Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory -- Vax Deaths by LOT NUMBER prove there is a HUGE PROBLEM | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76831239 United States 11/02/2021 06:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81022159 United States 11/02/2021 08:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nemo_solus (OP) User ID: 77468770 Denmark 11/02/2021 09:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah. Different companies, using different vaccine technologies, being produced in different labs, that are stored differently, and given to people of different ages in different geographical locations by different people - YET have a common inverse power law Adverse Event/Death profile by lot number. Can't wait to see how they explain this one. Last Edited by nemo_solus on 11/02/2021 09:25 PM |
Pole Cat User ID: 78913409 United States 11/02/2021 09:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nemo_solus (OP) User ID: 77468770 Denmark 11/02/2021 09:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I would regular pin it myself as I think it's that important, but don't have enough points yet. Hopefully enough people will see it and the word will be spread. Last Edited by nemo_solus on 11/02/2021 09:27 PM |
Pole Cat User ID: 78913409 United States 11/02/2021 09:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nemo_solus (OP) User ID: 77468770 Denmark 11/02/2021 09:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78191297 Mexico 11/02/2021 09:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80567039 Brazil 11/02/2021 09:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've said months ago that I believe big pharma is experimenting with the materials in the vacccccccines from batch to batch. They know exactly who's getting what, so get great research data. But until recently WE weren't seeing batch numbers in VAERS data. We are all expendable lab rats. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77680920 United States 11/02/2021 09:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.ocbj.com (secure)] |
Unvaccinated User ID: 77638762 United States 11/02/2021 09:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nemo_solus (OP) User ID: 77468770 Denmark 11/02/2021 09:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80710591 United States 11/02/2021 09:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I wonder if lots are sent to certain locations, such as one lot go to various CVS stores while another goes to the health department. The could lend credence to the theory that some people administering the shots are not properly trained. Like, the health department are probably RNs while CVS or the grocery store are just some pharma tech. They don't aspirate and they just stick it in the arm. If they get a vessel, that person will have issues. |
Dukembg User ID: 65443660 United States 11/02/2021 09:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah. Different companies, using different vaccine technologies, being produced in different labs, that are stored differently, and given to people of different ages in different geographical locations by different people - YET have a common inverse power law Adverse Event/Death profile by lot number. Can't wait to see how they explain this one. this basically confirms what we speculated. Different concoctions for different demographics. which explains why my grandmother at 79 is still rockin and rollin with 2 shots, yet there are thousands of testimonies of injuries and death. Last Edited by Dukembg on 11/02/2021 10:11 PM Prepare yourself for the coming power outage!! Thread: Cyber Attack = American Blackout!!! Power Grid Vulnerable! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72540350 United States 11/02/2021 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Karl over at Market Ticker has really dug into the VAERS data to analyze the following claim: Quoting: nemo_solus There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot number. Quoting: Karl DenningerHe was expecting to debunk it (he has a passionate hatred of tinfoil hats) but instead found that across all three of the vaccine producers they showed a similar abnormal grouping of deaths by lot number. Much less than 50% quoted, this is the TLDR summary: The only thing all three of these vaccines have in common is that all three of them rely on the human body to produce the spike protein that is then attacked by the immune system and produces antibodies; none of them directly introduce the offending substance into the body. The mechanism of induction is different between the J&J and Pfizer/Moderna formulations but all exhibit the same problem. The differential shown in the data is wildly beyond reasonable explanation related to the cohort dosed and the reported person's average age for the full set of events (not just deaths) does not correlate with elevated risk in a given lot either so it is clearly not related to the age of the person jabbed (e.g. "certain lots all went to nursing homes since they were first.") While the highest AE rate lots all have early use dates so do some of the low-AE rate lots so the attempt to explain the data away as "but the highest risk got it first" fails as well. Quoting: Karl DenningerIn other words the best-fit hypothesis is that causing the body to produce part of a pathogen when that part has pathological capacity (as we know is the case for the spike) cannot be controlled adequately through commercial manufacturing process at-scale. This means that no vector-based, irrespective of how (e.g. viral vector or mRNA), not-directly-infused coronavirus jab will ever have an acceptable safety profile because some lots will be "hot" and harm crazy percentages of those they're given to with no way to know in advance. The basic premise used here -- to have the body produce the agent the immune system identifies rather than directly introduce it where you can control the quantity, is a failure. The entire premise of calling something that does this a "vaccine" is bogus and in the context of a coronavirus this may never be able to be done safely. Read the full article here: [link to market-ticker.org (secure)] MRNA Vaxx is garbage science because you cant control how much vaxx will be produced by the host after it is introduced. Some overproduce and some underproduce. Am I getting this right? |
aylarue User ID: 76781814 United States 11/02/2021 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Pole Cat User ID: 78913409 United States 11/02/2021 09:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This would also explain the major problems Baltimore has had with so many vaccinated people dying: [link to www.wbal.com (secure)] It is still happening there too: [link to wtop.com (secure)] The percentage is staggering compared to other cities |
nemo_solus (OP) User ID: 77468770 Denmark 11/02/2021 10:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Karl over at Market Ticker has really dug into the VAERS data to analyze the following claim: Quoting: nemo_solus There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot number. Quoting: Karl DenningerHe was expecting to debunk it (he has a passionate hatred of tinfoil hats) but instead found that across all three of the vaccine producers they showed a similar abnormal grouping of deaths by lot number. Much less than 50% quoted, this is the TLDR summary: The only thing all three of these vaccines have in common is that all three of them rely on the human body to produce the spike protein that is then attacked by the immune system and produces antibodies; none of them directly introduce the offending substance into the body. The mechanism of induction is different between the J&J and Pfizer/Moderna formulations but all exhibit the same problem. The differential shown in the data is wildly beyond reasonable explanation related to the cohort dosed and the reported person's average age for the full set of events (not just deaths) does not correlate with elevated risk in a given lot either so it is clearly not related to the age of the person jabbed (e.g. "certain lots all went to nursing homes since they were first.") While the highest AE rate lots all have early use dates so do some of the low-AE rate lots so the attempt to explain the data away as "but the highest risk got it first" fails as well. Quoting: Karl DenningerIn other words the best-fit hypothesis is that causing the body to produce part of a pathogen when that part has pathological capacity (as we know is the case for the spike) cannot be controlled adequately through commercial manufacturing process at-scale. This means that no vector-based, irrespective of how (e.g. viral vector or mRNA), not-directly-infused coronavirus jab will ever have an acceptable safety profile because some lots will be "hot" and harm crazy percentages of those they're given to with no way to know in advance. The basic premise used here -- to have the body produce the agent the immune system identifies rather than directly introduce it where you can control the quantity, is a failure. The entire premise of calling something that does this a "vaccine" is bogus and in the context of a coronavirus this may never be able to be done safely. Read the full article here: [link to market-ticker.org (secure)] MRNA Vaxx is garbage science because you cant control how much vaxx will be produced by the host after it is introduced. Some overproduce and some underproduce. Am I getting this right? It is unknown at this point exactly what is the root cause of the failure and what exactly this failure does differently in folks to either kill or injure them vs. those that aren't. It's possible that those that don't immediately show injuries or die in proximity to the vaccine have still been harmed. That it is happening across three independent manufacturers and three different implementations is enough to confirm that the drugs are not as well understood as we have been assured they are. The proper thing to do is to immediately halt the administration of these drugs until a thorough investigation has been made and an understanding achieved. This is the reason you need long term tests, not just to study the drug in use but to also perfect the methods and safety of manufacture. Last Edited by nemo_solus on 11/02/2021 10:08 PM |
Wayfaring Stranger User ID: 79139945 Canada 11/02/2021 10:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nemo_solus (OP) User ID: 77468770 Denmark 11/02/2021 10:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I didn't see anything in the analysis to answer that conclusively (if I'm understanding your question). As I understand it, the J&J vaccine is a single dose, but I don't know if that there is a single dose per vial (I would think not, but don't know for certain). Nobody knows exactly how to decode the Lot Number information yet. Last Edited by nemo_solus on 11/02/2021 10:11 PM |
Sungaze_At_Dawn User ID: 81004338 Canada 11/02/2021 10:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81083814 United States 11/02/2021 10:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Karl over at Market Ticker has really dug into the VAERS data to analyze the following claim: Quoting: nemo_solus There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot number. Quoting: Karl DenningerHe was expecting to debunk it (he has a passionate hatred of tinfoil hats) but instead found that across all three of the vaccine producers they showed a similar abnormal grouping of deaths by lot number. Much less than 50% quoted, this is the TLDR summary: The only thing all three of these vaccines have in common is that all three of them rely on the human body to produce the spike protein that is then attacked by the immune system and produces antibodies; none of them directly introduce the offending substance into the body. The mechanism of induction is different between the J&J and Pfizer/Moderna formulations but all exhibit the same problem. The differential shown in the data is wildly beyond reasonable explanation related to the cohort dosed and the reported person's average age for the full set of events (not just deaths) does not correlate with elevated risk in a given lot either so it is clearly not related to the age of the person jabbed (e.g. "certain lots all went to nursing homes since they were first.") While the highest AE rate lots all have early use dates so do some of the low-AE rate lots so the attempt to explain the data away as "but the highest risk got it first" fails as well. Quoting: Karl DenningerIn other words the best-fit hypothesis is that causing the body to produce part of a pathogen when that part has pathological capacity (as we know is the case for the spike) cannot be controlled adequately through commercial manufacturing process at-scale. This means that no vector-based, irrespective of how (e.g. viral vector or mRNA), not-directly-infused coronavirus jab will ever have an acceptable safety profile because some lots will be "hot" and harm crazy percentages of those they're given to with no way to know in advance. The basic premise used here -- to have the body produce the agent the immune system identifies rather than directly introduce it where you can control the quantity, is a failure. The entire premise of calling something that does this a "vaccine" is bogus and in the context of a coronavirus this may never be able to be done safely. Read the full article here: [link to market-ticker.org (secure)] Position of NYC mayor present and future Position of give lt governor NYS will be chained to karmic sentence for eternity past present governors future governors mayor's as well all health officials their positions vaccine mandates all covid related restrictions vaccine passports planned mandates for children will be permanent cursed and condemned NYC will be th most damned city on Earth for those who put me dates in place mandates it's citizens pice firemen all future mandates the positions will become literal living hell for all who serve the ones who released the virus created the vaccines planned this. I will pour the vial containing wrath on the governors seat and mayor's it will permanently affect the positions till the end of the world . Vaccine mandates will cause these individuals to be broken in from the chest and their souls will feel as they are being devoured by fire non stop they will be stun day and night by scorpions bearing the poisons of Judas all their sorrows regrets. The mandates will cause the greatest fear to devour their bellies breaking their back bones. In NYC all who received the mark of the beast by voting for Biden who voted for the wrong person again scorpions will go forth to stung them all with Judas venom city wide |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78824692 United States 11/02/2021 10:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 11m13s [link to www.bitchute.com (secure)] STEW PETERS WITH DR. JANE RUBY - VAERS REVEALS DEATH BY LOT NUMBER First published at 20:37 UTC on November 1st, 2021. backup link: [link to www.brighteon.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78824692 United States 11/02/2021 10:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to medalerts.org (secure)] From the 10/22/2021 release of VAERS data: Found 17,619 cases where Vaccine is COVID19 and Patient Died Table Vaccine/Manufacturer/Lot Count Percent TOTAL † 19,047 † 108.1% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH 4,022 22.83% COVID19 / MODERNA 1,380 7.83% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / UNKNOWN 709 4.02% COVID19 / JANSSEN 426 2.42% COVID19 / JANSSEN / UNKNOWN 306 1.74% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EM0477 229 1.3% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EJ6795 144 0.82% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EJ6788 144 0.82% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EK9788 127 0.72% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EN6201 118 0.67% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EJ6796 115 0.65% UNK / UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER 102 0.58% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EN5318 100 0.57% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EN6200 99 0.56% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EP9598 97 0.55% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EN6198 92 0.52% COVID19 / MODERNA / 039K20A 92 0.52% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EJ6789 91 0.52% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EP2166 90 0.51% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EL9261 86 0.49% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EL3248 86 0.49% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EJ6134 86 0.49% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / EM9810 83 0.47% COVID19 / PFIZER/BIONTECH / ET3620 79 0.45% .......(Many, Many more Lots with Tens of Deaths Reported to VAERS) |
tamaracks User ID: 34769994 United States 11/02/2021 10:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nemo_solus (OP) User ID: 77468770 Denmark 11/02/2021 10:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Karl over at Market Ticker has really dug into the VAERS data to analyze the following claim: Quoting: nemo_solus There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot number. Quoting: Karl DenningerHe was expecting to debunk it (he has a passionate hatred of tinfoil hats) but instead found that across all three of the vaccine producers they showed a similar abnormal grouping of deaths by lot number. Much less than 50% quoted, this is the TLDR summary: The only thing all three of these vaccines have in common is that all three of them rely on the human body to produce the spike protein that is then attacked by the immune system and produces antibodies; none of them directly introduce the offending substance into the body. The mechanism of induction is different between the J&J and Pfizer/Moderna formulations but all exhibit the same problem. The differential shown in the data is wildly beyond reasonable explanation related to the cohort dosed and the reported person's average age for the full set of events (not just deaths) does not correlate with elevated risk in a given lot either so it is clearly not related to the age of the person jabbed (e.g. "certain lots all went to nursing homes since they were first.") While the highest AE rate lots all have early use dates so do some of the low-AE rate lots so the attempt to explain the data away as "but the highest risk got it first" fails as well. Quoting: Karl DenningerIn other words the best-fit hypothesis is that causing the body to produce part of a pathogen when that part has pathological capacity (as we know is the case for the spike) cannot be controlled adequately through commercial manufacturing process at-scale. This means that no vector-based, irrespective of how (e.g. viral vector or mRNA), not-directly-infused coronavirus jab will ever have an acceptable safety profile because some lots will be "hot" and harm crazy percentages of those they're given to with no way to know in advance. The basic premise used here -- to have the body produce the agent the immune system identifies rather than directly introduce it where you can control the quantity, is a failure. The entire premise of calling something that does this a "vaccine" is bogus and in the context of a coronavirus this may never be able to be done safely. Read the full article here: [link to market-ticker.org (secure)] Position of NYC mayor present and future Position of give lt governor NYS will be chained to karmic sentence for eternity past present governors future governors mayor's as well all health officials their positions vaccine mandates all covid related restrictions vaccine passports planned mandates for children will be permanent cursed and condemned NYC will be th most damned city on Earth for those who put me dates in place mandates it's citizens pice firemen all future mandates the positions will become literal living hell for all who serve the ones who released the virus created the vaccines planned this. I will pour the vial containing wrath on the governors seat and mayor's it will permanently affect the positions till the end of the world . Vaccine mandates will cause these individuals to be broken in from the chest and their souls will feel as they are being devoured by fire non stop they will be stun day and night by scorpions bearing the poisons of Judas all their sorrows regrets. The mandates will cause the greatest fear to devour their bellies breaking their back bones. In NYC all who received the mark of the beast by voting for Biden who voted for the wrong person again scorpions will go forth to stung them all with Judas venom city wide I think someone needs to reboot the bot... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78824692 United States 11/02/2021 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thread: Deep Dive into your odds of dying from CoVid VaX / Shot based on your location Deep Dive into your odds of dying from CoVid VaX / Shot based on your location 11/02/2021 01:34 AM 11012021 Odds of Dying from CVShot by State Observations: The Death Rate is Highest in many of the Least Densely Populated States The Same Calculations for Adverse Symptoms could be done, and would probably show a similar higher rate of Illness and Disabilities in direct proportion to Deaths. If the People Running the CoVid Shot(Extermination) program wanted to limit the Public talking about, and Observing Mass Deaths and Injuries from the CoVid Shots, making the Most Deadly / Harmful ones most common in Rural Regions would achieve this goal. 11-01-2021 USA States with the Greatest CoVid Shots Death Rate Odds of dying if you are Fully Vaccinated by StateBy State Odds of dying if you are Fully CoVid Vaccinated (using Population Adjusted for only Fully Vaccinated) (Sources of DATA) [link to medalerts.org (secure)] CoVid Vaccine Deaths 498 for State of California VAERS Data from 10/22/2021 - State Population 2020 Census - Fully Vaccinated Rates for State from DATA FROM 11/01/2021 [link to usafacts.org (secure)] - Example of Calculations used (California) California Pop * Full Vaccination Rate = Population Fully Vaccinated 39,538,223 * 61% (.61) = 24,118,316.03 Population Fully Vaccinated / Deaths = Odds of dying in State if Fully Vaccinated 24,118,316.03 / 498 = 48,430 (Odds of dying if fully Vaccinated in California 1 in 48,430) If fully CoVid Vaccinated- Odds of Dying by State sorted by risk, Adjusted by Population and Full Vax Rates as of 11/01/2021 (1 in #) 5,944 Kentucky 10,860 North Dakota 11,064 Montana 12,056 Minnesota 12,471 Tennessee 12,539 Alaska 13,359 Wyoming 14,685 South Dakota 15,779 New Hampshire 16,714 West Virginia 17,312 Georgia 17,628 Arkansas 19,435 Michigan 20,794 Missouri 21,877 North Carolina 22,054 Wisconsin 24,329 Kansas 24,410 Nebraska 24,585 Indiana 25,163 Iowa 25,681 Hawaii 27,351 New Mexico 27,800 Mississippi 28,449 Maine 28,724 Washington 30,147 Illinois 30,375 Ohio 31,030 Washington D.C. 31,262 Delaware 31,377 Florida 33,249 Alabama 36,577 Pennsylvania 37,598 Oregon 38,082 Colorado 39,223 Louisiana 39,915 Texas 41,508 Vermont 41,652 Arizona 42,590 Idaho 42,872 New Jersey 43,286 Rhode Island 43,372 Maryland 44,736 Massachusetts 44,898 South Carolina 45,315 Virginia 46,549 Connecticut 47,135 Oklahoma 47,325 New York 48,395 Nevada 48,430 California 65,432 Utah |
Grove Street (revived) User ID: 80882194 United States 11/02/2021 10:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | thanks great info.. i know some people who have gotten it and will send this to them to see if they got any of these lot numbers on their 'cards' we all know is vaers is very incomplete and probably only 2% of everything going on. but im glad someone did the research and tallied up the lot numbers .. now at least people can know a little more how bad they won or lost the lottery sad |
nemo_solus (OP) User ID: 77468770 Denmark 11/02/2021 10:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thread: Deep Dive into your odds of dying from CoVid VaX / Shot based on your location Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78824692 Deep Dive into your odds of dying from CoVid VaX / Shot based on your location 11/02/2021 01:34 AM 11012021 Odds of Dying from CVShot by State Check out the great work Steve Kirsch has been doing: Cost benefit by age analysis: The COVID vaccines kill more people than they save for all age groups: [link to www.skirsch.com (secure)] Steve has analyzed the data from multiple independant sources and methodologies and believes that the true (conservative) number of deaths due to the vax is around 150000 people so far. See here: [link to www.skirsch.io (secure)] Last Edited by nemo_solus on 11/02/2021 10:29 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61256629 United States 11/02/2021 10:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thread: Deep Dive into your odds of dying from CoVid VaX / Shot based on your location Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78824692 Deep Dive into your odds of dying from CoVid VaX / Shot based on your location 11/02/2021 01:34 AM 11012021 Odds of Dying from CVShot by State Observations: The Death Rate is Highest in many of the Least Densely Populated States The Same Calculations for Adverse Symptoms could be done, and would probably show a similar higher rate of Illness and Disabilities in direct proportion to Deaths. If the People Running the CoVid Shot(Extermination) program wanted to limit the Public talking about, and Observing Mass Deaths and Injuries from the CoVid Shots, making the Most Deadly / Harmful ones most common in Rural Regions would achieve this goal. 11-01-2021 USA States with the Greatest CoVid Shots Death Rate Odds of dying if you are Fully Vaccinated by StateBy State Odds of dying if you are Fully CoVid Vaccinated (using Population Adjusted for only Fully Vaccinated) (Sources of DATA) [link to medalerts.org (secure)] CoVid Vaccine Deaths 498 for State of California VAERS Data from 10/22/2021 - State Population 2020 Census - Fully Vaccinated Rates for State from DATA FROM 11/01/2021 [link to usafacts.org (secure)] - Example of Calculations used (California) California Pop * Full Vaccination Rate = Population Fully Vaccinated 39,538,223 * 61% (.61) = 24,118,316.03 Population Fully Vaccinated / Deaths = Odds of dying in State if Fully Vaccinated 24,118,316.03 / 498 = 48,430 (Odds of dying if fully Vaccinated in California 1 in 48,430) If fully CoVid Vaccinated- Odds of Dying by State sorted by risk, Adjusted by Population and Full Vax Rates as of 11/01/2021 (1 in #) 5,944 Kentucky 10,860 North Dakota 11,064 Montana 12,056 Minnesota 12,471 Tennessee 12,539 Alaska 13,359 Wyoming 14,685 South Dakota 15,779 New Hampshire 16,714 West Virginia 17,312 Georgia 17,628 Arkansas 19,435 Michigan 20,794 Missouri 21,877 North Carolina 22,054 Wisconsin 24,329 Kansas 24,410 Nebraska 24,585 Indiana 25,163 Iowa 25,681 Hawaii 27,351 New Mexico 27,800 Mississippi 28,449 Maine 28,724 Washington 30,147 Illinois 30,375 Ohio 31,030 Washington D.C. 31,262 Delaware 31,377 Florida 33,249 Alabama 36,577 Pennsylvania 37,598 Oregon 38,082 Colorado 39,223 Louisiana 39,915 Texas 41,508 Vermont 41,652 Arizona 42,590 Idaho 42,872 New Jersey 43,286 Rhode Island 43,372 Maryland 44,736 Massachusetts 44,898 South Carolina 45,315 Virginia 46,549 Connecticut 47,135 Oklahoma 47,325 New York 48,395 Nevada 48,430 California 65,432 Utah I told you Trump volunteered us for a nationwide clinical trial months ago complete with control groups which is why the military was only given one choice Thread: Is this true? Blacks aren't getting same jab as whites? (Page 13) |