Cascadian Subduction Zone NEW BUOY EVENT Update pg24 2-12-2016 4:54 am PT: USGS Mistake Shows 9.9 Earthquake Hitting The Geysers, California

The concept of tides seem to elude you, why is that?

You have had at least four posts in this thread spamming a certain radio station that is censored. Thanks in advance!

I am sorry about that I didn't realize that nothing happening when posting a link meant that something was censored.

Is there a way to program something that pops up saying "this link is censored"?

Anyway I apologize for that once again. I have no association with that site and saw the news and felt it was something that needed to get out there.

Luckily it is now on other non-censored sites!

Connect the dots?

Two strong volcanoes blow.

East Indonesia and Eastern Russia.

I am not finding any indication of other circa Juan de Fuca plate water movement on the NOAA map of nearby buoys.

Could someone provide a complete list of the buoys that showed a drop?

This seems to be in dispute.
Scientists saying one buoy and the OP suggesting up to six.

Thanks.

=======

Also.
Why would a Southern Hemisphere buoy, (55042), having a similar drop be of importance?

If no other movement in-between was indicated.

You're an asshole bro.

The news continues to gain traction...with very few officials debunking it.

[link to www.newsprepper.com]

"When the next very big earthquake hits, the northwest edge of the continent, from California to Canada and the continental shelf to the Cascades, will drop by as much as six feet and rebound thirty to a hundred feet to the west—losing, within minutes, all the elevation and compression it has gained over centuries. Some of that shift will take place beneath the ocean, displacing a colossal quantity of seawater. (Watch what your fingertips do when you flatten your hand.) The water will surge upward into a huge hill, then promptly collapse. One side will rush west, toward Japan. The other side will rush east, in a seven-hundred-mile liquid wall that will reach the Northwest coast, on average, fifteen minutes after the earthquake begins. By the time the shaking has ceased and the tsunami has receded, the region will be unrecognizable. Kenneth Murphy, who directs FEMA’s Region X, the division responsible for Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Alaska, says, “Our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast.”

In the Pacific Northwest, the area of impact will cover some hundred and forty thousand square miles, including Seattle, Tacoma, Portland, Eugene, Salem (the capital city of Oregon), Olympia (the capital of Washington), and some seven million people. When the next full-margin rupture happens, that region will suffer the worst natural disaster in the history of North America. Roughly three thousand people died in San Francisco’s 1906 earthquake. Almost two thousand died in Hurricane Katrina. Almost three hundred died in Hurricane Sandy. FEMA projects that nearly thirteen thousand people will die in the Cascadia earthquake and tsunami. Another twenty-seven thousand will be injured, and the agency expects that it will need to provide shelter for a million displaced people, and food and water for another two and a half million. “This is one time that I’m hoping all the science is wrong, and it won’t happen for another thousand years,” Murphy says."

UPDATE: I have attached a much better New Zealand buoy comparison below. Around 48 hours after the Oregon coast buoy registered the drop of the plate, a series of earthquakes struck near New Zealand registering 5.0 - 6.0 respectively.

Notice that AFTER the 5.0 - 6.0 quakes, the New Zealand buoy registers an extremely SIMILAR if not the SAME drop as the Oregon buoy:

:nzbuoydrop:

They are just laying the groundwork of beliefs that people will believe as the cause of a massive west coast earthquake and tsunami. Setting up an alibi so to say.

Their wiki lists the Pacific Ocean as 9,000 x 11,000 miles across.
Really?
They named their institutions NOAA (Noah) and USGS (jesus).
Really?

ALASKA = islamic mosque AL'ASQA
California = CALIPH

the biggest false flag in history is a lying sign and wonder brought to you by those who reject the son of God, Jesus Christ

Crap, I live in Portland. I need to move out of here soon.

"But the National Weather Service says not only are these drops normal — happening many times a day — this particular one was only 1 meter, or about 3 feet."

They aren't bothering to do much when its only one buoy in the Cascadia Subduction Zone.

If it was more than one they'd have to work at the denials.

If this was legit and its just one buoy all that would mean is that its a magma chamber collapse.

There are volcanoes off the coast and they need supply from somewhere.

tectonic plate theory is a myth

AC - Check out my post where I show screenshot proof that it was more than one buoy. All buoys on the Cascadian Subduction Zone show the SAME Juan De Fuca plate drop.

It is in page one or two of this thread.

For those of you talking about the tides, I present you with tide data for the morning of the 17th, when the drop occurred, of Tillamook Bay, Oregon, the closest point to the buoy:

[link to screencast.com]

[link to screencast.com]

This data is from the site: [link to tides.mobilegeographics.com]

As you can see the tide was not impacted by this drop. The buoy is too far away from shore to be affected by high tide / low tide.

IT IS NOT THE TIDES.

It's Aqsa

OK I did. Page two.

It shows a drop for Buoy 46404. CHECK

You didn't get the right screen for 46005 or 46003.

Nothing in the way of a drop for 46407 or 46411.

What is the proximity of any underwater volcanoes to the Buoy in question?

Magma Chamber makes sense.

Sorry about that, AC. Here's the raw data, at 02 30 00 for all stations notice the start of the drop and consistent drop for several hours. I cannot get the data from the remaining two stations - they have removed access to it. The significant wave height at the time was 20 ft.+ on all buoys. Here you can plainly see the drop registering on more than one station in the Cascadian Subduction Zone.

BUOY STATION 46404

2016 01 17 02 32 00 2 2738.705
2016 01 17 02 31 45 3 2738.731
2016 01 17 02 31 30 3 2738.730
2016 01 17 02 31 15 3 2738.724
2016 01 17 02 31 00 3 2738.713
2016 01 17 02 31 00 2 2738.725
2016 01 17 02 30 00 2 2738.699
2016 01 17 02 29 00 2 2738.698
2016 01 17 02 28 00 2 2738.708
2016 01 17 02 27 00 2 2738.709
2016 01 17 02 26 00 2 2738.716
2016 01 17 02 25 00 2 2738.720
2016 01 17 02 24 00 2 2738.728
2016 01 17 02 23 00 2 2738.723
2016 01 17 02 22 00 2 2738.733
2016 01 17 02 21 00 2 2738.721
2016 01 17 02 20 00 2 2738.726
2016 01 17 02 19 00 2 2738.730

BUOY STATION 46407

2016 01 17 03 45 00 1 3268.019
2016 01 17 03 30 00 1 3268.099
2016 01 17 03 15 00 1 3268.162
2016 01 17 03 00 00 1 3268.229
2016 01 17 02 45 00 1 3268.274
2016 01 17 02 30 00 1 3268.323
2016 01 17 02 15 00 1 3268.378
2016 01 17 02 00 00 1 3268.407

BUOY STATION 46005

2016 01 17 04 30 00 1 4287.319
2016 01 17 04 15 00 1 4287.365
2016 01 17 04 00 00 1 4287.418
2016 01 17 03 45 00 1 4287.464
2016 01 17 03 30 00 1 4287.525
2016 01 17 03 15 00 1 4287.585
2016 01 17 03 00 00 1 4287.635
2016 01 17 02 45 00 1 4287.696
2016 01 17 02 30 00 1 4287.738
2016 01 17 02 15 00 1 4287.778
2016 01 17 02 00 00 1 4287.832

They have removed access to it.


I can't fathom that.

Why would anyone want to hide information like that?

I can see someone hiding satellite data to falsify global warming.
I don't like that but its possible that is happening.


Why would their be a conspiracy here?

Knowledge of either a Cascadia preliminary event of a Magma drop isn't going to hurt someone's grant status. I would think the opposite.

King 5 news has a video of a mini tsunami on WA coast...related?

That is freaking weeeeeeeeird!! I can't seem to find it on King 5's site. Can you please link me AC??

King5 News Announces: 'Mini tsunami' along Washington coast caught on camera

[link to www.king5.com]

Wow

OMG Get out while you can. I mean, even without the faultline and tsunami stuff, the lack of jobs and high housing costs are enough of a reason. I was there once during a snow storm. The news warned it was coming and those jackasses made fun of the article in the comments, saying it never snows. Then it snowed and they all freaked out. It wasn't even that much snow, it just messed with the public transportation. Everyone was slipping and falling, hoarding bottled water like it was beyond thunderdome.

OP, you shouldn't take that news report of a mini-tsunami and associate it with an unreported earthquake or mysterious land movement. You should instead file that report as being about a storm front and the affect it had on the ocean.

Until I read the article in full, for awhile there I thought you may have been onto something and gotten a round-about confirmation of your suspicions a few days ago.






.

Dude, you obviously do not live on the ocean. If you did, you would know that wave was NOT due to a storm front. So whatever you may have read, think again. That wave was due to an underwater displacement event, not wind.

Volcano News Update
[link to volcanodiscovery.com] Info : Axial Seamount Volcano off the Coast of Oregon (Underwater) Article about possible Eruption in 2015 [link to livescience.com] Recent Earthquake Activity Pacific Northwest USA [link to pnsn.org]

I grew up in Cally and we were always told to brace for the BIG ONE, the San Andreas was going to rupture and send CA into the ocean? Now I live in the PNW and have been hearing now about the Cascadia? It reminds me of that skeleton holding the: "still waiting for nibiru" sign? lol
Sign should now read: "still waiting for San Andreas, Cascadia and Nibiru"?

Last Edited by UseLessRepEATER on 01/21/2016 03:12 AM