| Users Online Now: 1,340 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 291,744 | |
| Pageviews Today: 383,742 | Threads Today: 122 | Posts Today: 1,492 |
| 03:17 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,340 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 291,744 | |
| Pageviews Today: 383,742 | Threads Today: 122 | Posts Today: 1,492 |
| 03:17 AM | ||
WALKAWAY: Rep. Pete King is the first Republican to sign on to the assault weapons ban | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77730429  Poland08/19/2019 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75500784  United States08/19/2019 03:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73350311 United States08/19/2019 03:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Repukes are hanging on by a nutsack hair already. I guess this means they are tired of the free coke and hookers on the taxpayers' dime. Fuck off treasonous piece of shit. Probably has kiddie diddling in his past so appeasing to DS. |
| jj johns J to the 3rd  User ID: 77893365  Switzerland08/19/2019 03:54 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66619947 United States08/19/2019 03:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "They are weapons of mass slaughter," King said shortly after his backing became public on Congress's website Monday. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77730429 "I don't see any need for them in every day society," King said. The Assault Weapons Ban of 2019 was rolled out in February by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) with 190 other Democrats on board. Another 11 lawmakers signed on after mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, left dozens of people dead and many more injured, with King being among the most recent. King had been the lead sponsor of a bill improving background checks when Republicans controlled the House and was already one of a handful of Republicans backing that bill now. He had been considering doing the assault weapons ban, already, but the shootings in Ohio and Texas raised the level of urgency. "I think the assault weapons ban is timely now, especially in view of the shooting in El Paso and Dayton," King said. King stepping forward could encourage other Republicans to step forward and prod Democrats in districts that have similar partisan makeups to King's district, that leans only slightly Republican. "It might give cover to some other Republicans, it might give some incentive to Democrats," King said of his move. [link to www.nydailynews.com (secure)] Fake News |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77325223  Germany08/19/2019 03:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "They are weapons of mass slaughter," King said shortly after his backing became public on Congress's website Monday. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77730429 "I don't see any need for them in every day society," King said. The Assault Weapons Ban of 2019 was rolled out in February by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) with 190 other Democrats on board. Another 11 lawmakers signed on after mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, left dozens of people dead and many more injured, with King being among the most recent. King had been the lead sponsor of a bill improving background checks when Republicans controlled the House and was already one of a handful of Republicans backing that bill now. He had been considering doing the assault weapons ban, already, but the shootings in Ohio and Texas raised the level of urgency. "I think the assault weapons ban is timely now, especially in view of the shooting in El Paso and Dayton," King said. King stepping forward could encourage other Republicans to step forward and prod Democrats in districts that have similar partisan makeups to King's district, that leans only slightly Republican. "It might give cover to some other Republicans, it might give some incentive to Democrats," King said of his move. [link to www.nydailynews.com (secure)] Fake News How can you use the "fake news" slogan on this? It's what King said, verbatim. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66619947 United States08/19/2019 04:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "They are weapons of mass slaughter," King said shortly after his backing became public on Congress's website Monday. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77730429 "I don't see any need for them in every day society," King said. The Assault Weapons Ban of 2019 was rolled out in February by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) with 190 other Democrats on board. Another 11 lawmakers signed on after mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, left dozens of people dead and many more injured, with King being among the most recent. King had been the lead sponsor of a bill improving background checks when Republicans controlled the House and was already one of a handful of Republicans backing that bill now. He had been considering doing the assault weapons ban, already, but the shootings in Ohio and Texas raised the level of urgency. "I think the assault weapons ban is timely now, especially in view of the shooting in El Paso and Dayton," King said. King stepping forward could encourage other Republicans to step forward and prod Democrats in districts that have similar partisan makeups to King's district, that leans only slightly Republican. "It might give cover to some other Republicans, it might give some incentive to Democrats," King said of his move. [link to www.nydailynews.com (secure)] Fake News How can you use the "fake news" slogan on this? It's what King said, verbatim. Globalist Cult programming made you chop and hack that article to pieces not to mention it is a Globalist Cult rag. Your whole thread is invalid. |
| Captain Tripps User ID: 72693737 United States08/19/2019 04:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "They are weapons of mass slaughter," King said shortly after his backing became public on Congress's website Monday. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77730429 "I don't see any need for them in every day society," King said. The Assault Weapons Ban of 2019 was rolled out in February by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) with 190 other Democrats on board. Another 11 lawmakers signed on after mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, left dozens of people dead and many more injured, with King being among the most recent. King had been the lead sponsor of a bill improving background checks when Republicans controlled the House and was already one of a handful of Republicans backing that bill now. He had been considering doing the assault weapons ban, already, but the shootings in Ohio and Texas raised the level of urgency. "I think the assault weapons ban is timely now, especially in view of the shooting in El Paso and Dayton," King said. King stepping forward could encourage other Republicans to step forward and prod Democrats in districts that have similar partisan makeups to King's district, that leans only slightly Republican. "It might give cover to some other Republicans, it might give some incentive to Democrats," King said of his move. [link to www.nydailynews.com (secure)] COME AND TAKE THEM TRAITORS! I dont believe in anything, I just came for the violence. ........................................talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish- Captain Tripps.....some ppl think fat dont mean greasy...so they gotta learn the hard way- Captain Tripps |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77325223 Germany08/19/2019 04:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "They are weapons of mass slaughter," King said shortly after his backing became public on Congress's website Monday. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77730429 "I don't see any need for them in every day society," King said. The Assault Weapons Ban of 2019 was rolled out in February by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) with 190 other Democrats on board. Another 11 lawmakers signed on after mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, left dozens of people dead and many more injured, with King being among the most recent. King had been the lead sponsor of a bill improving background checks when Republicans controlled the House and was already one of a handful of Republicans backing that bill now. He had been considering doing the assault weapons ban, already, but the shootings in Ohio and Texas raised the level of urgency. "I think the assault weapons ban is timely now, especially in view of the shooting in El Paso and Dayton," King said. King stepping forward could encourage other Republicans to step forward and prod Democrats in districts that have similar partisan makeups to King's district, that leans only slightly Republican. "It might give cover to some other Republicans, it might give some incentive to Democrats," King said of his move. [link to www.nydailynews.com (secure)] Fake News How can you use the "fake news" slogan on this? It's what King said, verbatim. Globalist Cult programming made you chop and hack that article to pieces not to mention it is a Globalist Cult rag. Your whole thread is invalid. But it's a direct, verbatim quote of Rep. King. Sorry if you don't like it, but not liking it doesn't make it "fake news". |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 54497696 United States08/19/2019 04:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astroshill Senior Forum Moderator 08/19/2019 04:10 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.congress.gov (secure)] So basically, the used value of such guns is going to be going through the roof again if this passes. I expect the weak kneed republicans will go along with this like King is. I hope it doesn't pass, but if it does I'll be sure to buy more shit before the law goes into effect. As usual, the cowards in favor of it don't have the balls to go whole hog with confiscation, they stop short as they did in the 90's and just inflate the used market value by cutting off the future supply.  |
| Vicious Deplorable dollop You ain't seen nothing yet! User ID: 77934747 United States08/19/2019 04:10 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "They are weapons of mass slaughter," King said shortly after his backing became public on Congress's website Monday. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77730429 "I don't see any need for them in every day society," King said. The Assault Weapons Ban of 2019 was rolled out in February by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) with 190 other Democrats on board. Another 11 lawmakers signed on after mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, left dozens of people dead and many more injured, with King being among the most recent. King had been the lead sponsor of a bill improving background checks when Republicans controlled the House and was already one of a handful of Republicans backing that bill now. He had been considering doing the assault weapons ban, already, but the shootings in Ohio and Texas raised the level of urgency. "I think the assault weapons ban is timely now, especially in view of the shooting in El Paso and Dayton," King said. King stepping forward could encourage other Republicans to step forward and prod Democrats in districts that have similar partisan makeups to King's district, that leans only slightly Republican. "It might give cover to some other Republicans, it might give some incentive to Democrats," King said of his move. [link to www.nydailynews.com (secure)] What could possibly go wrong?   Kamala Harris is not a Natural Born Citizen. She's illegally running. Used by the Founders... Book I of The Law of Nations, Chapter XIX, § 212 (Joseph Chitty numbering) – “Citizens and natives” reads: 'The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.' 1758 Emerich de Vattel Oh' What the Hell, do I look like I want to die in some nursing home one day... America must have 4 new Constitutional Amendments... 1. Drug Tests and Mental Evaluations on all politicians and judges randomly five times per year. 2. Term Limits for Federal politicians and judges. 3. Mental and health standards for Supreme Court Justices and retirement age set. 4. A 'Star Chamber' of elected Natural Born Citizens (no attorney's) to ivestigate, try, and prosecute the politicians and government employee's as they see fit. Mandatory death penalty by public hanging is the merciful sentence for pedos and their associates. Democrats are a WMD, literally. Let Justice Be Done Though The Heavens Fall. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76315726 United States08/19/2019 04:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Ron W User ID: 75014720 United States08/19/2019 04:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | He doesn't see any need for them? Then why do they EXEMPT THEMSELVES, Government agents all the way down to campus police including All the retirees???!!! And why do they EXEMPT private armed security which the rich and famous use for their protection??? This is evil! They want to take from us what they have and keep for THEMSELVES!! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74950944 United States08/19/2019 04:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73049827 United States08/19/2019 04:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Ninbit User ID: 76723511 United States08/19/2019 04:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NO DEALS! NO GUN CONTROL! Petition To: President Trump and Members of Congress [link to www.chooseliberty.org] Ninbit |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66280474  Czechia08/19/2019 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69365980 United States08/19/2019 05:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NO DEALS! NO GUN CONTROL! Petition To: President Trump and Members of Congress Quoting: Ninbit [link to www.chooseliberty.org] Good luck with that. Thread: Fox News Poll: Nearly half of Americans say Trump has increased the threat of mass shootings. Most back gun restrictions after shootings |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28964405 United States08/19/2019 05:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69766872 United States08/19/2019 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Mental Case User ID: 77935282 United States08/19/2019 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Astroshill Senior Forum Moderator 08/19/2019 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NO DEALS! NO GUN CONTROL! Petition To: President Trump and Members of Congress Quoting: Ninbit [link to www.chooseliberty.org] Good luck with that. Thread: Fox News Poll: Nearly half of Americans say Trump has increased the threat of mass shootings. Most back gun restrictions after shootings If they're so confident that the public is largely in favor of it, why did they stop short of actually confiscating existing semiautomatic rifles and "high capacity" magazines? Why do they grandfather in all existing rifles and magazines? Oh, and while they prohibit the transfer of high capacity magazines and require background checks when selling grandfathered weapons, they don't actually prevent the sale of said weapons. So it will effectively skyrocket the value of existing weapons and create a huge black market for existing high cap mags. I guess they want to enrich existing gun owners and make it more expensive for anyone else to become a legal owner of these guns? Guess they have it out for lower class people looking to defend themselves. If you don't have the disposable income to afford the new inflated prices, you're screwed. Better get them now while you still can, at least the law won't even try to take them away from you once you have them. If this doesn't pass, the only legacy it will leave is generating a nice windfall for gun manufacturers from the rush on these guns like we had under Obama every time he opened his yap on the subject. |
| Astroshill Senior Forum Moderator 08/19/2019 05:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't think the NRA objects to banning criminal background checks or 'banning' military grade assault rifles. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28964405 Semiautomatic rifles are not military grade and are already banned. This law would ban civilian grade semiautomatic rifles, unless you're law enforcement, former law enforcement or already own such a rifle. Don't worry though, while it adds a mandatory background check on private sales it doesn't actually stop the private sale of existing grandfathered guns. If you have one and keep it in good condition it could become quite valuable. |
| 1guynAz User ID: 2229693 United States08/19/2019 05:23 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | First, this is another criminal doing the bidding for the NWO to bring about our disarmament. Second, ban all you want, people will obtain guns to protect themselves as they always have been. Third, the Constitution guarantee's us the right to defend ourselves and protect our families. All that's going to happen is the Supreme Court will make it official once and for all that--- When ANY gun fires one bullet at a time, it's not an assault weapon. So go ahead and play the 'conveniently stupid' game and take it all the way through the courts. In the end, it will be upheld that there is no controversy about it-you have a right to live, be alive and seek happiness which if you ban guns for protection is the opposite of that as in you'd be dead without that protection and very unhappy.  <----very unhappy <----very happy because he has gunsSee the difference????  Living has taught me one thing; nothing is certain...except salvation through Jesus Christ! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76313497 United States08/19/2019 05:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 68560474 United States08/20/2019 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Captain Tripps User ID: 46336788 United States08/25/2019 01:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't think the NRA objects to banning criminal background checks or 'banning' military grade assault rifles. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28964405 Semiautomatic rifles are not military grade and are already banned. This law would ban civilian grade semiautomatic rifles, unless you're law enforcement, former law enforcement or already own such a rifle. Don't worry though, while it adds a mandatory background check on private sales it doesn't actually stop the private sale of existing grandfathered guns. If you have one and keep it in good condition it could become quite valuable. But it's still voluntary as to whether an individual(S) will EVEN GO GET THE BACKGROUND CHECK on a private sale. The only way you could make it mandatory, would be to start a registry on ALL new guns sales. I dont believe in anything, I just came for the violence. ........................................talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish- Captain Tripps.....some ppl think fat dont mean greasy...so they gotta learn the hard way- Captain Tripps |
| Astroshill Senior Forum Moderator 08/25/2019 04:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't think the NRA objects to banning criminal background checks or 'banning' military grade assault rifles. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28964405 Semiautomatic rifles are not military grade and are already banned. This law would ban civilian grade semiautomatic rifles, unless you're law enforcement, former law enforcement or already own such a rifle. Don't worry though, while it adds a mandatory background check on private sales it doesn't actually stop the private sale of existing grandfathered guns. If you have one and keep it in good condition it could become quite valuable. But it's still voluntary as to whether an individual(S) will EVEN GO GET THE BACKGROUND CHECK on a private sale. The only way you could make it mandatory, would be to start a registry on ALL new guns sales. The proposed law would do that, which is why I mentioned that. |
