NASA Moon Landing Hoax 100% Proof | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48553566 France 01/28/2017 02:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 52904278 Canada 01/28/2017 02:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you said no where in canada looks like the moon. so you've obviously never been to canada before, its not all snow and ice like you "imagine" , or "like other people who've never been to canada before tell you what canada looks like" A 20 some minute video? Believe me I have a life and I have spent much too much time on GLP today. Not your fault. If there is a pic and a location of a place in canada that looks like the moon I’d be glad to look. :p [link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)] [link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)] |
strgzr User ID: 23904624 United States 01/28/2017 02:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you said no where in canada looks like the moon. so you've obviously never been to canada before, its not all snow and ice like you "imagine" , or "like other people who've never been to canada before tell you what canada looks like" A 20 some minute video? Believe me I have a life and I have spent much too much time on GLP today. Not your fault. If there is a pic and a location of a place in canada that looks like the moon I’d be glad to look. :p [link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)] [link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)] Cool pics. I mean that. Why does that look like the moon to you? :) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 52904278 Canada 01/28/2017 02:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you said no where in canada looks like the moon. so you've obviously never been to canada before, its not all snow and ice like you "imagine" , or "like other people who've never been to canada before tell you what canada looks like" A 20 some minute video? Believe me I have a life and I have spent much too much time on GLP today. Not your fault. If there is a pic and a location of a place in canada that looks like the moon I’d be glad to look. :p [link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)] [link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)] location [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 52904278 Canada 01/28/2017 02:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52904278 you said no where in canada looks like the moon. so you've obviously never been to canada before, its not all snow and ice like you "imagine" , or "like other people who've never been to canada before tell you what canada looks like" A 20 some minute video? Believe me I have a life and I have spent much too much time on GLP today. Not your fault. If there is a pic and a location of a place in canada that looks like the moon I’d be glad to look. :p [link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)] [link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)] Cool pics. I mean that. Why does that look like the moon to you? ask nasa they are the ones who are always there practicing with moon equipment and taking pictures and training astronauts there |
strgzr User ID: 23904624 United States 01/28/2017 02:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52904278 you said no where in canada looks like the moon. so you've obviously never been to canada before, its not all snow and ice like you "imagine" , or "like other people who've never been to canada before tell you what canada looks like" A 20 some minute video? Believe me I have a life and I have spent much too much time on GLP today. Not your fault. If there is a pic and a location of a place in canada that looks like the moon I’d be glad to look. :p [link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)] [link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)] location [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] I love learning about my southern neighbor. :) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 52904278 Canada 01/28/2017 02:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: strgzr A 20 some minute video? Believe me I have a life and I have spent much too much time on GLP today. Not your fault. If there is a pic and a location of a place in canada that looks like the moon I’d be glad to look. :p [link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)] [link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)] location [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] I love learning about my southern neighbor. canada is your northern neighbor. unless your in alaska. then canda is your eastern or southern neighbor neighbor |
strgzr User ID: 23904624 United States 01/28/2017 02:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: strgzr A 20 some minute video? Believe me I have a life and I have spent much too much time on GLP today. Not your fault. If there is a pic and a location of a place in canada that looks like the moon I’d be glad to look. :p [link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)] [link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)] Cool pics. I mean that. Why does that look like the moon to you? ask nasa they are the ones who are always there practicing with moon equipment and taking pictures and training astronauts there It looks like a good place to practice. Are you a girl? :) |
strgzr User ID: 23904624 United States 01/28/2017 02:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52904278 I love learning about my southern neighbor. canada is your northern neighbor. unless your in alaska. then canda is your eastern or southern neighbor neighbor OMG you are… Yes I am in Alaska. :) |
MaybeTrollingU User ID: 73046289 Brazil 01/28/2017 02:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Things that are really interesting about "I hate NASA" tards: Quoting: MaybeTrollingU - Proof is ALWAYS a youtube video. Often followed by "undeniable", "100%" and terms like that. But interestingly enough, any video showing the opposite of their belief, its labeled "fake", as if they have a natural ability to distinguish. - The obcession for pictures and videos is astonishing. If you try and tell them that about 80% of the work and research done in space is about anything else except pictures and videos. Space is not the freaking Grand Canyon, it has lots and lots of properties to be studied. "Like what" you may say. X-rays, gamma-rays, radiation and many, many others. - Also the linguistic bends. "Do your research" is the same as "watch several hours of video on youtube". "Take your own conclusions" is the same as "agree with me or you are a shill". The generic terms are also very common. "Scientists say..." and "An experiment has been conducted..." are among the top ones. - Just like "flat earth tards" and "mandela effect tards", most of them are not graduated. They think that eyes and years are the tools anyone need to discover anything about the universe. What a small universe they must live in... To prove my point I have a list of things that might be said about these statements above. In no specific order: - SHILLL!!!! GTFO!!! - Prove these videos are wrong(meaning "I'm right, no matter what you say") - (Some generic insults) - I don't need to be graduated to question science! - Science lies, period. I'm right, you're wrong! - Just look at the videos! There might be some others, but the message will be that I'm wrong, no matter what. What do you do for work? Besides try to convince others there is no God, that you come from apes, and that NASA is some legit organization? I'll assume you're not graduated, so "google scholar" might be out of your scope. How about changing your approach and do ACTUAL scientific research, or at least learn how it works. Google scholar is free and you can look for ANY subject you want there, including "moon landing", "evolution" and so on. And answering your questions: - I'm nowadays working as a software developer - There is a God. But the whatever thing you think as God, this, doesn't exist. - Men didn't came from apes, again, google scholar. - NASA might lie about many subjects, but we actually went to the moon. |
strgzr User ID: 23904624 United States 01/28/2017 02:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Things that are really interesting about "I hate NASA" tards: Quoting: MaybeTrollingU - Proof is ALWAYS a youtube video. Often followed by "undeniable", "100%" and terms like that. But interestingly enough, any video showing the opposite of their belief, its labeled "fake", as if they have a natural ability to distinguish. - The obcession for pictures and videos is astonishing. If you try and tell them that about 80% of the work and research done in space is about anything else except pictures and videos. Space is not the freaking Grand Canyon, it has lots and lots of properties to be studied. "Like what" you may say. X-rays, gamma-rays, radiation and many, many others. - Also the linguistic bends. "Do your research" is the same as "watch several hours of video on youtube". "Take your own conclusions" is the same as "agree with me or you are a shill". The generic terms are also very common. "Scientists say..." and "An experiment has been conducted..." are among the top ones. - Just like "flat earth tards" and "mandela effect tards", most of them are not graduated. They think that eyes and years are the tools anyone need to discover anything about the universe. What a small universe they must live in... To prove my point I have a list of things that might be said about these statements above. In no specific order: - SHILLL!!!! GTFO!!! - Prove these videos are wrong(meaning "I'm right, no matter what you say") - (Some generic insults) - I don't need to be graduated to question science! - Science lies, period. I'm right, you're wrong! - Just look at the videos! There might be some others, but the message will be that I'm wrong, no matter what. What do you do for work? Besides try to convince others there is no God, that you come from apes, and that NASA is some legit organization? I'll assume you're not graduated, so "google scholar" might be out of your scope. How about changing your approach and do ACTUAL scientific research, or at least learn how it works. Google scholar is free and you can look for ANY subject you want there, including "moon landing", "evolution" and so on. And answering your questions: - I'm nowadays working as a software developer - There is a God. But the whatever thing you think as God, this, doesn't exist. - Men didn't came from apes, again, google scholar. - NASA might lie about many subjects, but we actually went to the moon. What in the hell are you talking about. :) |
MaybeTrollingU User ID: 73046289 Brazil 01/28/2017 02:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Things that are really interesting about "I hate NASA" tards: Quoting: MaybeTrollingU - Proof is ALWAYS a youtube video. Often followed by "undeniable", "100%" and terms like that. But interestingly enough, any video showing the opposite of their belief, its labeled "fake", as if they have a natural ability to distinguish. - The obcession for pictures and videos is astonishing. If you try and tell them that about 80% of the work and research done in space is about anything else except pictures and videos. Space is not the freaking Grand Canyon, it has lots and lots of properties to be studied. "Like what" you may say. X-rays, gamma-rays, radiation and many, many others. - Also the linguistic bends. "Do your research" is the same as "watch several hours of video on youtube". "Take your own conclusions" is the same as "agree with me or you are a shill". The generic terms are also very common. "Scientists say..." and "An experiment has been conducted..." are among the top ones. - Just like "flat earth tards" and "mandela effect tards", most of them are not graduated. They think that eyes and years are the tools anyone need to discover anything about the universe. What a small universe they must live in... To prove my point I have a list of things that might be said about these statements above. In no specific order: - SHILLL!!!! GTFO!!! - Prove these videos are wrong(meaning "I'm right, no matter what you say") - (Some generic insults) - I don't need to be graduated to question science! - Science lies, period. I'm right, you're wrong! - Just look at the videos! There might be some others, but the message will be that I'm wrong, no matter what. What do you do for work? Besides try to convince others there is no God, that you come from apes, and that NASA is some legit organization? I'll assume you're not graduated, so "google scholar" might be out of your scope. How about changing your approach and do ACTUAL scientific research, or at least learn how it works. Google scholar is free and you can look for ANY subject you want there, including "moon landing", "evolution" and so on. And answering your questions: - I'm nowadays working as a software developer - There is a God. But the whatever thing you think as God, this, doesn't exist. - Men didn't came from apes, again, google scholar. - NASA might lie about many subjects, but we actually went to the moon. What in the hell are you talking about. About what? I covered many subjects in those posts... |
Expose ALL Shills User ID: 18554737 United States 01/28/2017 02:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Things that are really interesting about "I hate NASA" tards: Quoting: MaybeTrollingU - Proof is ALWAYS a youtube video. Often followed by "undeniable", "100%" and terms like that. But interestingly enough, any video showing the opposite of their belief, its labeled "fake", as if they have a natural ability to distinguish. - The obcession for pictures and videos is astonishing. If you try and tell them that about 80% of the work and research done in space is about anything else except pictures and videos. Space is not the freaking Grand Canyon, it has lots and lots of properties to be studied. "Like what" you may say. X-rays, gamma-rays, radiation and many, many others. - Also the linguistic bends. "Do your research" is the same as "watch several hours of video on youtube". "Take your own conclusions" is the same as "agree with me or you are a shill". The generic terms are also very common. "Scientists say..." and "An experiment has been conducted..." are among the top ones. - Just like "flat earth tards" and "mandela effect tards", most of them are not graduated. They think that eyes and years are the tools anyone need to discover anything about the universe. What a small universe they must live in... To prove my point I have a list of things that might be said about these statements above. In no specific order: - SHILLL!!!! GTFO!!! - Prove these videos are wrong(meaning "I'm right, no matter what you say") - (Some generic insults) - I don't need to be graduated to question science! - Science lies, period. I'm right, you're wrong! - Just look at the videos! There might be some others, but the message will be that I'm wrong, no matter what. What do you do for work? Besides try to convince others there is no God, that you come from apes, and that NASA is some legit organization? I'll assume you're not graduated, so "google scholar" might be out of your scope. How about changing your approach and do ACTUAL scientific research, or at least learn how it works. Google scholar is free and you can look for ANY subject you want there, including "moon landing", "evolution" and so on. And answering your questions: - I'm nowadays working as a software developer - There is a God. But the whatever thing you think as God, this, doesn't exist. - Men didn't came from apes, again, google scholar. - NASA might lie about many subjects, but we actually went to the moon. Why do you believe there is a God? live and die for Christ |
MaybeTrollingU User ID: 73115228 Brazil 01/28/2017 02:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Things that are really interesting about "I hate NASA" tards: Quoting: MaybeTrollingU - Proof is ALWAYS a youtube video. Often followed by "undeniable", "100%" and terms like that. But interestingly enough, any video showing the opposite of their belief, its labeled "fake", as if they have a natural ability to distinguish. - The obcession for pictures and videos is astonishing. If you try and tell them that about 80% of the work and research done in space is about anything else except pictures and videos. Space is not the freaking Grand Canyon, it has lots and lots of properties to be studied. "Like what" you may say. X-rays, gamma-rays, radiation and many, many others. - Also the linguistic bends. "Do your research" is the same as "watch several hours of video on youtube". "Take your own conclusions" is the same as "agree with me or you are a shill". The generic terms are also very common. "Scientists say..." and "An experiment has been conducted..." are among the top ones. - Just like "flat earth tards" and "mandela effect tards", most of them are not graduated. They think that eyes and years are the tools anyone need to discover anything about the universe. What a small universe they must live in... To prove my point I have a list of things that might be said about these statements above. In no specific order: - SHILLL!!!! GTFO!!! - Prove these videos are wrong(meaning "I'm right, no matter what you say") - (Some generic insults) - I don't need to be graduated to question science! - Science lies, period. I'm right, you're wrong! - Just look at the videos! There might be some others, but the message will be that I'm wrong, no matter what. What do you do for work? Besides try to convince others there is no God, that you come from apes, and that NASA is some legit organization? I'll assume you're not graduated, so "google scholar" might be out of your scope. How about changing your approach and do ACTUAL scientific research, or at least learn how it works. Google scholar is free and you can look for ANY subject you want there, including "moon landing", "evolution" and so on. And answering your questions: - I'm nowadays working as a software developer - There is a God. But the whatever thing you think as God, this, doesn't exist. - Men didn't came from apes, again, google scholar. - NASA might lie about many subjects, but we actually went to the moon. Why do you believe there is a God? Let me be specific: The god from the bible, this one, doesn't exists. God, the real one, is WAAAAAAAAY out of the scope of human comprehension. There is no "Why", there is no "how", God simply is. But again, this one you (probably) believe in, this one is not real. The more you study about the universe, physics, byology and all other branches of science, the more you see how small this god from the bible is. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70716888 Sweden 01/28/2017 04:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So if we never went to the moon, who left all the tracks at the various landing sites that can be seen with satellites? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 51812183 Maybe photos were faked but we still went there. You can see the landing sites from space. This seems to be a popular debunking answer. Yet no one seems to have seen it for themselves. Just talk... Why don't you provide a link to 1 single satellite image of all those tracks? (or stop spreading lies) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73850734 France 01/28/2017 11:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73850734 France 01/28/2017 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73850734 France 01/28/2017 12:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Davos User ID: 73854935 United Kingdom 01/28/2017 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69731773 United States 01/28/2017 12:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73085799 United States 01/28/2017 01:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73850734 France 01/28/2017 01:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 68914848 Netherlands 01/28/2017 02:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to NASA website info, all Apollo moon landings are done at moon's morning. The sun is about 13 degree above the horizon Quoting: Anonymous OP 59686777 This is an incorrect statement. Sun angles during lunar EVAs varied from 7.5 to 48.7 degrees. [link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)] Why do you believe that incorrect data is a useful basis for any analysis? True Story. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69540926 I'm a 45 year old mother. Someone else mention it in passing about the faked moon landing. I had an 18 year old look at me in question, like is that true. I looked at her and said, I'm not going into that right now, Just the next time you look at one of those pictures; Why aren't there any stars in those pictures? Once she came across a picture, a couple of days later she came to me and said that there are no stars. How can that be? Her final question to me was, Why did other countries say they went to the moon, too? My answer, profit and ego. So that makes two persons who don't know why there aren't stars in most of the images and couldn't be bothered to find out. Why do you believe that not knowing or understanding something proves anything? First you ask a question, indicating that you don't know something. Then you you claim to know that exact something without any proof. Why do you believe ignorance and asspullery is a useful basis for an argument? Why do you believe that lies are useful? Mirrors are not needed to reflect a laser off the Moon. Physicists did it way back in the... 50's? Quoting: UK Coward 73648370 Why do you believe that scientists are to stupid to tell different kinds of reflection apart? Why don't you provide a link to 1 single satellite image of all those tracks? Quoting: Swedish Coward 70716888 Why do you believe that being lazy and/or inept at research is a proper approach to truth finding? Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73850734 France 01/28/2017 02:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to NASA website info, all Apollo moon landings are done at moon's morning. The sun is about 13 degree above the horizon Quoting: Anonymous OP 59686777 This is an incorrect statement. Sun angles during lunar EVAs varied from 7.5 to 48.7 degrees. [link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)] Why do you believe that incorrect data is a useful basis for any analysis? Does 48.7 degree sun angle cast shadow right under any object? No. 90 degree sun angle casts shadow right under any object. NASA lied moon landing for sure, fool. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73085799 United States 01/28/2017 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to NASA website info, all Apollo moon landings are done at moon's morning. The sun is about 13 degree above the horizon Quoting: Anonymous OP 59686777 This is an incorrect statement. Sun angles during lunar EVAs varied from 7.5 to 48.7 degrees. [link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)] Why do you believe that incorrect data is a useful basis for any analysis? Does 48.7 degree sun angle cast shadow right under any object? No. 90 degree sun angle casts shadow right under any object. NASA lied moon landing for sure, fool. No pictures show shadows with a 90 degree sun. you haven't shown any lies |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73850734 France 01/28/2017 02:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to NASA website info, all Apollo moon landings are done at moon's morning. The sun is about 13 degree above the horizon Quoting: Anonymous OP 59686777 This is an incorrect statement. Sun angles during lunar EVAs varied from 7.5 to 48.7 degrees. [link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)] Why do you believe that incorrect data is a useful basis for any analysis? Does 48.7 degree sun angle cast shadow right under any object? No. 90 degree sun angle casts shadow right under any object. NASA lied moon landing for sure, fool. No pictures show shadows with a 90 degree sun. you haven't shown any lies Liar. 3.33 to 3.53 the sun is 90 degree. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73850734 France 01/28/2017 02:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73085799 United States 01/28/2017 02:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD This is an incorrect statement. Sun angles during lunar EVAs varied from 7.5 to 48.7 degrees. [link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)] Why do you believe that incorrect data is a useful basis for any analysis? Does 48.7 degree sun angle cast shadow right under any object? No. 90 degree sun angle casts shadow right under any object. NASA lied moon landing for sure, fool. No pictures show shadows with a 90 degree sun. you haven't shown any lies Liar. 3.33 to 3.53 the sun is 90 degree. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] no they aren't. There are two clips in that time period. In the first the shadows are toward the camera and harder to see with the low viewing angle but the sun is definitely not right above them as you can see it shining on one side of their suits. The second clip is more obvious from the side. First, the viewing angle is low so it is harder to see the shadows but they are NOT 90 degree. Second, are you a flattie? They also seem to have the same lack of spatial recognition as you. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48553566 France 01/28/2017 02:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48553566 France 01/28/2017 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |