These fees/fines could be credited.

Chances are...the courts are collecting 'labor-backed' cash for profit or revenue.

They do not even charge the natural persons identity, they charge a 'trade/business' name.

Trade name example:
JOHN SMITH (capitalized)= Trade name.

John Smith (initialized)= natural name.

It would be illegal to bill the natural name of an individual, so they bill a trade/business name instead.

But because they sound the same, folks are fooled into thinking they are the same.

It may be "legal" to bill or charge a trade/business name, however, Making an employee or laborer pay *directly* from their own energy and labor, not *indirectly* from revenue or profit... would be unlawful.