The X51 Antigravity Rotorless Helicopter

I have to wonder, if that was a real antigravity machine, why would it have a “tail”?

The tail on helicopters hold a small rotor to stop the turning motion caused on the body by the main rotors (if you take them out, the helicopter starts spinning).

It's not a helicopter it's a "photo-shopper."

I have to wonder, if that was a real antigravity machine, why would it have a “tail”?

The tail on helicopters hold a small rotor to stop the turning motion caused on the body by the main rotors (if you take them out, the helicopter starts spinning).

I have to wonder, if that was a real antigravity machine, why would it have a “tail”?

The tail on helicopters hold a small rotor to stop the turning motion caused on the body by the main rotors (if you take them out, the helicopter starts spinning).



This is actually a great idea, thats why i'm sure it exists somewhere. it has a tail so it can still operate in public view even though its not needed. since the propeller on a typical heli is almost impossible to see or notice anyway, replacing the rotor with anti gravity makes it ideal for those emergencies when it has to be used where an average joe would see it.. but not think twice!

i have no doubt such a device exists, but that totally looks like a photoCHOP.. and i'm not even a graphics/art buff.

plus the homepage and other parts of the site look too sketchy and cheezey.

I have to wonder, if that was a real antigravity machine, why would it have a “tail”?

The tail on helicopters hold a small rotor to stop the turning motion caused on the body by the main rotors (if you take them out, the helicopter starts spinning).

The tail rotor and tail is to counter torque and for steering, without them it hinders and prevents auto-rotation, in the event of engine failure, leading to a crash.

It further appears, in this photo, that the intake ducts/ cowling's are in place for a jet engine.

It also appears that the exhaust port is in place, for a jet engine.

It looks like a bad photo shop photo to me.......LEGION

I wunder if it flys at Mach 100 and can turn on a dime as well as enter and exit the atmosphere at will , and travel to Mars?

It's not a helicopter it's a "photo-shopper."

The tail rotor and tail is to counter torque and for steering, without them it hinders and prevents auto-rotation, in the event of engine failure, leading to a crash.

It further appears, in this photo, that the intake ducts/ cowling's are in place for a jet engine.

It also appears that the exhaust port is in place, for a jet engine.

It looks like a bad photo shop photo to me.......LEGION



The photo is useless in trying to prove anything. Unless we see a photo or even better, footage of this flying, all reasonable theories are fair game. Jet engine cowl, or some contraption to protect the rotary engine while a propeller is absent are all good.

However, my biggest gripe is with the people claiming "this is photoshop." I've used photoshop extensively both professionally and personally over the past 10 years, and I let me tell you, if the photo (see link at top of thread )is photoshop, it's a flawless job, and of all the theories, it's at the top of the least likely.
I would theorize this image could have been leaked with the intended purpose to be used as a red herring and for disinformation purposes.

If this is truly anti-gravity (or a machine that generates it's own gravitational field and counters earth's own) your point about the tail rotor is likely irrelevant as it would probably then be for show, as a previous commenter mentioned.

I know for a fact objects that defy the laws of thermodynamics do exist and are in our skies on a daily basis (often seen amidst the "chemtrails"/persistent contrails), the existing and growing plethora of documented cases and my own numerous personal experiences have given me this truth and I wouldn't waste the time to debate it.

Having said that, my mind is open to your ideas and others, but definately not Photoshop, lol.

The tail rotor and tail is to counter torque and for steering, without them it hinders and prevents auto-rotation, in the event of engine failure, leading to a crash.

It further appears, in this photo, that the intake ducts/ cowling's are in place for a jet engine.

It also appears that the exhaust port is in place, for a jet engine.

It looks like a bad photo shop photo to me.......LEGION



The photo is useless in trying to prove anything. Unless we see a photo or even better, footage of this flying, all reasonable theories are fair game. Jet engine cowl, or some contraption to protect the rotary engine while a propeller is absent are all good.

However, my biggest gripe is with the people claiming "this is photoshop." I've used photoshop extensively both professionally and personally over the past 10 years, and I let me tell you, if the photo (see link at top of thread )is photoshop, it's a flawless job, and of all the theories, it's at the top of the least likely.
I would theorize this image could have been leaked with the intended purpose to be used as a red herring and for disinformation purposes.

If this is truly anti-gravity (or a machine that generates it's own gravitational field and counters earth's own) your point about the tail rotor is likely irrelevant as it would probably then be for show, as a previous commenter mentioned.

I know for a fact objects that defy the laws of thermodynamics do exist and are in our skies on a daily basis (often seen amidst the "chemtrails"/persistent contrails), the existing and growing plethora of documented cases and my own numerous personal experiences have given me this truth and I wouldn't waste the time to debate it.

Having said that, my mind is open to your ideas and others, but definately not Photoshop, lol.

OK boys and girls...

there is a part of that heli in the picture that was cut trimmed and pasted 3 (THREE) times via photoshop.

50 tricky dick fun bucks to the first person to point it out

oh yeah the red x-51 is done awful!