if today was the first day I heard about Amanda knox case does that mean I avoided the distraction..

Wondering the same thing myself. Never even read her name before.

let see what knee jerks occur because of this.. is it all about foreign relations and extradition request etc?

what's to stop the courts now taking her to court again trying her again and slapping another 28 years onto her sentence? and then doing it all over again?

that's what's happened here when the law changed to allow retrial.

maybe this is what its about.

I tend to avoid Hollywood distractions, as well as sensationalized crime, and even if I hear a name often couldn't tell you what the person is famous for.

I have heard the name Amanda Knox, I have a vague idea of the story, but couldn't pick her out in a lineup.

Last Edited by Storm* on 01/31/2014 09:34 AM

She isn't a distraction. She is a mind control device being used on the public to get them to accept "not guilty" in courts is not good enough anymore.

automatic retrial until found guilty?