CANADA'S SECRET PRISONS, INDEFINITE SENTENCES, UNLIMITED ARREST POWERS - New Police State Takes Shape

VIDEO:


Title: "State of Insecurity - Political Repression In Canada"

Producer/Editor/Narrator - William Ray, Canadian Forces Veteran

So much for canada having the best prison system on the planet.

The reason for the little false flag, garner support for the totalitarians.

RIP Cpl. Cirillo. They didn't even put ammo in his gun.

In fact, the security in Parliament didn't have ammo either.

Only the ex-Army Sergeant at Arms - Keith Vickers - at least he kept a Glock in his desk drawer.

I bet he broke the rules by doing so, but everyone is keeping quiet on that one.

BUT HARPER HAD HIS TERRORISM EVENT.

Some people on the inside actually wanted more deaths, I think.

This source is the only one, and its a blogger who says whatever he wants.

Now I am all for fighting against the removal of civil liberties, but I don't see anything concrete to this.

Move along, just from a blogger?

No, silly shilly shilly.

The source is an international organization with branches in the UK, Ireland, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Canada - plus I am leaving some out.

You're supposed to be paid to do better than that!

Its a fucking twitter source, cry me a river and provide more solid information. There are more then enough things to look at besides this bullshit.

It doesnt exist, just a bad con man trying to find ways to con idiots like you out of money.

[link to www.genuinewitty.com]

The key to understanding the fraudulence of Annett’s court comes by deconstructing his use of the phrase “common law”- it’s a real laugh riot, and something already explained on this site back in August, 2012:

“There are two primary types of law- Common Law & Statute Law. Common law refers to the laws that are more or less “that’s the way it has always been done.” Common law relies upon the body of history and prior cases to establish what the rules are, one of the reasons lawyers study past cases so much. Statute law refers to the laws that have been passed by the legislature and have been written down and ‘codified’ for use.

Annett says he is conducting a criminal case, Criminal Law is codified into Statute Law, and is not related to Common Law. So, Annett says his tribunals are not”mock trials” but they are, but virtue of the fact that tribunals are (in Canada) creatures of statute only. So, basically, what Annett is saying here, is circular nonsense.”

Okay, so it’s clear now that Annett doesn’t have a clue about what he’s talking about- but wait, there’s more!

The concept of common law is derived from English Law, a system that was spread far and wide back in the days of the British Empire; most Commonwealth countries still use common law today. If you’re the observant type, you’ve probably already noticed the problem here. Annett’s claims his court is based in Belgium- a country that’s never been part of the Commonwealth, nor a subject of the British monarchy. Belgium’s legal system is based on Napoleonic Code, they don’t use common law. So, basically, Annett’s claim of creating a common law court in Belgium is a poorly executed farce.

But, if your IQ is over 75, you’ve already figured that out by now- all it takes is one look at Annett broadcasting videos sitting on his throne…