I can no longer ignore, in good conscience, Matthew using a mistranslation of Isaiah 7:14 to proclaim the virgin birth

Genesis. Seed of the woman.




Woman is Mary.



Seed is Jesus.





No mention of Man because it was God.

Jesus was prophesied in the literal first Book.



Crazy

Jesus Called Mary 'Women' at the wedding when she asked for more wine..



Deep stuff.



Bible is 100000% perfect and God's Word

Here's the entry for "John" (John the Baptist) from the "Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology":

JOHN (Ἰωάννης), surnamed the Baptist, one of the greatest among the prophets, who is also honored by Mahometans as a true believer.

He was the son of Zacharias and Elizabeth, and a relative of our Savior, whose way he prepared by his preaching in the wilderness and baptism in the Jordan, whence he was called the Baptist or the dipper. (Matt. iii. 4, 5; John i. 19, &c.)

The time and place of his birth and death are not certainly known. The place of his birth is said to have been a little town in the mountains of Judaea, four miles from Jerusalem, which has received his name; but some modern travelers fix it at Ambaa, a town in the mountains of Judah, six hours' journey from Jerusalem.

In the Gospel of John, there is a story about a wedding at Cana, where Jesus and his disciples were invited. When the wine ran out, Mary asked Jesus to help. Jesus initially replied, "Woman, what does your concern have to do with me? My hour has not yet come." (John 2:4) Despite this, Jesus went on to perform his first miracle, turning water into wine.

OP, you stupid!

People of the BIBLE COMMONLY USE

THE SAME BIBLE QUOTES APPLIED

to different times and DIFFERENT PEOPLE.

Get a clue and put a wrinkle in your brain,

You CROME DOME!

of course it is !!! For the same exact reasons that the coming eclipse of 4/8/24 is prophetical!!!

It's all based on scientific mathematics.

Based on the biblical account of the crucifixion and other historical sources, some scholars believe that the event occurred on April 3, 33 CE. This date is consistent with a lunar eclipse that occurred on April 3, 33 CE, which would explain the darkness that reportedly occurred during the crucifixion.

Battle of the Eclipse: May 28, 585 BCE (Thales of Miletus predicted a solar eclipse, ending a battle between the Lydians and the Medes)

Crucifixion of Jesus: April 3, 33 CE (lunar eclipse)
Julius Caesar's invasion of Britain: August 26, 55 BCE (solar eclipse)

Founding of Rome: April 21, 753 BCE (solar eclipse)
Death of Herod the Great: January 10, 1 BCE (lunar eclipse)

Birth of Confucius: September 28, 551 BCE (solar eclipse)

Sacking of Thebes: August 14, 404 BCE (solar eclipse)

Battle of Pydna: June 22, 168 BCE (lunar eclipse)

Death of Alexander the Great: June 10, 323 BCE (lunar eclipse)

No, does not explain, because a lunar eclipse does not cause darkness. It blocks out the light of the moon and can only be seen taking place after dark when the moon is shining.
It would have to be a solar eclipse that causes darkness during the day, like we will see on April 8.