Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,319 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,316,998
Pageviews Today: 1,802,178Threads Today: 459Posts Today: 7,673
02:19 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
Poster Handle Violetag
Post Content
The real problem with the moon landings is not that they are clearly faked and that today the fakery is laughably poor.
It's not even that every single aspect is fake and can be taken apart even by a small child.

The real problem NASA have (apart from the obvious one of having to fight their own illusory past) is that the whole 'we landed on the moon half a century ago' story has now become extremely boring plus the millennial generation really has no reason to care.

Apathy, derision and being ignored are far greater threats to NASA's efforts to spin their moon fantasy than they fact they can't prove a single one of their claims and they have been caught destroying evidence such as the original video tapes and telemetry data: i.e. the detailed proof.

It also doesn't help their case that the US authorities are working hard to teach the world that they are compulsive liars and cheats, and that they are causing so much suffering that even if it was true no one would care either. It's tricky to care about lunar exploration when you're shivering in a tent city wondering where your middle class lifestyle went, or huddling in the wreck of your city with bombs and missiles of 'freedom and democracy' raining down.

The NASA moon mission is completely fake: that's a simple fact, but it has less importance than both sides think it does, it's just another lie.
 Quoting: Drone#6


I liked the part where the Nasa guy explained it would be a problem to get outside the radiationbelt now because they "destroyed" the tech they had to do that in the past.

So they cant do anymore what they could do 50 years ago lol sounds legit.

There was a post here awhile back linking to a guy from nasa explaining why the radiationbelt would be a problem "now" when trying to go to mars.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP