'S CONCIOUSNESS. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator 08/20/2020 10:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm not familiar with this program but I just clicked on what I assume is the most recently cataloged NEO, looks a lot like it's on a collision course with Earth. Quoting: J-Bird Someone check this out and tell me I'm wrong... [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] Minimum close approach distance of 3.65 LD. Look at the table: [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] The orbit diagram has a specific disclaimer that it's not intended to be used to determinate planetary encounter circumstances. "This orbit viewer was implemented using two-body methods, and hence should not be used for determining accurate long-term trajectories (over several years or decades) or planetary encounter circumstances." |
J-Bird (OP) User ID: 78105483 United States 08/20/2020 10:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 2020 PP3 looks like it misses us by a day [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] "Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd" - Voltaire THE SMALLEST BITS OF MATTER CAN'T BE QUANTIFIED (MEASURED) TIL FIRST BEING QUALIFIED (OBSERVED), I.E. THE EXTERNAL MATERIAL ONLY "REAL" VIA INTERNAL PERCEPTION. THEREFORE, THE BASIS OF REALITY ISN'T MATTER, IT'S CONCIOUSNESS. |
J-Bird (OP) User ID: 78105483 United States 08/20/2020 10:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm not familiar with this program but I just clicked on what I assume is the most recently cataloged NEO, looks a lot like it's on a collision course with Earth. Quoting: J-Bird Someone check this out and tell me I'm wrong... [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] Minimum close approach distance of 3.65 LD. Look at the table: [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] The orbit diagram has a specific disclaimer that it's not intended to be used to determinate planetary encounter circumstances. "This orbit viewer was implemented using two-body methods, and hence should not be used for determining accurate long-term trajectories (over several years or decades) or planetary encounter circumstances." Right on, thanks for the dose of rational analysis. Seems odd they would design it to apparently do what they claim it doesn't. "Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd" - Voltaire THE SMALLEST BITS OF MATTER CAN'T BE QUANTIFIED (MEASURED) TIL FIRST BEING QUALIFIED (OBSERVED), I.E. THE EXTERNAL MATERIAL ONLY "REAL" VIA INTERNAL PERCEPTION. THEREFORE, THE BASIS OF REALITY ISN'T MATTER, IT'S CONCIOUSNESS. |
J-Bird (OP) User ID: 78105483 United States 08/20/2020 10:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | *Double Post* Last Edited by J-Bird on 08/20/2020 10:27 AM "Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd" - Voltaire THE SMALLEST BITS OF MATTER CAN'T BE QUANTIFIED (MEASURED) TIL FIRST BEING QUALIFIED (OBSERVED), I.E. THE EXTERNAL MATERIAL ONLY "REAL" VIA INTERNAL PERCEPTION. THEREFORE, THE BASIS OF REALITY ISN'T MATTER, IT'S CONCIOUSNESS. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator 08/20/2020 10:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm not familiar with this program but I just clicked on what I assume is the most recently cataloged NEO, looks a lot like it's on a collision course with Earth. Quoting: J-Bird Someone check this out and tell me I'm wrong... [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] Minimum close approach distance of 3.65 LD. Look at the table: [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] The orbit diagram has a specific disclaimer that it's not intended to be used to determinate planetary encounter circumstances. "This orbit viewer was implemented using two-body methods, and hence should not be used for determining accurate long-term trajectories (over several years or decades) or planetary encounter circumstances." Right on, thanks for the dose of rational analysis. Seems odd they would design it to apparently do what they claim it doesn't. It's just to show the general shape of the orbit, but it's using two body methods. A proper n-body simulation would take far more processing power and slow down your browser. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77743250 United States 08/20/2020 10:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ReoX User ID: 60905172 Malaysia 08/20/2020 10:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76058217 United States 08/20/2020 11:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm not familiar with this program but I just clicked on what I assume is the most recently cataloged NEO, looks a lot like it's on a collision course with Earth. Quoting: J-Bird Someone check this out and tell me I'm wrong... [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] Why worry about something you have no control over. At this point, if an asteroid does hit Earth, we deserve it. Just Mother Nature telling us to GET THE FUCK OUT!!!! lol |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79229000 Philippines 08/20/2020 11:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm not familiar with this program but I just clicked on what I assume is the most recently cataloged NEO, looks a lot like it's on a collision course with Earth. Quoting: J-Bird Someone check this out and tell me I'm wrong... [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] Minimum close approach distance of 3.65 LD. Look at the table: [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] The orbit diagram has a specific disclaimer that it's not intended to be used to determinate planetary encounter circumstances. "This orbit viewer was implemented using two-body methods, and hence should not be used for determining accurate long-term trajectories (over several years or decades) or planetary encounter circumstances." Right on, thanks for the dose of rational analysis. Seems odd they would design it to apparently do what they claim it doesn't. It's just to show the general shape of the orbit, but it's using two body methods. A proper n-body simulation would take far more processing power and slow down your browser. Astro, if you found an imminent spacial threat to earth, will you post it in glp or choose not say a word? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79272169 United Kingdom 08/20/2020 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77606890 United States 08/20/2020 12:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5957191 United Kingdom 08/20/2020 12:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Cap’n Obvious User ID: 40653740 United States 08/20/2020 12:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny how you guys think the government will actually tell us when doom is about to hit us. Just follow closely at what they are doing, not what they say. Quoting: ReoX My theory as well... if they were to actually project a hit, people would have gone crazy all over the globe the minute it did. This software tool is available on the internet for purely entertainment purposes. The real one, with the accurate information, is not available for us peons to see. Have a nice day = GFY. GFY = Go Fuck Yourself. If this offends you then have a nice day. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator 08/20/2020 12:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Astromut Minimum close approach distance of 3.65 LD. Look at the table: [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] The orbit diagram has a specific disclaimer that it's not intended to be used to determinate planetary encounter circumstances. "This orbit viewer was implemented using two-body methods, and hence should not be used for determining accurate long-term trajectories (over several years or decades) or planetary encounter circumstances." Right on, thanks for the dose of rational analysis. Seems odd they would design it to apparently do what they claim it doesn't. It's just to show the general shape of the orbit, but it's using two body methods. A proper n-body simulation would take far more processing power and slow down your browser. Astro, if you found an imminent spacial threat to earth, will you post it in glp or choose not say a word? Of course. 2018 VP1 has a small but non-zero chance of impacting in November. [link to cneos.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] It's also only a few meters wide, so it's hard to call it a "threat" really. If it hits it'll break up in the atmosphere and leave some small meteorites on the ground below. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator 08/20/2020 12:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny how you guys think the government will actually tell us when doom is about to hit us. Just follow closely at what they are doing, not what they say. Quoting: ReoX My theory as well... if they were to actually project a hit, people would have gone crazy all over the globe the minute it did. This software tool is available on the internet for purely entertainment purposes. The real one, with the accurate information, is not available for us peons to see. Bullshit. Amateurs help contribute the data to refine the orbit. I'm tired of the narrative that astronomers are all lying to you. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79255924 Belgium 08/20/2020 12:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79262036 United States 08/20/2020 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79255924 Belgium 08/20/2020 12:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny how you guys think the government will actually tell us when doom is about to hit us. Just follow closely at what they are doing, not what they say. Quoting: ReoX My theory as well... if they were to actually project a hit, people would have gone crazy all over the globe the minute it did. This software tool is available on the internet for purely entertainment purposes. The real one, with the accurate information, is not available for us peons to see. Bullshit. Amateurs help contribute the data to refine the orbit. I'm tired of the narrative that astronomers are all lying to you. Hi Astro, Good to see you haven't given up on the spacetards :) However i know it is august .. but don't we have a increase in near earth misses ? And when will we go trough that astroid debris field ? I remember this being a big talking subject in the 90's. Just want to hear your input. Thanks, |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78105935 United States 08/20/2020 12:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm not familiar with this program but I just clicked on what I assume is the most recently cataloged NEO, looks a lot like it's on a collision course with Earth. Quoting: J-Bird Someone check this out and tell me I'm wrong... [link to ssd.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] Why worry about something you have no control over. At this point, if an asteroid does hit Earth, we deserve it. Just Mother Nature telling us to GET THE FUCK OUT!!!! lol you deserve it |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator 08/20/2020 12:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny how you guys think the government will actually tell us when doom is about to hit us. Just follow closely at what they are doing, not what they say. Quoting: ReoX My theory as well... if they were to actually project a hit, people would have gone crazy all over the globe the minute it did. This software tool is available on the internet for purely entertainment purposes. The real one, with the accurate information, is not available for us peons to see. Bullshit. Amateurs help contribute the data to refine the orbit. I'm tired of the narrative that astronomers are all lying to you. Hi Astro, Good to see you haven't given up on the spacetards :) However i know it is august .. but don't we have a increase in near earth misses ? And when will we go trough that astroid debris field ? WHAT debris field? People claiming bullshit on YouTube doesn't make it so. Here's a chart showing the number of fireballs detected by ASGARD for the last 3 years. I see no sign of a secular increase. We are still coming down off the tail end of the perseid shower: [link to drive.google.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33759523 Canada 08/20/2020 12:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: J-Bird Right on, thanks for the dose of rational analysis. Seems odd they would design it to apparently do what they claim it doesn't. It's just to show the general shape of the orbit, but it's using two body methods. A proper n-body simulation would take far more processing power and slow down your browser. Astro, if you found an imminent spacial threat to earth, will you post it in glp or choose not say a word? Of course. 2018 VP1 has a small but non-zero chance of impacting in November. [link to cneos.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] It's also only a few meters wide, so it's hard to call it a "threat" really. If it hits it'll break up in the atmosphere and leave some small meteorites on the ground below. Could you please elaborate on this:2018 VP1 has a small but non-zero chance of impacting in November. The numbers are conflicted if you look close. And the 2020QG bullshit about from direction of the sun/ couldn’t see it. Small is why,they missed it. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator 08/20/2020 12:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Astromut It's just to show the general shape of the orbit, but it's using two body methods. A proper n-body simulation would take far more processing power and slow down your browser. Astro, if you found an imminent spacial threat to earth, will you post it in glp or choose not say a word? Of course. 2018 VP1 has a small but non-zero chance of impacting in November. [link to cneos.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)] It's also only a few meters wide, so it's hard to call it a "threat" really. If it hits it'll break up in the atmosphere and leave some small meteorites on the ground below. Could you please elaborate on this:2018 VP1 has a small but non-zero chance of impacting in November. The numbers are conflicted if you look close. No they aren't. It's like I said, there's a small but non-zero chance of impact in November. |
bTx User ID: 43056404 United States 08/20/2020 12:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
JoeNobHead User ID: 79170741 United States 08/20/2020 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Check out the other recent posts, they all look like they're right near the firing line. Crazy! Quoting: J-Bird Did you not notice it's orbital period? Do you not know how to roll the mouse wheel and look closer? FFS. you probably didn't even look at it's lunar distance either. I believe in science NOT religion. Giving me bad karma for that, is anti-religious (you're passing judgement) I am just a man. Of no significance. Who found religion to be full of lies, and wrong doing, conflicted teachings I understand microwave communications. I do not stand for the NWO, it sucks. |