Tony Rooke wins his TV License case by stating the BBC were complicit in 9/11.

Users Online Now: 1,496 (Who's On?)		Visitors Today: 155,322
Pageviews Today: 209,961	Threads Today: 92	Posts Today: 878
01:45 AM

Page 1 Bottom Search Replies Previous Page Next Page
Search Terms: Highlight Matches
Tony Rooke wins his TV License case by stating the BBC were complicit in 9/11.
Free Planet User ID: 36166298 United Kingdom 04/10/2013 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Tony Rooke wins his TV License case by stating the BBC were complicit in 9/11. seriously, this is EXTREMELY SIGNIFICANT in the sense that the BBC didn't mention this before being taken to court by Tony Rooke: and they still haven't talked about it. Points Of View, anyone? VIDEO HERE... [link to mikephilbin.blogspot.co.uk] In fact, why haven't the BBC posted a counter-claim to Rooke's suggestion the they were complicit in the events of the day on 9/11? Are they in a legal position where Rooke's concession to Disclosure in such a case might reveal a "National Security" flag on the BBC's part? A 'national security flag' covering the BBC against 9/11 (and/or 7/7?), does such exist? Has any researcher done the 'due diligence' FIOA on this question?

Anonymous Coward User ID: 37021243 United Kingdom 04/10/2013 03:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Tony Rooke wins his TV License case by stating the BBC were complicit in 9/11. I remember hearing about this case, but do you have a better source.
Free Planet User ID: 6760513 United Kingdom 04/11/2013 02:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Tony Rooke wins his TV License case by stating the BBC were complicit in 9/11. just watch the video testimony and quit judging. :)
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3579277 United Kingdom 04/11/2013 02:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Tony Rooke wins his TV License case by stating the BBC were complicit in 9/11. He said he's still got to pay his TV licence. Brave man.

Anonymous Coward User ID: 37842123 Poland 04/11/2013 05:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Tony Rooke wins his TV License case by stating the BBC were complicit in 9/11.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36226622 Australia 04/11/2013 05:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Tony Rooke wins his TV License case by stating the BBC were complicit in 9/11. Encourage people to do the same thing? Get 200 pounds court costs and have to buy a TV license?
Judethz User ID: 20521597 United Kingdom 04/11/2013 06:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Tony Rooke wins his TV License case by stating the BBC were complicit in 9/11. [link to www.youtube.com]

The Idioid User ID: 37361733 United Kingdom 04/11/2013 06:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Tony Rooke wins his TV License case by stating the BBC were complicit in 9/11. He said he's still got to pay his TV licence. Brave man. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3579277 He doesn't need a TV license, you only need it to watch 'live' broadcasts, such as sports events or ceremonial parades, the BBC are very worried by the number of people catching on to this and refusing to buy one. That only applies tothe BBC channels by the way.
Free Planet User ID: 6760513 United Kingdom 04/11/2013 01:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Tony Rooke wins his TV License case by stating the BBC were complicit in 9/11. He said he's still got to pay his TV licence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3579277 His 'wink' when he said this suggests to me he'll trip out 7/7 when they ask for it next year. ;)
Page 1 Top Previous Page Next Page

Related Threads

GLP