REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!

Intelligent design.....You may call him God.....But i refer to him as the programmer....What are you thought's on the double slit paradox....Or how partials observe us observing them and alter their movements with your theory.....Can it be tied together????

I refer to him/it as the creator, I hope very much to meet him one day! I have a LOT of questions!

YES, it's about oppression and controlling the masses .And I think that is why the truth is being suppressed. The people who fund sceintific research also run the resource selling game, and energy is king. They write the checks demanding specific outcomes. YEP!

Very little doubt about that.
Science should not be swayed by funding.
It then becomes something other than science.

Yep

I am just wondering why this Japanese fellow as went off the rails of this religious suppression of science. I hope it is the beginning of something good.

Dark matter is the biggest crock of shit I've ever heard of in my life.

If your equations and simulations according to your model don't work out and your model is disproved, you're supposed to change the model, not make up shit in such a way to make your model work.

They're no longer inventing a model to explain the universe. They're inventing a universe to explain a model.

If you say 2+2=5 and discover you are wrong, you fix the equation. You don't claim the value of 2 is really 3/2 to make your flawed equation work. But that's pretty much what they're doing with dark matter to explain away the flaw.

I'm wondering that, too. He seemed to be a stalwart.

Seems to substantiate your post.




In the article, titled "Anapole Dark Matter," the physicists propose that dark matter, an invisible form of matter that makes up 85 percent of the all the matter in the universe, may be made out of a type of basic particle called the Majorana fermion. The particle's existence was predicted in the 1930's but has stubbornly resisted detection.
[link to www.sciencedaily.com]

They don't know jack shit. When I was in college in the '80s the big thing was this super computer called the GF-11 (11 Gigaflop). Basically the gubmint gave IBM 1/2 a billion dollars to make this computer so they could run it for over a year to calculate to orbit of a sub-atomic particle (maybe a quark or bozon, whatever)

I was shocked, how could a model of a simple particle be that complicated? Obviously any retard would understand whatever the truth was it would have to be a simple model for a simple particle. Not a 1 year compute job !!! In fact all their theories violate Occum's razor, which is a theory they love to shove in your face whenever it benefits them.

To me what is so very revealing to me is that under ordinary circumstances a thread like this would be flooded wit mainstream sills painting me as a clown or an idiot, and they're not even attempting to debunk my theories of gravity or light at all.

Lack of understanding doesn't disqualify the theory.
In the real world there can be no distance 0. Both in quantum theory and relativity you would use Planck length as the smallest distance. Planck length is not = 0.

Religion is what is holding back science not the other way round, religion was made to control the masses

Michio Kaku....gimme a freakin' break. LMAO

It does if no one understands it and there is absolutely no consensus on what it actually says, and there isn't.

here we see an example of making up crap to fit the theory by one of it's supporters, one that I might add DOES NOT understand it.. There obviously is a distance of zero. Put your fingertips together. The distance between them when they are touching is ZERO

By giving a 0 distance this guy thinks two things can occupy the same space at the same time. Not possible. You would be limited to Planck length so that two objects are not occupying the same space at the same time.

By giving a 0 distance this guy thinks two things can occupy the same space at the same time. Not possible. You would be limited to Planck length so that two objects are not occupying the same space at the same time.

Religion is what is holding back science not the other way round, religion was made to control the masses

NO! he is saying ACCORDING TO ThE ThEORY the singularity of a black hole and a mass captured by it can and must eventually occupy the same place eventually, and he is right

Main streamers admit Relativity is hopelessly flawed


The reason is simple, because in order to prevent any KE calculation resulting in mass in excess of light speed, the proved formula was inexplicably altered wit 'resting mass energy" in the 'relativistic' formula so that no input of energy could ever possibly result in >C velocities!
Now I will present my theory, which is falsifiable by a nearly infinite number of experiments or observations.GOOD LUCK

GRAVITY EXPLAINED: what it REALLY is


Now, let me explain in very simple terms what the weak force gravity REALLY is.

In all matter there are electrons and protons. These particles both have an electrical or electrostatic charge.

Neutrons have no charge and they are the answer to the question of gravity, as I will explain.

In objects or masses which exert a force of gravity on other objects, there must be [and always are] neutrons present.

: This is because gravity is actually simply the electrostatic attraction between particles with a difference in charge potential, the neutrally charged neutron and the negatively charged electron exert a force inversely proportional to the distance they are from each other upon each other.

The simultaneous repelling and attracting forces of protons and electrons in two masses cancel, and this simply explains why gravity is weaker of the forces when compared to electromagnetism.
All matter with neutrons possesses a force of gravity.

ThIS IS AN INTELLIGENTLY DESIGNED ELECTRIC UNIVERSE!

There is no mystery to electrostatic attraction, it is a well known and accepted reality!

The confusing part to most is that BOTh electrons and protons have a difference in potential with neutrons, and BOTh are attracted to neutrons through this weaker of the forces, electrostatics, which IS gravity!

The simpler of minds would think that if protons attract neutrons {as in the nucleus of the atom which is an undisputed fact}, then neutrons must repel electrons and cancel the force of attraction.

Why? They OBVIOUSLY don't!

Particles with differences in electrical potential always attract electrostaticly even if one is neutral, it is only when they have the same charge do they repel. Since the neutron has no charge of it's own, it has a difference in potential with both electrons and protons and is attracted to both electrostaticly, as proved by the empirical evidence in countless experiments and apparatus dependent on this fact.

Isn't that a lot simpler than making up a bunch of crap about mass warping 'space time' and creating a 'dimple' in space that objects roll down into ?. if this were true why are objects always pulled toward the center of mass no matter what direction it is in relation to orientation of the space/ time crap?? why do objects fall in a straight line towards it when they start out being stationary in relation to the other mass instead of a "curve" along this so called curvature of space time or gravity well?

Anyway, believe me or not watch the video, Einstein is debunked and admitted to be fatally flawed by the mainest of stream science, that jap dude 'yall all think is the second cumming

NO! he is saying ACCORDING TO ThE ThEORY the singularity of a black hole and a mass captured by it can and must eventually occupy the same place eventually, and he is right

Only problem is free neutrons are not attracted to either protons nor electrons.