The Fossil and Sedimentary Record were created during the Deluge, not during millions of years of "evolution"

One of the biggest lies in history is the evolutionary theory laid down by amateur geologist Charles Lyell, which peddled the notion that Earth’s fossil-bearing sedimentary record had been laid down gradually and that consequently the layers of rock that they studied must have been formed over immense periods of time:

"...the surprising discovery of soft tissue in fossils presumed to be millions of years old brings radiometric dating into direct contradiction with currently observed decay rates of organic materials. In 2005 and 2007, evolutionary scientist Mary Schweitzer reported on the discovery of what appeared to be blood cells in 65 million years old tyrannosaur bones. This presented a quandary for scientists, because organic material is not supposed to last that long based upon present decay rates. When her work was called into question, Dr. Schweitzer obtained similar tissue in 80 million year old hadrosaur bones, went to extraordinary lengths to prevent contamination and perform rigorous tests on her samples, and defended her discovery in an article in Science that appears to have satisfied her detractors.

In a study published in April 2011, researchers in Sweden subjected soft tissue from a presumed 70 million year old mosasaur to a battery of tests to determine if the material was original to the organism. Not only did they confirm that the tissue was indeed original, but the fibrous tissue absorbed dye just like connective tissue from a modern bone. Additionally, as chemist Dr. Jay Wile pointed out, the results came from a small bone found in sediments that should have been soaked in water for a long time, which makes it extremely hard to believe that the fossil had any special conditions that would help keep soft tissue and proteins from decaying away relatively quickly. The survival of soft tissue under such conditions clearly demonstrates the conflict between known decay rates of organic material and the fossil’s age as determined by radiometric dating...

...Besides being found in massive quantities, fossils are often discovered in incredible states of preservation. Fossils have been found of marine reptiles giving birth, eggs with preserved embryos inside them, fish eating other fish, and even fossilized animal droppings. This mass preservation is difficult for geologists to explain because it is not the natural order. They often postulate local floods as a mechanism of fossilization, but it is fair to say that no flood, tsunami, or hurricane in recorded history has preserved the remains of organisms in the quantities and state of preservation seen in the fossil record....

...Geologist J Harlan Bretz noticed in the early part of the 20th century that features of the channeled scablands area of Washington could only have been produced by an enormous flood, far beyond the scope and magnitude of anything ever witnessed historically. In the face of immense scorn and criticism from his peers, who couldn’t believe there could have been any event so catastrophic, he persevered in defending his theory, and lived to see his views accepted by the geologic community. Sadly, however, only a few of those who originally disbelieved him ever changed their opinions.

The Lake Missoula megaflood demonstrates that erosion can occur quickly, as do historically witnessed events of rapid canyon formation. For example, shortly after the 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens, a mudflow eroded a canyon system up to 140 feet deep in the headwaters of the North Fork of the Toutle River Valley.

Large-scale erosional features such as the Grand Canyon could form in a short period of time, though the depth of the Grand Canyon suggests erosion on a much greater scale than the above examples..." [link to kolbecenter.org]