| Users Online Now: 1,422 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 473,798 | |
| Pageviews Today: 609,736 | Threads Today: 184 | Posts Today: 2,144 |
| 05:21 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,422 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 473,798 | |
| Pageviews Today: 609,736 | Threads Today: 184 | Posts Today: 2,144 |
| 05:21 AM | ||
Zecharia Sitchin Predicted Enki of the Anunnaki Returing! | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1512100  United States10/08/2012 12:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1512100 United States10/08/2012 01:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
IronCross  User ID: 25165294 United States10/08/2012 01:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.sitchiniswrong.com] 'Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views" - William F Buckley Jr |
| Mode apadahjadi User ID: 1105175  Singapore10/08/2012 05:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| THE TRUTH User ID: 24808382 United States10/08/2012 05:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25170712  Hong Kong10/08/2012 05:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25170712 Hong Kong10/08/2012 05:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 3810017 United States10/08/2012 05:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sitchen was not a liar. If you actually looked at the evidence instead of just reading stupid Internet blogs then you wouldn't embarass yourself so badly. The Sumerian translations are huge. The transcripts aren't just a couple of scrolls. We're talking about thousands and thousands of documents. The story is too long to be manipulated. The worst they can throw at sitchen how he chose to translate a word here and there. But no living man could have manipulated the Epichs. After all, there are many translators. Not just sitchen. The story remains the same. Other translators have vetted it. They were only capable of changing the occasional word here or there but that did not change the vast details of history. For all intents and purposes, sitchen was 100% correct. He even predicted astronomical discoveries long before NASA. And all he used were Sumerian scrolls. |
| sssss User ID: 25091341  Australia10/08/2012 05:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| the mighty Atom User ID: 23715861  Japan10/08/2012 06:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24808382 United States10/08/2012 06:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sitchen was not a liar. If you actually looked at the evidence instead of just reading stupid Internet blogs then you wouldn't embarass yourself so badly. The Sumerian translations are huge. The transcripts aren't just a couple of scrolls. We're talking about thousands and thousands of documents. The story is too long to be manipulated. The worst they can throw at sitchen how he chose to translate a word here and there. But no living man could have manipulated the Epichs. After all, there are many translators. Not just sitchen. The story remains the same. Other translators have vetted it. They were only capable of changing the occasional word here or there but that did not change the vast details of history. For all intents and purposes, sitchen was 100% correct. He even predicted astronomical discoveries long before NASA. And all he used were Sumerian scrolls. None of what you wrote is accurate! You are an easily deceived sheep. 100% of all other independent translators have confirmed that Shitchin was wrong, and completely made up much of his work. This fact is actually well-known at this point; except for the few that are so profoundly ignorant and uninformed that still buy in to Shitchin's stories. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25170712 Hong Kong10/08/2012 06:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOL no, that site is a mockery of scholarly research. It is not even remotely academic and is definitely written by someone who is Abrahamic-Monothesist who tries to turn the whole thing into a defense of the Talmudic version of the seven tablets of creation, which is clearly to anyone with a brain Sitchin or no Sitchin the 7 days of creation from Genesis, just as Ziusudra is the story of Noah found in the Atra Hasis. That the blogger who made sitchiniswrong tries to make a case for this being off base just goes to show his agenda. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25170712 Hong Kong10/08/2012 06:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sitchen was not a liar. If you actually looked at the evidence instead of just reading stupid Internet blogs then you wouldn't embarass yourself so badly. The Sumerian translations are huge. The transcripts aren't just a couple of scrolls. We're talking about thousands and thousands of documents. The story is too long to be manipulated. The worst they can throw at sitchen how he chose to translate a word here and there. But no living man could have manipulated the Epichs. After all, there are many translators. Not just sitchen. The story remains the same. Other translators have vetted it. They were only capable of changing the occasional word here or there but that did not change the vast details of history. For all intents and purposes, sitchen was 100% correct. He even predicted astronomical discoveries long before NASA. And all he used were Sumerian scrolls. None of what you wrote is accurate! You are an easily deceived sheep. 100% of all other independent translators have confirmed that Shitchin was wrong, and completely made up much of his work. This fact is actually well-known at this point; except for the few that are so profoundly ignorant and uninformed that still buy in to Shitchin's stories. You are just lying at this point. 100% of the bulk of the work covered by Sitchin is work done by other authors and it has been challenged many, many times, and no, it has not been disproven or contested. Sitchins analysis doesn't ever defer from the academically accepted translations, he merely surmises different ways those words can be interpreted based on his understanding of several other languages. The fact that so many Bibletards parade that stupid blog around as if it were concrete proof of all the research that Sitchin has analyzed and researched is wrong, just goes to show how fucking dumb and simpleminded a lot of people are. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1512100 United States10/08/2012 11:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1512100 United States10/08/2012 11:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sitchen was not a liar. If you actually looked at the evidence instead of just reading stupid Internet blogs then you wouldn't embarass yourself so badly. The Sumerian translations are huge. The transcripts aren't just a couple of scrolls. We're talking about thousands and thousands of documents. The story is too long to be manipulated. The worst they can throw at sitchen how he chose to translate a word here and there. But no living man could have manipulated the Epichs. After all, there are many translators. Not just sitchen. The story remains the same. Other translators have vetted it. They were only capable of changing the occasional word here or there but that did not change the vast details of history. For all intents and purposes, sitchen was 100% correct. He even predicted astronomical discoveries long before NASA. And all he used were Sumerian scrolls. None of what you wrote is accurate! You are an easily deceived sheep. 100% of all other independent translators have confirmed that Shitchin was wrong, and completely made up much of his work. This fact is actually well-known at this point; except for the few that are so profoundly ignorant and uninformed that still buy in to Shitchin's stories. You are just lying at this point. 100% of the bulk of the work covered by Sitchin is work done by other authors and it has been challenged many, many times, and no, it has not been disproven or contested. Sitchins analysis doesn't ever defer from the academically accepted translations, he merely surmises different ways those words can be interpreted based on his understanding of several other languages. The fact that so many Bibletards parade that stupid blog around as if it were concrete proof of all the research that Sitchin has analyzed and researched is wrong, just goes to show how fucking dumb and simpleminded a lot of people are. Proof there are those with eyes & minds open  |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1512100 United States10/08/2012 11:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1512100 United States10/08/2012 11:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sitchen was not a liar. If you actually looked at the evidence instead of just reading stupid Internet blogs then you wouldn't embarass yourself so badly. The Sumerian translations are huge. The transcripts aren't just a couple of scrolls. We're talking about thousands and thousands of documents. The story is too long to be manipulated. The worst they can throw at sitchen how he chose to translate a word here and there. But no living man could have manipulated the Epichs. After all, there are many translators. Not just sitchen. The story remains the same. Other translators have vetted it. They were only capable of changing the occasional word here or there but that did not change the vast details of history. For all intents and purposes, sitchen was 100% correct. He even predicted astronomical discoveries long before NASA. And all he used were Sumerian scrolls.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25183121  Netherlands10/08/2012 11:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1512100 United States10/08/2012 11:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| AtsuiPanda User ID: 16510251 United States10/08/2012 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| AtsuiPanda User ID: 16510251 United States10/08/2012 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1512100 United States10/08/2012 12:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | On March 11, 1968, U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson mandated that all computers purchased by the United States federal government support ASCII, stating: I have also approved recommendations of the Secretary of Commerce regarding standards for recording the Standard Code for Information Interchange on magnetic tapes and paper tapes when they are used in computer operations. All computers and related equipment configurations brought into the Federal Government inventory on and after July 1, 1969, must have the capability to use the Standard Code for Information Interchange and the formats prescribed by the magnetic tape and paper tape standards when these media are used.[33] Source - [link to en.wikipedia.org] When we Humans attempted our first communication with them, we encoded that message it was Binary/Ascii code which was used and knowledge of how to Decode and encode our message was also given, Learn More here. So it is not coincidental Enki of the Anunnaki just recently encoded his name in binary code in this July 2011 Crop Circle! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1556544  Puerto Rico10/08/2012 12:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| AtsuiPanda User ID: 16510251 United States10/08/2012 12:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | On March 11, 1968, U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson mandated that all computers purchased by the United States federal government support ASCII, stating: I have also approved recommendations of the Secretary of Commerce regarding standards for recording the Standard Code for Information Interchange on magnetic tapes and paper tapes when they are used in computer operations. All computers and related equipment configurations brought into the Federal Government inventory on and after July 1, 1969, must have the capability to use the Standard Code for Information Interchange and the formats prescribed by the magnetic tape and paper tape standards when these media are used.[33] Source - [link to en.wikipedia.org] When we Humans attempted our first communication with them, we encoded that message it was Binary/Ascii code which was used and knowledge of how to Decode and encode our message was also given, Learn More here. So it is not coincidental Enki of the Anunnaki just recently encoded his name in binary code in this July 2011 Crop Circle! Hmm nice , 5 Stars :/sdfhasdfshasd/: Those who live by the sword die by the sword, those who don't live by the sword are subject to those who do. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1512100 United States10/08/2012 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | On March 11, 1968, U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson mandated that all computers purchased by the United States federal government support ASCII, stating: I have also approved recommendations of the Secretary of Commerce regarding standards for recording the Standard Code for Information Interchange on magnetic tapes and paper tapes when they are used in computer operations. All computers and related equipment configurations brought into the Federal Government inventory on and after July 1, 1969, must have the capability to use the Standard Code for Information Interchange and the formats prescribed by the magnetic tape and paper tape standards when these media are used.[33] Source - [link to en.wikipedia.org] When we Humans attempted our first communication with them, we encoded that message it was Binary/Ascii code which was used and knowledge of how to Decode and encode our message was also given, Learn More here. So it is not coincidental Enki of the Anunnaki just recently encoded his name in binary code in this July 2011 Crop Circle! Hmm nice , 5 Stars Thank You Sucks that video no longer works though, here is another regarding the same issue... |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1512100 United States10/08/2012 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 1512100 United States10/09/2012 01:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19742243 United States10/09/2012 02:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19742243 United States10/09/2012 02:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Enki, the great chief scientist of the Anunnaki, was the leader of the first team of Anunnaki to come to Earth. His name, EN.KI, meant “Lord of Earth” in Sumerian. But that title was granted to him only later, after the arrival of his half-brother Enlil (EN.LIL = “Lord of the Command”). The original Epithet-name of Enki was E.A., commonly taken to mean “He whose home is water.” He was depicted by the Sumerians as a seated deity outpouring streams of water. He was the prototype of the Water Bearer Aquarius and his zodiacal constellation." - Zecharia Sitchin Enki is returning Sitchin has stated. The zodiacal cycle returns to exactly the same spot every 25,920 years. So we are now leaving the Age of Pisces. Enki was the prototype god of Aquarius. Whether this means that it is all going to happen again the Enki is coming back, I don’t know There are a lot of signaling and signs that all point in that direction. - Zecharia Sitchin |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1752579  Canada10/10/2012 04:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sitchen was not a liar. If you actually looked at the evidence instead of just reading stupid Internet blogs then you wouldn't embarass yourself so badly. The Sumerian translations are huge. The transcripts aren't just a couple of scrolls. We're talking about thousands and thousands of documents. The story is too long to be manipulated. The worst they can throw at sitchen how he chose to translate a word here and there. But no living man could have manipulated the Epichs. After all, there are many translators. Not just sitchen. The story remains the same. Other translators have vetted it. They were only capable of changing the occasional word here or there but that did not change the vast details of history. For all intents and purposes, sitchen was 100% correct. He even predicted astronomical discoveries long before NASA. And all he used were Sumerian scrolls. None of what you wrote is accurate! You are an easily deceived sheep. 100% of all other independent translators have confirmed that Shitchin was wrong, and completely made up much of his work. This fact is actually well-known at this point; except for the few that are so profoundly ignorant and uninformed that still buy in to Shitchin's stories. You are just lying at this point. 100% of the bulk of the work covered by Sitchin is work done by other authors and it has been challenged many, many times, and no, it has not been disproven or contested. Sitchins analysis doesn't ever defer from the academically accepted translations, he merely surmises different ways those words can be interpreted based on his understanding of several other languages. The fact that so many Bibletards parade that stupid blog around as if it were concrete proof of all the research that Sitchin has analyzed and researched is wrong, just goes to show how fucking dumb and simpleminded a lot of people are. Ahahaha Bibletards.... BRILLIANT. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25370710 United States10/11/2012 12:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
