Prove Earth rotates and win a PRIZE---A REAL FUCKEN MACHINE GUN with Bullets too!!!!

I don't know.

Your grandfather was a pioneer in the US space program (Explorer) with the early Redstone team...that puts him in very historic company. I'm not sure why he would tell you the Earth was flat, but many civilian companies have very many satellites in orbit which enable worldwide data and voice communications.
How are we able to see the ISS go over on schedule? And folks 100 miles away (north/south/east/west)can see it too?
Have you gone to the ISS sighting page to see when it's visible in your area?

big difference between LEO and actual space, bro

Can you debunk how ships can see a lighthouse 200 miles away, given the curvature of the earth?

Do railroad engineers account for the curvature of the earth when they lay track?

My great grandpa said Earth was flat. He also didn't believe the Military NASA control going to the moon story. Both are dead right now. Whats yer point? I knew my great grandpa was a wise man, he followed the Indian's spirituality

Whats yer point?

please explain this difference between LEO and space, and, yes, there are some differences...where does LEO stop, and where does "space" begin, in your view?

and why would the rocket slowly curve towards horizontal and gain altitude after launching? ...serious question.

OP's response to the Foucault Pendulum:

I never really studied a lot of Eric Dubay but I hear he has a lot of good information on the subject.

I have studied the gaping holes in the scientific theories of how the universe works for about 20 years now though and you're right.

Most of these arguments are grasping at straws.

like the one goober that is reliant on a Wikipedia article but insinuating that he has an engineering degree of some sort.

He refuses to accept any contradictory evidence but keeps proclaiming victory for no apparent reason.

Last I checked, people with actual degrees wouldn't wipe their ass with Wikipedia because of it's rampant errors.

It's because they are cowards that want to believe the lie.

It's not.

Gravity is a pseudo-science theory describing nothing more than density and buoyancy.

Gravity (from Latin gravitas, meaning 'weight'), or gravitation, is a natural phenomenon by which all things with mass or energy—including planets, stars, galaxies, and even light—are brought toward (or gravitate toward) one another.

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

So for gravity to be a real thing, that is repeatable via experimentation, then it is demonstrate the ability to attract two objects such as a . . . say a bowling ball and a pea.

In theory, "all things with mass" should be "bought toward" each other.

I guarantee that you can set a pea and a bowling ball next to each other for years and with out the aid of wind or some external force, there will be no attraction.

Here's another fun example i like to use that shreds gravity too.

If gravity is indeed a force that attracts one to the planet Earth then it would seem to reason that that force would tug harder, the further one is away from the surface of the Earth. Now go weigh yourself on the ground (surface of the Earth) then go weigh yourself on the top floor of a high rise building. If you don't weigh more on the 10th floor than you do on the ground floor then gravity is not doing it's job.

Read the previous post dumbass.

That entire premis is based on the Coriolis effect.

If the Coriolis effect is a real thing, then air travel as we know it is impossible.

Read my earlier post for a detailed explanation of these principles.

Antarctica . . . that shows the ignorance of most globetards.

Where's the edge?

Do some research and come back when you can have an actual fact-oriented debate.

Last Edited by Nawt Meh Prezdunt on 01/06/2019 04:30 AM

All Foucault's Pendulums utilize an external power supply and drive. They don't work. There is an excellent video on YouTube where the museum housing one clearly stated this.

DO SOME RESEARCH PEOPLE!!

You are a fucking dipshit, and a wholesale liar, to boot.. now go ahead and give me some red, you pouty little lizard dick.

Rockets don’t work without an atmosphere so have to start going horizontal due to the lack of atmosphere with increase height. Don’t be fooled. The rocket is not throwing father exhaust out like a person throwing a ball, an analogy often given. Combustion of fuel merely creates high pressure causing a pressure differential between the rocket and the outside. The exhaust dissipates it’s pressure to low pressure. When gas dissipates into a vacuum, no work is done and no thrust is generated.

Wind moves due to pressure differential. When wind blows on your face, did the air behind you push back on you head when it moved? Where’s the equal and opposite reaction?

Auto correct causes more mistakes than fixing them

What more proof needs?



[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

This guy jumped from the stratosphere.
Out of the 148 minutes of the flight he spent about 40 minutes "over the Armstrong limit" in the space.
Of course, the Earth rotated during all this time underneath him, with the rotation speed of 1000 miles per hour, then he must have landed at the very least 6-700 miles away from his launching point.

Or...did he?

The official data:

Launch site:
Roswell International Air Center, Roswell, New Mexico, United States

Coordinates
Launch site:
33.3109°N 104.5392°W

Landing site:
33.3580°N 103.7849°W

Wow...That is only 55.1 miles!

How is that possible???

Last Edited by Emerald_Glow 2.0 on 01/06/2019 11:33 AM

My apologies, I misunderstood your post.

This is interesting. These experiments with the aether in the 19th century assumed light was a wave, and therefore needed a medium to propagate. Then came quantum mechanics, and the wave-particle duality.

It takes a true moron to believe that the sun travels over 24 million miles per hour to make it's daily rotation LOL. More distant objects even more incredible rates of speed. Let us pray for the morons...

Mama says alligators is angry because they got all them teeth and no tooth brush...

You're not taking into account wind nor that he was able to control his speed and direction while falling.

Space isn't a vacuum.

Some have a small linear motor to overcome friction to keep the pendulum swinging, but 100% of the rotation is from the earth. It is on a bearing which is free to rotate.

The amount of rotation is proportional to latitude. On the equator there is no rotation. On the north or south poles, there is 360 degrees rotation every 24 hours.

On the north pole it rotates clockwise; on the south pole counter-clockwise.

Give it up flat-earth-tards.

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

I expect your response to these facts to be

or

Last Edited by Monty Python on 01/06/2019 07:05 PM

He was moving with the earth before taking off. Why should he stop that movement after?

...Are you familar with under sea cables carrying 99% of communications traffic?

This isnt about how many star's a lense can see.

But, would you agree some stars that are brighter in the night sky are farther away than some that are dimmer?

Jetstream flows east. I don't know, just a thought.

wind and AGAIN he wouldn't stop the movement with the Earth just because he took off. Momentum is still a thing. But thanks for proving you didn't read the post you replied to.

Last Edited by LHP598 on 01/06/2019 05:55 PM