|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
The real problem with the moon landings is not that they are clearly faked and that today the fakery is laughably poor.
It's not even that every single aspect is fake and can be taken apart even by a small child.
Quoting: Drone#6 And, wondering which town is scheduled for the next directed energy weapons display of power. I don't like proving or disproving one subject by discussing the validity of an entirely different subject. It's also logically impossible and irrelevant, start a new thread about new subjects. Lets stick to the Apollo moon story here and let the pro-NASA people present the evidence for their outlandish claims that they went to the moon. The problem all pro-NASA Apollo people have is that there is simply zero credible evidence that they went. ZERO. None at all. Their arguments all end with 'Trust NASA and material from NASA'. There's more evidence that Gerry Anderson's Thunderbirds is real than for Apollo. Zero evidence you accept you mean... there is plenty of evidence, including other space agency's confirmation, but you ignore what you choose to. Are you a flat earth space denier tard?
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
