In Genesis account there's a difference between "create" (barah) and "form" or "model". If we're gonna take into consideration in most cases in Genesis is used form or model or make not as creation ex nihilo but as if taking elements from something already created... we could say the God who did that was different from the hanashash winged-snake dragon. Nowhere says the Bible that snake created or form anything. If humans can clone a sheep that's not creation but taking elements of the egg-cell already existing.


Why would Satan do that? Just to disagree with the Creacionists who believe earth is merely 6000 years old? Certainly that is not what the Bible says but an interpretation based upon texts that could well mean other thing. With the idea of Psalms that 1 day=1000 years we could multiply 1 God's day and the whole "week" of creation reaching almost the same amount of millions of years backed up by evolutionists! After all the events of the Big Bang (in case it is true!) were ticking when the cosmos was not inflated as today as a full baloon. There are simultaneous times depending on who's talking and FROM WHERE. God's point of view AT THAT SINGULARITY reality is different from our point of view TODAY when the cosmos stretched like bubble gum. We could admit 144 days in 6 "days" and AT THE SAME TIME millions of years in our point of view and there wouldn't be contradiction at all. More than that Christians in their ignorance overlook the fact creation started IN THE AFTERNOON and ended in the morning because in Hebrew afternoon means CHAOS (entropy) and morning means something "ordered" (and God saw it was good). The ancient translations even used the word "unified". That is not a modern "interpretation" but was understood by Jews thousands of years ago. Like Maimonides kabbalist, etc.