Mandela Effect: Professor gives lecture on how they are changing the past to CONTROL the future

It actually is 'normal' to those that have experienced it since childhood as they know no other way.

Personally I believe some schizophrenics actually are physical mediums that are unable to handle or become damaged by their experiences.

The first time I came upon a murder scene and was aware the decedents body was hidden beside the road was a shock though.

Yes. Reverberations from the great awakening in the near future (hopefully) ripple back in time much like the waves a pebble would make if dropped in the center of a still pond. The interval between waves increasing in proportion to the distance (time) from impact.

The late 60's was one such consciousness raising period. I was 16 in 1969, the year Woodstock happened. I was too young to just up and go there, but the vibe was intense throughout that period. Music was going through a renaissance, popular culture was open to unlimitted possibilities. The 70's and capitalism ruined all that. A definate ripple-back in time though.


Other waves back from the future could have been the Harmonic Convergence of 1987, or the Harmnic Concordance of 2003. The hype of 2012 might also have been a portend of some great future consciousness awakening event that will bring us back from quarantine into the universal circuits.

If you add this to the mix it gets even more complex

We're an alien race who is reading the record of a dead race to keep from making the same mistakes?

Hey just wanted to say that out of all the mean, angry people here you actually seem like a nice guy. That's all

Thank you!!

This is me in real life too!

Ted is my AV because he portrays the eternal being Michael on TV trying to save four condemned souls now and will win an Emmy award for that role. I've got a link in my signature.

Last Edited by Louis in Richmond on 09/01/2018 02:06 AM

...because there wouldn't be physical evidence in real Mandela effect cases, since physical reality would have changed (just not your consciousness, and thus memory of the original event). If that will always be your answer, why even bother with the topic knowing there CAN'T be physical evidence...? Seems you're wasting your time.

Because history needs an anchor, a zero mile marker from which all is measured.

And because truth must be preserved.

Last Edited by Louis in Richmond on 09/01/2018 05:13 AM

Are you aware of how "crazy" that sounds to most people? It would be like me trying to describe the sound of a loon to someone who has never heard a loon before... "unworldly" to say the least. I mean, you sound certifiable. I don't doubt what you're saying but you must be aware of how odd it sounds, right? I'll bet you have people in your family that has this same "gift"as well. It wouldn't surprise me in the least. You seem to handle it quite well. It's kinda cool that you can be open about it and share.

We're all bat-sheet crazy you know?

Interesting what you said about Schizos. I agree with you btw.

I think I will call you 'Sam'

Thank you TCS. 'Been called crazy for it many times.

Yet it is what it is. Have a great day!

But "if" there is physical evidence then that implies something waaay more sinister than what the mandela effect is supposed to actually be.

On the actual timeline changes, but your consciousness not being version (however you're protected/unchanged); there's science theories universes are constantly nudging against each other...potentially even changing timelines, but would you notice? There could be literally trillions of changes each day, but the universe is so big/expansive and its timeline so huge that it could happen everyday and nobody would even know. Would you know if one random tiny bit of your history changed, never mind some minor change to a guy's history 10 thousand years ago? Or change to some planet on the other side of the universe...? You wouldn't, would you? So assuming it's actual timeline changes and not the former "something more sinister" for all these noticable changes showing up on one tiny planet at one specific timeframe by so many...it sort of implies deliberate intent to cause changes somehow.

Unless it's all just in our heads/bs/manipulations.

Makes sense. It is the past that has changed and this changes the present.

With gump was is past tense so why would the living use a past tense to their kid when explaining the present. The mother was giving advice for the present and future. Was is past Is is now and future.

When you think of explaining something's to your kid's before you die you don't use the past but present tense.

Life was a box of chocolate that's the dead telling the living how to live.. Is will and is the right word

Mirror mirror was the chant to waken the dead to respond.
Magic mirror.. Well if the mirror was magic no need for the evil woman to chant.. that magic mirror would Grant her any wish but no tells her who is fine. So mirror was not magic only magic was the story line.

What worries me about this is the conversations that have changed. Numerous times I have had conversations with people that they later claim never happened.

Pharmacist told me one of my meds was ceasing production because there are better options available and he didn't remember it.

Postal employee and I had a conversation about mailing requirements INCLUDING going through the regulations in the regulations books and apparently that never happened either, in fact the rules are the exact opposite.

That's just two of the more memorable ones. Over the past few years I've learned to just observe and not interact when these things come up.