I was hoping for more.

As far as i can see the memo clearly says one or more of tbe people who put the dossier togetber were clearly biased. It also says others who applied for warrants neglected to be up front about that bias. Because of this a warrant was granted that should not have been granted if the whole picture was known.

What's missing IMHO:
None of this clearly called out as a crime, felony etc. Words used are "improperly" and "failed to disclose".

No one outright accused of sedition or treason. Not saying those things didn't happen, but they are not directly alleged in plain language.

The big, obvious take-away is the dossier cannot be used as evidence of wrongdoing by the target of the surveilance i.e. Trump. That's pretty clear.

I don't see anything "sickening" unless one has a physical revulsion to paperwork errors and political shenanigans.

Most people are sickened by brutal crimes and acts against nature. Was expecting that, rather than someone fibbed on a form.