Seemingly shallow statements that have multiple deeper meanings and/or interpretations

Well looks like the post I linked was removed but you don't really need to see it to get my point.

brain trust

Explain

that's what you guys all are here.

OK thanks for your input.

OK thanks for your input.

glad I could help.

Of course you are.

"I'll be back" - Arnold

.

this is more a paradox than question of layers of meanings and interpretations.

It's a bit like the Liar's Paradox

Not long a go a little girl invented a new paradox


The Pinocchio paradox arises when Pinocchio says "My nose grows now" and is a version of the liar paradox.[1] The liar paradox is defined in philosophy and logic as the statement "This sentence is false." Any attempts to assign a classical binary truth value to this statement lead to a contradiction, or paradox. This occurs because if the statement "This sentence is false" is true, then it is false; this would mean that it is technically true, but also that it is false, and so on without end. Although the Pinocchio paradox belongs to the liar paradox tradition, it is a special case because it has no semantic predicates, as for example "My sentence is false" does


[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Ya I was trying to think of a correct term for it. However, I think a paradox only accounts for a part of what I am talking about. If only #1 on my list existed then I would believe it is a paradox. However, since #2 does exist, it no longer really is a paradox because there is a scenario in which his statement could be true. You just have to dig a little deeper to get to that truth whereas the surface level thought of someone else having the correct prediction being OPs prediction simply could never be true by logical deduction.

thinking about it:

I predict that there will never be true predictions at GLP

is a genuine liar's paradox ...

or is it? I don't know

That is a paradox. However, that is not what I presented. I said that the OP claimed there would be 1 correct prediction.

On surface level, you would think he is speaking of another poster. However, logically, that could never be true because if someone else was correct then OP would be correct so there would be 2 correct predictions.

On closer inspection, OP could be correct only if his post was self-referential. If no one ever made a correct prediction, then OP would be correct because his prediction of only 1 person ever having a correct prediction would be correct!

To me, that goes beyond paradox.

who is to say what the truth is?

and if I disagree with you?

can one tell the truth and lie at the same time?

Just quickly thinking about it... would the statement:

"The truth is a lie"

meet those parameters? Lets think about it more.

it has bigly to do with context, and hyper variable arrangements with the environment mentale / physicale

but if you could isolate pure truth

then again you could argue that it's all truth, and there is no such thing as a lie...

if I told you to go to hell
would you tell I cursed you

Is this the same statement?

1. I predict there will be 1 correct prediction on GLP

or

2. I predict that the only correct prediction is that there will never be a correct prediction on GLP other than this prediction of no other correct predictions ever happening on GLP.

shallow statements of this kind maketh me dizzy

You're still working on if the truth is a lie.

If the truth is found...

To be lies...

I have to go to work soon, but I'll have plenty of time to think about it.

(I've c0nsiderd it before)

To be or not to be... that is the question.

I'm still trying to figure out a way to make the truth is a lie into a true statement.

future tense of course?

bc to ask is to already be?

can one ever actually 'un-be'?