|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: WE’VE HAD 21,000+ CASES OF VAXX-INDUCED MYOCARDITIS THAT THE CDC HAS VERIFIED
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...
What a joke you write.
Myocarditis is an extremely injurious condition and often fatal over 5 year timeframe.
And all you have to do is examine every Vaers system yourself which are largely entered by doctors and nurses.
All you have to do is notice the quick media campaigns that are now teaching that the heart problems are normal in young people.
Or how about seeing that there were more recoded deaths in the Pfizer 6 month trial data in jabbed group then the non jabbed group and ask yourself why both Pfizer and Moderna unblinded their trial groups which was supposed to be giving regulators health safety data until 2023 ?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81774334 well if what you are saying is true, the data should be there. I mean real clinical data, not just VAERS data (which is not vetted, and has been over run with exaggerated or false reports). Science requires real data, not hear-say. There is a lot of hear-say in recent years... what's the issue with providing real, verifiable data? What's wrong with questioning who is falling ill with any of the maladies mentioned. my anecdotal experience is that based on the media they are consuming, the greater their side-effects. Some of them seem to feign their over all health condition or exacerbate it for sympathy. From what I can ascertain from speaking with my own doctor, and my kids doctors, if the data showed that vaccines (any vaccine, not just for covid) had verified, linked repercussions, it would be scaled back, or discontinued. This is coming from folks that have been in the field for 40+ years, and a few newer doctors (less than 10 years). The old timers can even rattle off a few vaccines that were pulled over the years. In GOD we trust, but the rest better BRING DATA. AC wrote: "well if what you are saying is true, the data should be there. I mean real clinical data, not just VAERS data (which is not vetted, and has been over run with exaggerated or false reports)."Overrun? do you have any proof of that statement? I doubt it, and I doubt you are aware that the VAERS database is POLICED by the CDC itself. AC wrote: "Some of them seem to feign their over all health condition or exacerbate it for sympathy."Do you have any proof of such fakery, or do you consider what "seems" to you to be scientific evidence? AC wrote: From what I can ascertain from speaking with my own doctor, and my kids doctors, if the data showed that vaccines (any vaccine, not just for covid) had verified, linked repercussions, it would be scaled back, or discontinued.in the past, any jab that was pulled was due to analysis of VAERS data exclusively. Ok, back to sleep now AC. Sorry to disturb your slumber. for the guy who was not aware that at least one of the vaccines is now FDA approved [ link to www.fda.gov (secure)] Previous to this, vaccines were not nearly as politicized, or would you disagree? There have always been "anti-vaxxers" especially here on GLP. Sadly VAERS data is not policed to the extent you and I wish it was. They even tell you straight away that its a "passive reporting system, meaning it relies on individuals to send in reports of their experiences." [ link to vaers.hhs.gov (secure)] Can you think of someone maybe exacerbating, or down right falsifying a report, to push a narrative? That seems to be the running mantra here, that the "other side" is falsifying information, what makes you think its not a 2 way street? The evidence I could provide is (as stated in the previous post) anecdotal. The things that my family and friends have said happened to them cleared up soon as the news cycles changed, interestingly enough. Now I am not saying NO ONE was ever harmed by a vaccine, obviously that is not true, there will always be outliers. I am just saying that maybe with this particular vaccine, we let our own political bias and lack of empirical scientific data cloud our judgment. Mix that with a fair amount of propaganda and an effective disinformation campaign and you have plenty fooled. Another thing for those interested in the recent emergence of cases of myocarditis, toggle your search settings to limit results prior to Jan 1st 2020. You can read reports of myocarditis and its prevalence in late teens, early 20s males. Why? Take of the blinders folks. You are being led by the nose whether you realize it or not. The injections administered in the USA are not an approved VACCINE.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
