NRA Preparing To "Push Back" Against The Gun Control Idiots | |
NISA715 User ID: 27231023 United States 12/18/2012 05:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NRA has released their first statement. Thread: The NRA has Spoken! First Statement on Shootings in Newtown Released. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30051338 United States 12/18/2012 05:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sledster User ID: 982167 Germany 12/19/2012 03:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Are people forgetting we have a Constitution that allows Americans to bare arms? Quoting: sunspotkiller at he time the 2nd amendment was written, rifles with 100 round mags didn't exist....in fact rifles of any sort never existed..only muskets and pistols were available. So what? Your point is invalidated by the fact that at the time EVERYONE had the same armaments. What that means to me is that we should still ALL have the same armaments. To include fully automatic machine guns if that is your fancy and you dont mind the tax stamp or knowing that the ATF can come to your home at any time and inspect said weapons without a warrant. Leave the law-abiding citizen out of your "conversation", you may find that there are unintended consequences. Last Edited by Alferd Packer on 12/19/2012 03:22 PM I'm tired of waiting, somebody push the damn button already! Keep your 72 virgins, give me one old biker chick. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30054494 United States 12/19/2012 03:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Its time to start a conversation about the side effects of these prescription drugs... [link to www.businessinsider.com] |
No Dhimmi User ID: 256987 United States 12/19/2012 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | During the Revolutionary War, only THREE percent of the people actually fought against Great Britain. Only TEN percent of the citizens actively supported that three percent. Approximately TWENTY percent considered themselves to be on the side of the Revolution, but they did not actively participate. Towards the climatic end of the war, approximately THIRTY percent actually fought on the side of the British. The rest of the citizens had no disposition either way. They didn’t care. They didn’t want anything to do with what they deemed to simply be a political issue. Where do you stand? [link to freedomintelligence.wordpress.com] ALL relevant scriptures that include a time factor prove no pre-trib rapture. Over 50 verses! Kindle Edition only 99 CENTS! Biblical Eschatological “Time-Stamps” Relevant to the Last Day/Days (Amazon) |
Top Hat Top Hat User ID: 1692880 12/19/2012 03:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My wife is a high school principal of a very large county school. We want school control not gun control. Allow my wife to have more SRO officers, security mechanisms and access to non lethal OR lethal weaponry while at school. This is about school control instead of gun control. |
Conspiracy Theorist User ID: 8962305 United States 12/19/2012 03:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Are people forgetting we have a Constitution that allows Americans to bare arms? Quoting: sunspotkiller at he time the 2nd amendment was written, rifles with 100 round mags didn't exist....in fact rifles of any sort never existed..only muskets and pistols were available. Doesn't matter one bit. At the time it was written, the intent was for citizens to have the same firearms the military had. State of the art technology at the time. Why would you think their intent would change with changing technology? . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9422178 United States 12/19/2012 03:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Resister User ID: 669410 United States 12/19/2012 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "If you really want to stop incidents like this," the source continued, "passing one more law is not going to do a damn thing. Columbine happened when? In 1999. Smack in the middle of the original assault-weapons ban." Quoting: TXGal4Truth Read more: [link to www.foxnews.com] Reinstating a law or creating new ones like it that did not stop a similar tragedy then will have the same non-existent affect on public safety now. The reason is simple. You can't stop crazy people from doing crazy things and there is no law that will stop criminals from stealing what they want or improvising to get what they want done another way. Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is a definition of insanity ...which makes sense when you consider that progressive liberalism (where the anti-gun crowd comes from) is a mental disorder. "God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, & always, well informed... If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty... Let them take arms... What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. " - Thomas Jefferson in 1787 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15326304 United States 12/19/2012 03:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Guns don't kill. Quoting: sunspotkiller People kill. It the behavior of the human that needs to be addressed not gun control. that's EXACTLY why america needs to make sure weapons don't get in the hands of the mentally ill... i know its scary isnt it that these insane people have there fingers on the button that could kill every life on this planet 2000 times over |
Resister User ID: 669410 United States 12/19/2012 03:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It wouldn't even make it to the supreme court. Most first person shooter video games are already labeled as either NC17 or M for mature adult-only product. "God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, & always, well informed... If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty... Let them take arms... What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. " - Thomas Jefferson in 1787 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1440618 Canada 12/19/2012 03:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30331154 United States 12/19/2012 03:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Guns don't kill. Quoting: sunspotkiller People kill. Rocks don't kill But you can kill someone with a rock. It the behavior of the human that needs to be addressed not gun control. It's like the FCC and Janet's nipple. RIDICULOUS Yes, human behaviour and corporate greed such as big pharma to push dangerous drugs whose side effects include "aggressive behaviours", "suicide", etc. Even though there is no proof yet other than what the shooter's uncle supposedly said that this shooter was on one there have been many other shooter's on these drugs. I would say that the chances that the Sandy Hook shooter was either on one currently or had just come off one are pretty high. I hope NRA adds this to their "push back" along with the violent video games and other issues. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1144869 United States 12/19/2012 03:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My wife is a high school principal of a very large county school. We want school control not gun control. Allow my wife to have more SRO officers, security mechanisms and access to non lethal OR lethal weaponry while at school. This is about school control instead of gun control. I only disagree on certain points: First of all, the SROs would be a primary target. Any lunatic knows the SRO is carrying and would take them out first. On the other hand, if you have teachers who want to carry and have been trained, conceal permit, etc. carrying concealed weapons, a shooter has no idea who is armed and who isn't. No way they'll pick that school. And if they did, they wouldn't get too far. By the way, my wife is a public school teacher and I have three kids in public schools. On the whole, we're on the same page. But I say let the Teachers, Staff, and SROs carry. Teachers and Staff only after proper training of course. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30307266 United Kingdom 12/19/2012 03:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm of the opinion that this is an issue for Americans to resolve. I have an opinion, but it matters not one jot. I can not and never will understand the gun culture of the US. That's why non-Americans should just butt out and leave them to it. Let them continue killing each other. The situation is beyond reproach. There are simply too many guns in general circulation. If I was an American living in America, I would want a gun to defend myself too. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1121958 United States 12/19/2012 03:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Are people forgetting we have a Constitution that allows Americans to bare arms? Quoting: sunspotkiller At the time the 2nd amendment was written, rifles with 100 round mags didn't exist....in fact rifles of any sort never existed..only muskets and pistols were available. Thats right because that was state of the art in that day and the people were armed with the same type of weapons available to any army. The same should hold true today. The second ammendment was designed to uphold our God given right to defend ourselves, our states, and our nation against any threat including our own tyrannical government that is showing its ugly ass. It makes nomention of any limit as to number, type, or limited use of these arms the people have their God given right to buy, possess and use. What you anti gun asswipes seem to overlook is the fact that the government never gave us this right, its an uninalienable right, a God given right, and as such the government has no recourse. They didnt grant the right, the constitution upholds the right, and the government has no legal or constitutional authority to resind that right. Make no mistake the pro gun public is very well aware of our constitutional right and the constitutional authority of government which is limited only to that authority SPECIFICALLY granted to by the constitution. In reallity the government is going to end up on the losing end of the stick. The supreme court has already upheld and set case presedence that the right to keep and bear arms applies to individules and as such set precedence that the 2nd ammendment is valid. If the current administration and I use that term loosely, sees fit to circumvent the constitution and congress, he is asking for a civil war in this country and by God he'll get it. This is clearely the line in the sand, we have taken nothing but shiut from the guy and always bent but this is the straw. As to all you anti gun fucknuts, you can all be dumbasses but at least try to educate yourselves on what it is you are trying to fight about |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20559344 United States 12/19/2012 04:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I will accept no law that leaves Homeland Security more armed than myself, on the grounds that I have better accuracy with an assault rifle than them, and I wouldn't trust them in a time of foreign invasion more than myself. They'd be prone to letting the guns vanish like they did in 2010. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18267374 Our government is too incompetent to be trusted in a case of homeland war, whether it be invasive or civil. It's my responsibility as an American citizen to protect myself, my country, and my constitution. This war has just begun. fucking right! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7803284 United States 12/19/2012 04:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11963746 United States 12/19/2012 04:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Are people forgetting we have a Constitution that allows Americans to bare arms? Quoting: sunspotkiller at he time the 2nd amendment was written, rifles with 100 round mags didn't exist....in fact rifles of any sort never existed..only muskets and pistols were available. False argunment. Does that mean that, since modern media technology (television, radio, the internet, zerox printers, etc) did not exist during the 1700's, that freedom of speech only applies to the spoken word and vintage printing presses from the 1700's using hand made paper? Wait... I better not give "liberals" like yourself any ideas. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17152779 United States 12/19/2012 04:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30075865 United States 12/19/2012 04:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Are people forgetting we have a Constitution that allows Americans to bare arms? Quoting: sunspotkiller at he time the 2nd amendment was written, rifles with 100 round mags didn't exist....in fact rifles of any sort never existed..only muskets and pistols were available. So what? Your point is invalidated by the fact that at the time EVERYONE had the same armaments. What that means to me is that we should still ALL have the same armaments. To include fully automatic machine guns if that is your fancy and you dont mind the tax stamp or knowing that the ATF can come to your home at any time and inspect said weapons without a warrant. Leave the law-abiding citizen out of your "conversation", you may find that there are unintended consequences. It is quite obvious that you have no idea why the American founding fathers included the language that they did as it pertains to the Second Amendment! Don't preach shit unless you know what the fuck your talking about!!!!!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4613981 United States 12/19/2012 04:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Only a few have the fire of patriotism alive and are aware of what's going on. We're at a disadvantage to our forefathers because everyone wanted to get out from under the boot of the opression and today people are too strung out/lazy/misinformed/scared to know who the enemy is. I pray people will not let the last bastion of freedom in the world fall to these satanic bastards. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30138093 ummmmm, no. americans have been brainwashed by TPTB..how paranoid have you all become?...TPTB have lured you into buying guns, guns and more guns....and you all follow like sheep. Question for ya 506. Are YOU an American? Why are trolling this thread ? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29412599 United States 12/19/2012 04:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I will accept no law that leaves Homeland Security more armed than myself, on the grounds that I have better accuracy with an assault rifle than them, and I wouldn't trust them in a time of foreign invasion more than myself. They'd be prone to letting the guns vanish like they did in 2010. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18267374 Our government is too incompetent to be trusted in a case of homeland war, whether it be invasive or civil. It's my responsibility as an American citizen to protect myself, my country, and my constitution. This war has just begun. The government can't even organize a hurricane clean-up with success, let alone a full war on the soil. I think most would agree with you on your point. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4613981 United States 12/19/2012 04:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Guns don't kill. Quoting: sunspotkiller People kill. It the behavior of the human that needs to be addressed not gun control. that's EXACTLY why america needs to make sure weapons don't get in the hands of the mentally ill... You really should just worry about your own lil country. |
Billxam User ID: 19542178 United States 12/19/2012 04:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Are people forgetting we have a Constitution that allows Americans to bare arms? Quoting: sunspotkiller at he time the 2nd amendment was written, rifles with 100 round mags didn't exist....in fact rifles of any sort never existed..only muskets and pistols were available. Sorry shill, this is an American problem. Your advice and opinions are not wanted. Proud to be UnV'd There is one constant in life: If you build something worth having, someone will try to take it or destroy it. Proud member of A Brotherhood Against Totalitarian Enactments, Americans Who Hate Aging, proud supporter of attractive women. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9422178 United States 12/19/2012 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It wouldn't even make it to the supreme court. Most first person shooter video games are already labeled as either NC17 or M for mature adult-only product. I mean they all ready did. [link to www.foxnews.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4613981 United States 12/19/2012 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30250506 that's EXACTLY why america needs to make sure weapons don't get in the hands of the mentally ill... Where I live you have to jump through hoops to get a gun. Classes, permits, background checks etc... Now if some mentally ill person was threatening me, I'm glad I'll have a loaded gun to protect myself. That guy murdered children who were 6 & 7 years old. They had no defense. He could of snapped their necks just as easy. Gun control isn't going to make mentally ill people not due mentally ill things. The USA is taking away programs and money for mentally ill people and education to balance their budgets. There's going to be more side effects like this one. this is the problem with you guys. you can't even admit you have a problem. what happened is not a joke, 20 babies died because some mentally ill fucktard had easy access to guns. I pity you. You guys were disarmed and now you demand everyone else be too ... you're just jealous. Get over it, people in this country can own firearms ... The laws of the US are really none of your business. I second that. Sour grapes from the Aussie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17152779 United States 12/19/2012 04:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Are people forgetting we have a Constitution that allows Americans to bare arms? Quoting: sunspotkiller at he time the 2nd amendment was written, rifles with 100 round mags didn't exist....in fact rifles of any sort never existed..only muskets and pistols were available. Sorry shill, this is an American problem. Your advice and opinions are not wanted. As an American I completely disagree. America has much to learn from other countries, especially since we have the highest murder rate in the western world. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1121958 United States 12/19/2012 04:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We do need strict gun control in cities, where the intelligent people live. If all the dumbfuck knuckle-dragging redneck conservitard country apes want to shoot each other, that's just fine with me. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17152779 Better be careful who you talk to assclown havent seen much food grown in your precious cities. All us knuckle dragging apes might just decide your little grocery store doesnt need any more food supplied and starve your inelligent ass to death then when you get hungry enough to grow a set of balls and go into the dreaded dangerous land of apes and guns, we can feed your pathetic bag of starved bones to our hogs, they have to eat too and are used to eating shit. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30348380 Mexico 12/19/2012 04:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |