Same Sex Marriage could move forward in New York, Maryland and Rhode Island | |
gamerprincess81 (OP) User ID: 1033168 United States 01/22/2011 07:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Thoughtful_Hobbit User ID: 1085489 United States 01/22/2011 07:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | not happening, nobody really cares here even the dems. We have bigger fish to fry anyway. "when bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle." -- Edmund Burke "My relative went to Jihad and all he got was Hellfire!" "It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." –- Samuel Adams "Are all the women in New Zealand this hot? I might have to move to the world of hobbits." :THobbit: :THBomb: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 975400 United States 01/22/2011 07:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BRIEF AND TO THE POINT User ID: 1220677 United States 01/22/2011 07:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hell yeah, let all the fags fuck each other;More pussy for me...However, I will not stand for redefining marriage. Marriage is between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, all else is just fuck'n in the woods... Poor people do poor people things, and rich people do rich people things. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it! when you rob Paul to give to Peter ... ... ... you will always get Peters support! :Brieffromnativea: |
ajk User ID: 1114631 United States 01/22/2011 07:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hell yeah, let all the fags fuck each other;More pussy for me...However, I will not stand for redefining marriage. Marriage is between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, all else is just fuck'n in the woods... Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINTHow loving of you...... No one is perfect. A babe before walking will first stumble and fall many times but NEVER gives up until he succeeds. Always remember, ultimately, to never follow any person's belief. Your relationship with God is between you and God. If nothing else, remember this: religion = subservience, control and conformity, the same template as EVERY government "Most believers would kill truth if truth threatened their religion." L. K. Washburn "This crime called blasphemy was invented by priests for the purpose of defending doctrines not able to take care of themselves." Robert Ingersoll "If anyone wants to know how God feels, it's a warm light as if the sun is poking through dark clouds and lifting your spirits with pure joy." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 252372 United States 01/22/2011 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hell yeah, let all the fags fuck each other;More pussy for me...However, I will not stand for redefining marriage. Marriage is between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, all else is just fuck'n in the woods... Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINTCorrection: Marriage is between one man and one woman AT A TIME, PLUS all the girlfriends and boyfriends on the side. ...until DIVORCE do us part. |
BRIEF AND TO THE POINT User ID: 1220677 United States 01/22/2011 07:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hell yeah, let all the fags fuck each other;More pussy for me...However, I will not stand for redefining marriage. Marriage is between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, all else is just fuck'n in the woods... Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINTHow loving of you...... They can pervert nature all they want, I just don't want to hear about it...I don't go around yelling about how great my heterosexuality is, and I won't stand for the redefinition of marriage. If we redefine marriage we start down the slippery slope...next is marriage to dogs and cats...where do you draw the line? Where do you draw the line? Man and man? Man and dog? Man and child? Where? Poor people do poor people things, and rich people do rich people things. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it! when you rob Paul to give to Peter ... ... ... you will always get Peters support! :Brieffromnativea: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1239733 Germany 01/22/2011 07:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BRIEF AND TO THE POINT User ID: 1220677 United States 01/22/2011 07:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hell yeah, let all the fags fuck each other;More pussy for me...However, I will not stand for redefining marriage. Marriage is between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, all else is just fuck'n in the woods... Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINTCorrection: Marriage is between one man and one woman AT A TIME, PLUS all the girlfriends and boyfriends on the side. ...until DIVORCE do us part. People fuck up everything, but we don't have to encourage it... Poor people do poor people things, and rich people do rich people things. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it! when you rob Paul to give to Peter ... ... ... you will always get Peters support! :Brieffromnativea: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 252372 United States 01/22/2011 07:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hell yeah, let all the fags fuck each other;More pussy for me...However, I will not stand for redefining marriage. Marriage is between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, all else is just fuck'n in the woods... Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINTHow loving of you...... They can pervert nature all they want, I just don't want to hear about it...I don't go around yelling about how great my heterosexuality is, and I won't stand for the redefinition of marriage. If we redefine marriage we start down the slippery slope...next is marriage to dogs and cats...where do you draw the line? Where do you draw the line? Man and man? Man and dog? Man and child? Where? We draw the line at "consenting adults". Is that really so hard to grasp? Why can't a man have has many wives and concubines as he can afford to support? Why can't a woman have as many husbands and consorts as she can afford to support? Why should anyone's "religious belief" be bound to others of other "faiths" and "belief" systems? |
BRIEF AND TO THE POINT User ID: 1220677 United States 01/22/2011 07:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hell yeah, let all the fags fuck each other;More pussy for me...However, I will not stand for redefining marriage. Marriage is between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, all else is just fuck'n in the woods... Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINTHow loving of you...... They can pervert nature all they want, I just don't want to hear about it...I don't go around yelling about how great my heterosexuality is, and I won't stand for the redefinition of marriage. If we redefine marriage we start down the slippery slope...next is marriage to dogs and cats...where do you draw the line? Where do you draw the line? Man and man? Man and dog? Man and child? Where? We draw the line at "consenting adults". Is that really so hard to grasp? Why can't a man have has many wives and concubines as he can afford to support? Why can't a woman have as many husbands and consorts as she can afford to support? Why should anyone's "religious belief" be bound to others of other "faiths" and "belief" systems? It's not religious and it's not about consenting...it is simply about the State recognizing marriage, and marriage IS:One Man and One woman...anything else starts us down the slippery slope... Poor people do poor people things, and rich people do rich people things. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it! when you rob Paul to give to Peter ... ... ... you will always get Peters support! :Brieffromnativea: |
gamerprincess81 (OP) User ID: 1033168 United States 01/22/2011 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hell yeah, let all the fags fuck each other;More pussy for me...However, I will not stand for redefining marriage. Marriage is between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, all else is just fuck'n in the woods... Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINTHow loving of you...... They can pervert nature all they want, I just don't want to hear about it...I don't go around yelling about how great my heterosexuality is, and I won't stand for the redefinition of marriage. If we redefine marriage we start down the slippery slope...next is marriage to dogs and cats...where do you draw the line? Where do you draw the line? Man and man? Man and dog? Man and child? Where? I personally think the definition of marriage should be between two consenting ADULTS....Regardless of gender. If that is what makes two people happy, and those people share a strong bond and immense love for one another, who are they hurting?? NO one! And lets face it, the world is overpopulated. Most same sex couple adopt children that are unwanted in other parts of the world, or even our own country. Those children often have everything they need and are loved very much. Those children grow up to be tolerant and accepting of everyone, which is how it should be in the world, but sadly isn't. In my eyes, they are doing a lot of good in the world. Haters will be haters. Keep on hating. Last Edited by gamerprincess81 on 01/22/2011 08:01 PM :gp81: "Staring down the hole again. Hands upon my back again. Survival is my only friend. Terrified of what may come.." PS3- PollyPlssyPants XBL- gamerprincss420 |
Nikki_LaVey User ID: 1120752 United States 01/22/2011 08:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
jonniequest User ID: 1239224 United Kingdom 01/22/2011 08:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
timko User ID: 1206047 United States 01/22/2011 08:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 252372 United States 01/22/2011 08:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hell yeah, let all the fags fuck each other;More pussy for me...However, I will not stand for redefining marriage. Marriage is between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, all else is just fuck'n in the woods... Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINTCorrection: Marriage is between one man and one woman AT A TIME, PLUS all the girlfriends and boyfriends on the side. ...until DIVORCE do us part. People fuck up everything, but we don't have to encourage it... Well HETEROSEXUALS should have thought of that before THEY decided to throw out the "sanctity of marriage", and "until death us do part", by fornicating and co-habitating BEFORE "marriage" and not wanting the law to do anything about it. Then HETEROSEXUALS started cheating on their spouses and divorcing and remarrying before the ex was dead. Then HETEROSEXUALS started using birth-control and getting abortions. and now that the slippery slope has made it all the way to same-sex "marriage", HETEROSEXUALS want to be all holier than thou and start screaming "the sanctity of marriage" crap. |
gamerprincess81 (OP) User ID: 1033168 United States 01/22/2011 08:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: ajkHow loving of you...... They can pervert nature all they want, I just don't want to hear about it...I don't go around yelling about how great my heterosexuality is, and I won't stand for the redefinition of marriage. If we redefine marriage we start down the slippery slope...next is marriage to dogs and cats...where do you draw the line? Where do you draw the line? Man and man? Man and dog? Man and child? Where? We draw the line at "consenting adults". Is that really so hard to grasp? Why can't a man have has many wives and concubines as he can afford to support? Why can't a woman have as many husbands and consorts as she can afford to support? Why should anyone's "religious belief" be bound to others of other "faiths" and "belief" systems? It's not religious and it's not about consenting...it is simply about the State recognizing marriage, and marriage IS:One Man and One woman...anything else starts us down the slippery slope... Yes, well that is because of our founding fathers and religion at the time, which was a driving force in how the Constitution was written. We are in different times now. People evolve and change and polices need to change too. :gp81: "Staring down the hole again. Hands upon my back again. Survival is my only friend. Terrified of what may come.." PS3- PollyPlssyPants XBL- gamerprincss420 |
gamerprincess81 (OP) User ID: 1033168 United States 01/22/2011 08:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hell yeah, let all the fags fuck each other;More pussy for me...However, I will not stand for redefining marriage. Marriage is between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, all else is just fuck'n in the woods... Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINTCorrection: Marriage is between one man and one woman AT A TIME, PLUS all the girlfriends and boyfriends on the side. ...until DIVORCE do us part. People fuck up everything, but we don't have to encourage it... Well HETEROSEXUALS should have thought of that before THEY decided to throw out the "sanctity of marriage", and "until death us do part", by fornicating and co-habitating BEFORE "marriage" and not wanting the law to do anything about it. Then HETEROSEXUALS started cheating on their spouses and divorcing and remarrying before the ex was dead. Then HETEROSEXUALS started using birth-control and getting abortions. and now that the slippery slope has made it all the way to same-sex "marriage", HETEROSEXUALS want to be all holier than thou and start screaming "the sanctity of marriage" crap. :gp81: "Staring down the hole again. Hands upon my back again. Survival is my only friend. Terrified of what may come.." PS3- PollyPlssyPants XBL- gamerprincss420 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1058213 United States 01/22/2011 08:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hell yeah, let all the fags fuck each other;More pussy for me...However, I will not stand for redefining marriage. Marriage is between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, all else is just fuck'n in the woods... Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINT |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1237903 Australia 01/22/2011 08:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Nikki_LaVey User ID: 1120752 United States 01/22/2011 08:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 252372 United States 01/22/2011 08:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: ajkHow loving of you...... They can pervert nature all they want, I just don't want to hear about it...I don't go around yelling about how great my heterosexuality is, and I won't stand for the redefinition of marriage. If we redefine marriage we start down the slippery slope...next is marriage to dogs and cats...where do you draw the line? Where do you draw the line? Man and man? Man and dog? Man and child? Where? We draw the line at "consenting adults". Is that really so hard to grasp? Why can't a man have has many wives and concubines as he can afford to support? Why can't a woman have as many husbands and consorts as she can afford to support? Why should anyone's "religious belief" be bound to others of other "faiths" and "belief" systems? It's not religious and it's not about consenting...it is simply about the State recognizing marriage, and marriage IS:One Man and One woman...anything else starts us down the slippery slope... The STATE has no business defining "marriage" as between one man and one woman. That is respecting the christian religion and disrespecting judaism and islam, and pagans, and atheists, etc |
BRIEF AND TO THE POINT User ID: 1220677 United States 01/22/2011 08:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hell yeah, let all the fags fuck each other;More pussy for me...However, I will not stand for redefining marriage. Marriage is between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, all else is just fuck'n in the woods... Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINTHow loving of you...... They can pervert nature all they want, I just don't want to hear about it...I don't go around yelling about how great my heterosexuality is, and I won't stand for the redefinition of marriage. If we redefine marriage we start down the slippery slope...next is marriage to dogs and cats...where do you draw the line? Where do you draw the line? Man and man? Man and dog? Man and child? Where? I personally think the definition of marriage should be between two consenting ADULTS....Regardless of gender. If that is what makes two people happy, and those people share a strong bond and immense love for one another, who are they hurting?? NO one! And lets face it, the world is overpopulated. Most same sex couple adopt children that are unwanted in other parts of the world, or even our own country. In my eyes, they are doing a lot of good in the world. Haters will be haters. Keep on hating. Two queers raising children to be queers is not a service to our planet...I never said two fags can't live together, I simply said the state shouldn't recognize it as a marriage. If a man can marry a man and pervert nature as such, what is to prevent a man marrying a child? Where and how do you draw the line? Where do your morals come from? If you can fuck and marry anything you "love" then why exclude anyone? Poor people do poor people things, and rich people do rich people things. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it! when you rob Paul to give to Peter ... ... ... you will always get Peters support! :Brieffromnativea: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1237903 Australia 01/22/2011 08:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1239722 United States 01/22/2011 08:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just ask " Bend Over ' Barney Franks supporters, who may NOT be able to talk 'face to face' with you either, lol ! |
ajk User ID: 1114631 United States 01/22/2011 08:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hell yeah, let all the fags fuck each other;More pussy for me...However, I will not stand for redefining marriage. Marriage is between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, all else is just fuck'n in the woods... Quoting: BRIEF AND TO THE POINTHow loving of you...... They can pervert nature all they want, I just don't want to hear about it...I don't go around yelling about how great my heterosexuality is, and I won't stand for the redefinition of marriage. If we redefine marriage we start down the slippery slope...next is marriage to dogs and cats...where do you draw the line? Where do you draw the line? Man and man? Man and dog? Man and child? Where? I personally think the definition of marriage should be between two consenting ADULTS....Regardless of gender. If that is what makes two people happy, and those people share a strong bond and immense love for one another, who are they hurting?? NO one! And lets face it, the world is overpopulated. Most same sex couple adopt children that are unwanted in other parts of the world, or even our own country. Those children often have everything they need and are loved very much. Those children grow up to be tolerant and accepting of everyone, which is how it should be in the world, but sadly isn't. In my eyes, they are doing a lot of good in the world. Haters will be haters. Keep on hating. I'm not so sure on the overpopulation thing, given they wanna depopulate us anyway, but I don't think the world is gonna collapse either because a few select people choose to be with someone of their own gender. Babies are still gonna be born, men and women will still marry and populate regardless. It's not like everyone is gonna become suddenly gay or anything like that. To go even further with this, I would also like to make the point that.....the way homosexuality is portrayed in media is far from how I'd think a typical gay man or lesbian woman would want their relationships represented. It's much like how heterosexual relationships are shown, do you guys like how it is portrayed? Somehow I kinda doubt it, so what makes you think homosexuals are any different in this end? I think regardless of relationship type we all just want happiness and love, all the rest is basically media spin. No one is perfect. A babe before walking will first stumble and fall many times but NEVER gives up until he succeeds. Always remember, ultimately, to never follow any person's belief. Your relationship with God is between you and God. If nothing else, remember this: religion = subservience, control and conformity, the same template as EVERY government "Most believers would kill truth if truth threatened their religion." L. K. Washburn "This crime called blasphemy was invented by priests for the purpose of defending doctrines not able to take care of themselves." Robert Ingersoll "If anyone wants to know how God feels, it's a warm light as if the sun is poking through dark clouds and lifting your spirits with pure joy." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1239900 Germany 01/22/2011 08:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Same-sex marriage is legal in Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Iceland, Germanythe Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, Spain and Sweden. In Mexico, same-sex marriages are only performed in Mexico City, but these marriages must be recognized by all Mexican states. Israel does not recognize same-sex marriages performed on its territory, but recognizes same-sex marriages performed in foreign jurisdictions. and for americans it is a problem ??[/b] facts : [link to en.wikipedia.org] |
ajk User ID: 1114631 United States 01/22/2011 08:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: ajkHow loving of you...... They can pervert nature all they want, I just don't want to hear about it...I don't go around yelling about how great my heterosexuality is, and I won't stand for the redefinition of marriage. If we redefine marriage we start down the slippery slope...next is marriage to dogs and cats...where do you draw the line? Where do you draw the line? Man and man? Man and dog? Man and child? Where? I personally think the definition of marriage should be between two consenting ADULTS....Regardless of gender. If that is what makes two people happy, and those people share a strong bond and immense love for one another, who are they hurting?? NO one! And lets face it, the world is overpopulated. Most same sex couple adopt children that are unwanted in other parts of the world, or even our own country. In my eyes, they are doing a lot of good in the world. Haters will be haters. Keep on hating. Two queers raising children to be queers is not a service to our planet...I never said two fags can't live together, I simply said the state shouldn't recognize it as a marriage. If a man can marry a man and pervert nature as such, what is to prevent a man marrying a child? Where and how do you draw the line? Where do your morals come from? If you can fuck and marry anything you "love" then why exclude anyone? Firstly on the man marrying a child argument, that is ENTIRELY different and FAR from consensual. You're using an extreme case to base your prejudices on. That's number one, number two as to where our morals come from? How about simple common sense? Is that so hard of a concept to grasp? If you're hurting someone else in your actions, then more than likely something is wrong with what you are doing. No religious belief system needed to figure that one out is there? Lastly, what if those kids have no other options? Would rather they have no parents at all to guide them? And who says the child they raise is gonna be automatically gay?? No one is perfect. A babe before walking will first stumble and fall many times but NEVER gives up until he succeeds. Always remember, ultimately, to never follow any person's belief. Your relationship with God is between you and God. If nothing else, remember this: religion = subservience, control and conformity, the same template as EVERY government "Most believers would kill truth if truth threatened their religion." L. K. Washburn "This crime called blasphemy was invented by priests for the purpose of defending doctrines not able to take care of themselves." Robert Ingersoll "If anyone wants to know how God feels, it's a warm light as if the sun is poking through dark clouds and lifting your spirits with pure joy." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1043297 United States 01/22/2011 08:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1239722 United States 01/22/2011 08:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |