Apollo moon landing 10,000 lbs thrust: Opsssss...... is the lunar surface paved with concrete or powder soft silicon?

You got em

You're not very bright. The moon is made from rock, covered by a small layer of lunar dust.

Idiot

That YOU are.

Son , for the last fucking time , I told you santa clause is not real, me and your mother apologise for making you sit on his lap until grade school , did not know at the time it would effect you like this

10,000 lb thrust doesn't blast away a thin layer of dust but a feather duster does? BTW the LM's shadow extends to the moon's horizon, isn't the moon at least a mile around or.....?

Last Edited by DGN on 09/26/2017 10:32 AM

You were told on the very first page that it doesn't land with 10,000 pounds of thrust.

Are all Jehovah's Witnesses as backward retarded as you?

Yes.

Again, you fekking moron, there was no "10,000 lb of thrust."


It did blast away a thin layer of dust, you fekking moron.
We can see it happening.
We can see the effects in the photos.

Keyword here being AWAY.
The dust was blown AWAY form the LM.
There is no way it could have turned around to fall on the LM.


Prove it, you fekking moron.

THE LM?
Are you one of the hopeless who don't even know there were 6 manned moonlandings?


You're wrongitude knows no limits.
Have you ever been right about anything?

You can always see a fake horizon in these early transmissions, if you were stood in a field you would never be able to see the horizon like this, so fake.

Like a thorn in your side

Hope he doesn't back up he could fall off the edge of the moon.

dude...think 1/6 gravity! The lander motor was at a fraction of it's full thrust. (it was throttleable, you do know that, right?)
Add to that no atmosphere, so the dust was blown straight out away in all directions from the area below the engine bell. It won't "billow" without an atmosphere...

It's because of low gravity the dust would billow much higher and further. Yes the dust would blow out in all directions, if there really was a rocket pointed down at it. Even the Rover's tires kicked up dust, which had no hang time.

Hey OP, what's the official view of the JW on the fake as moon landings?

...do you know how wide the exhaust plume for the LMs DPS was at landing? Look up "overexpansion in vacuum" in your spaceflight dictionary.
Also do some math on the power/thrust needed to land the LM with nearly empty DPS fuel tanks.

Billowing is an atmospheric phenomenon...you need to get your head around "vacuum". and how things work there.

i don't think the fuel tank was large enough to get them back into lunar orbit.

They never went to the moon.

The only force affecting billowing is gravity, no gravity and the dust would float indefinitely, no moon landing, no rocket,no billowing.

That's entirely individual.

That piece of shit never flew or landed anywhere, just look at it!

Yeah: that was a second rocket engine. The crew compartment of the lem separated from the base (with the legs and left it behind on the moon. ) There's this new thing called the internet..
.

yur funny...in a sad sort of way

these hoaxies really show deep knowledge of the subject, don't they? ;)

why do you lie? Billowing requires an atmosphere.
And the dust kicked up by the rover fell at exactly the rate it should in the low gravity and in nice parabolic arcs.

Then prove it. You'd be the first. All the info needed is available online. You'll need their takeoff weight, the performance of the ascent engine, and the amount of fuel available. Doubt you'll even try though.

That book can't possibly be any good. It has such a boring cover.

How many official-story believers "really show deep knowledge of the subject"?

Find some random people, ask if they believe that Neil and Buzz walked on the Moon with the Apollo 11 program, and if they say "yes", then ask them for a description of the LM's engines. See how detailed an answer they give you.

I’ve enjoyed watching a lot of Apollo moon footage. Narrated both pro and con, hoax or not. Catch me on the right day and I can believe either side. I always come back to remembering watching it happen in real time. Or at least as real time as technology allowed then. The moon landings happened. I was a witness.

Maybe the doubt comes because we all know in our hearts we are being lied to about the space program. The moon hoax is another distraction.

Who thinks that manned exploration of space stopped after Apollo? I don’t. NASA has always been the PR wing of the military space program.

Yet pieces of shit can type on a keyboard.