Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,263 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,293,632
Pageviews Today: 1,768,798Threads Today: 448Posts Today: 7,468
02:05 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Bishop Incident was not 'mugging'

 
KY6
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 168248
United Kingdom
12/11/2006 02:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Bishop Incident was not 'mugging'
[link to news.bbc.co.uk]

" Last Updated: Monday, 11 December 2006, 10:43 GMT

E-mail this to a friend Printable version

Bishop incident was 'not mugging'

The bishop suffered a badly bruised head
Police have said they are not treating an incident involving the Bishop of Southwark as a mugging.
The Right Reverend Tom Butler suffered head injuries and lost his mobile phone and briefcase after a drinks reception at the Irish embassy on 5 December.

He reported the matter to police thinking he been robbed near his home in Streatham, south London.

A Metropolitan Police spokesman said it was not being treated as a mugging but as a case of missing property.

In The Guardian newspaper the bishop is reported as saying: "The problem is, I don't remember anything. This has been a difficulty from the start.

A supposition

"I told the police I arrived home without my briefcase and with bruising on my face and a gash on the back of my head.

"I went to the doctor the next day and was told my injuries were consistent with a blow to the head, so I assumed I had been mugged, but that's a supposition. I am hoping the police will be able to be clearer."

Last week, a spokesman for the bishop said the prelate was so bruised in the attack he was not able to wear his mitre the following day.

On Monday, a spokesman for Mr Butler said: "The Bishop of Southwark attended a reception in Belgravia on Tuesday evening. He left the reception to travel home by public transport.

"When he arrived home he was without his briefcase and mobile phone and had several fresh head wounds. He reported the matter to the police and sought medical attention."

The police spokesman said: "Our inquiries are continuing into the incident, which is not being treated as a street robbery but as a case of missing property."


Later radio reports, (BBC Radio 4 sorry no link yet) suggested Bishop was drunk and tried to break into a car and was caught in the act by the owner scatering some kids toys about. Later his missing possessions including his Crosier and important document were found in the car.

Ah well, makes a change from quior boys!
KY6  (OP)

User ID: 168248
United Kingdom
12/11/2006 02:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bishop Incident was not 'mugging'
More on this:

[link to news.bbc.co.uk]

Police have said they are not treating an incident involving the Bishop of Southwark as a mugging.
The Right Reverend Tom Butler suffered head injuries and lost his mobile phone and briefcase after a drinks reception at the Irish embassy on 5 December.

He reported the matter to police thinking he was robbed near his home in Streatham, south London.

A Metropolitan Police spokesman said it was not being treated as a mugging but as a case of missing property.

Paul Sumpter was playing pool in a bar on, ironically, Crucifix Lane, in Bermondsey, when he heard his car alarm sound.

Baby toys

"I rushed out there and I saw an old looking guy with his legs hanging out the back of my car," said the property developer.

"My baby's toys were in the back seat and I could see him chucking them all about the place."

There was even a Ruth Rendell novel -- that was title End in Tears -- which was quite ironic

Paul Sumpter
After "dragging" him away, the man initially revealed himself as the Bishop of Woolwich before falling on the pavement and knocking his head which left him unconscious for about five minutes.

Mr Sumpter called an ambulance but the man left the scene before emergency crews arrived.

It was only days later that Mr Sumpter's wife discovered a briefcase belonging to Mr Butler, containing among other things, emails from the MoD and a letter from the Archbishop of Canterbury.

"There was even a Ruth Rendell novel - that was titled End in Tears - which was quite ironic. Plus it was in Crucifix Lane the whole thing happened as well."

In The Guardian newspaper the bishop is reported as saying: "The problem is, I don't remember anything. This has been a difficulty from the start.

A supposition

"I told the police I arrived home without my briefcase and with bruising on my face and a gash on the back of my head.

"I went to the doctor the next day and was told my injuries were consistent with a blow to the head, so I assumed I had been mugged, but that's a supposition. I am hoping the police will be able to be clearer."

On Monday, a spokesman for Mr Butler said: "The Bishop of Southwark attended a reception in Belgravia on Tuesday evening. He left the reception to travel home by public transport.

"When he arrived home he was without his briefcase and mobile phone and had several fresh head wounds. He reported the matter to the police and sought medical attention."

The spokesman said Mr Butler would not resign over the incident.
KY6  (OP)

User ID: 168248
United Kingdom
12/11/2006 02:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bishop Incident was not 'mugging'
The plot thickens!

[link to www.guardian.co.uk]

It's a fairly long read so I won't c/p it - go read for yourself if interested





GLP