YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50487851 United Kingdom 11/01/2022 04:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Happy in Nature (OP) User ID: 81071993 Nicaragua 11/01/2022 04:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I emailed every single US Senator and representative (individually, not en mass), the CDC, NIH, NY Times, CNN, FOX, MSNC, and Robert Kennedy the MSDS for SM-102, the 2nd Moderna vaxx ingredient. I sent the info to Bernie Sanders and Occasional Kotex a dozen times. They cannot say they didn't know that the second ingredient clearly states not for human or animal use on the MSDS. They deliberately chose to ignore the warning. |
XJDUB User ID: 75816770 Canada 11/01/2022 05:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84616736 United States 11/01/2022 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I emailed every single US Senator and representative (individually, not en mass), the CDC, NIH, NY Times, CNN, FOX, MSNC, and Robert Kennedy the MSDS for SM-102, the 2nd Moderna vaxx ingredient. I sent the info to Bernie Sanders and Occasional Kotex a dozen times. They cannot say they didn't know that the second ingredient clearly states not for human or animal use on the MSDS. They deliberately chose to ignore the warning. Your awesome. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73987782 United States 11/01/2022 05:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84445193 Germany 11/01/2022 06:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77962052 United States 11/01/2022 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83522628 Denmark 11/01/2022 07:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82846315 United States 11/01/2022 07:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82846315 United States 11/01/2022 07:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83907461 Finland 11/01/2022 07:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Mexican Thinker. User ID: 84600661 Mexico 11/02/2022 01:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Companies owned by the Israeli bankstards carry a set of rules that further the goals of Agenda 2030, globalization, depopulation, ghey depravation and the taking down of the world economy and the like. These companies are owned by the bankstards through their companies, Black Rock, Vanguard and State Street, who nobody can tell who their owners are.... Then they have a second tier and even a third, fourth and fifth tier of companies that finally are owned by the three major companies exposed above. They have been pushing the vaccines among their employees, forcing them to take the vaccines to continue being employed, and have pushed for totalitarian rules like Paypal taking people´s money through heavy censoring to start tightening the rules on people for the New World Order to take control of slaves and even behead people for reasons beyond any reasoning which we will see after 2024-25... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84195312 United States 11/02/2022 01:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I emailed every single US Senator and representative (individually, not en mass), the CDC, NIH, NY Times, CNN, FOX, MSNC, and Robert Kennedy the MSDS for SM-102, the 2nd Moderna vaxx ingredient. I sent the info to Bernie Sanders and Occasional Kotex a dozen times. They cannot say they didn't know that the second ingredient clearly states not for human or animal use on the MSDS. They deliberately chose to ignore the warning. Because they get hundreds of ranting wingnuts like you mailing them every day and they know how to spot them. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82846315 United States 11/02/2022 01:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80122451 United Kingdom 11/02/2022 01:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fake pseudoscience claim: The Moderna vaccine contains SM-102 which could cause health complaints such as cancer, fertility damage and damage to the nervous system, kidneys or respiratory system. Fact: These claims about SM-102 are from a product safety leaflet when it is in a mixed solution with a toxic substance called chloroform. The Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, but not chloroform. A Facebook user has posted a video which suggests that the Moderna vaccine is dangerous to human health because one of its ingredients appears to be described as hazardous and toxic in a safety data sheet. But this warning applies to the ingredient (a lipid called SM-102) when it is in a mixture with chloroform, a known highly toxic substance. The video shows someone Google “simple ingredients for the moderna vaccine”. They then scroll through the results, and find that an ingredient “SM-102” is first in a bullet point list. Searching for SM-102 leads to a chemical supplier’s website. The user downloads the safety data sheet provided and highlights a number of hazards associated with the substance. These include warnings that it is “highly flammable”, “suspected of causing cancer”, “suspected of damaging fertility” and causes “damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver, the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure” amongst others. Although the Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, and the Facebook video does follow a link to a genuine safety data sheet, the safety information refers to SM-102 in a mixture with chloroform, which is known to be a toxic substance. The third page of the leaflet shown in the video, explains the product listing, stating that chloroform (which makes up 90% of this particular mixture) is a “dangerous” component. The SM-102 makes up 10% of the mixture described in the leaflet. [link to fullfact.org (secure)] And OP wonders why nobody will listen to them. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80037713 Sweden 11/02/2022 01:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83625806 Poland 11/02/2022 02:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77949466 United States 11/02/2022 03:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This one again? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80122451 Fake pseudoscience claim: The Moderna vaccine contains SM-102 which could cause health complaints such as cancer, fertility damage and damage to the nervous system, kidneys or respiratory system. Fact: These claims about SM-102 are from a product safety leaflet when it is in a mixed solution with a toxic substance called chloroform. The Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, but not chloroform. A Facebook user has posted a video which suggests that the Moderna vaccine is dangerous to human health because one of its ingredients appears to be described as hazardous and toxic in a safety data sheet. But this warning applies to the ingredient (a lipid called SM-102) when it is in a mixture with chloroform, a known highly toxic substance. The video shows someone Google “simple ingredients for the moderna vaccine”. They then scroll through the results, and find that an ingredient “SM-102” is first in a bullet point list. Searching for SM-102 leads to a chemical supplier’s website. The user downloads the safety data sheet provided and highlights a number of hazards associated with the substance. These include warnings that it is “highly flammable”, “suspected of causing cancer”, “suspected of damaging fertility” and causes “damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver, the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure” amongst others. Although the Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, and the Facebook video does follow a link to a genuine safety data sheet, the safety information refers to SM-102 in a mixture with chloroform, which is known to be a toxic substance. The third page of the leaflet shown in the video, explains the product listing, stating that chloroform (which makes up 90% of this particular mixture) is a “dangerous” component. The SM-102 makes up 10% of the mixture described in the leaflet. [link to fullfact.org (secure)] And OP wonders why nobody will listen to them. Did you actually read the MSDS? Or did you just take their word for it? Do you have experience with this at work? It clearly says SM-102 is specifically what it is addressing. If it was a mixture it would say the name of the product or mixture at the top not specifically SM-102. It’s not talking about a 90/10 mixture at all. It shows the dangers of mixing it. That doesn’t mean shit. Politifact is partisan bullshit and that should be your first clue |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77949466 United States 11/02/2022 03:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78067678 United States 11/02/2022 03:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This one again? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80122451 Fake pseudoscience claim: The Moderna vaccine contains SM-102 which could cause health complaints such as cancer, fertility damage and damage to the nervous system, kidneys or respiratory system. Fact: These claims about SM-102 are from a product safety leaflet when it is in a mixed solution with a toxic substance called chloroform. The Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, but not chloroform. A Facebook user has posted a video which suggests that the Moderna vaccine is dangerous to human health because one of its ingredients appears to be described as hazardous and toxic in a safety data sheet. But this warning applies to the ingredient (a lipid called SM-102) when it is in a mixture with chloroform, a known highly toxic substance. The video shows someone Google “simple ingredients for the moderna vaccine”. They then scroll through the results, and find that an ingredient “SM-102” is first in a bullet point list. Searching for SM-102 leads to a chemical supplier’s website. The user downloads the safety data sheet provided and highlights a number of hazards associated with the substance. These include warnings that it is “highly flammable”, “suspected of causing cancer”, “suspected of damaging fertility” and causes “damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver, the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure” amongst others. Although the Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, and the Facebook video does follow a link to a genuine safety data sheet, the safety information refers to SM-102 in a mixture with chloroform, which is known to be a toxic substance. The third page of the leaflet shown in the video, explains the product listing, stating that chloroform (which makes up 90% of this particular mixture) is a “dangerous” component. The SM-102 makes up 10% of the mixture described in the leaflet. [link to fullfact.org (secure)] And OP wonders why nobody will listen to them. Did you actually read the MSDS? Or did you just take their word for it? Do you have experience with this at work? It clearly says SM-102 is specifically what it is addressing. If it was a mixture it would say the name of the product or mixture at the top not specifically SM-102. It’s not talking about a 90/10 mixture at all. It shows the dangers of mixing it. That doesn’t mean shit. Politifact is partisan bullshit and that should be your first clue Yes, it’s right here. [link to cdn.caymanchem.com (secure)] And there’s no chloroform in it. Besides, this is not the stock that was used in formulating the vaccines anyway. It’s the lipid SM-102, but it’s a product that’s not for human use, as it says right in the SDS. Now think about this for a minute - it’s easy to analyze a liquid down to the parts per billion level of chloroform. If there was actually any chloroform in the vaccines, which there isn’t, don’t you think someone would have done that analysis to prove it? This is just such utter nonsense. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78067678 United States 11/02/2022 03:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Happy in Nature (OP) User ID: 81071993 Nicaragua 11/02/2022 08:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I emailed every single US Senator and representative (individually, not en mass), the CDC, NIH, NY Times, CNN, FOX, MSNC, and Robert Kennedy the MSDS for SM-102, the 2nd Moderna vaxx ingredient. I sent the info to Bernie Sanders and Occasional Kotex a dozen times. They cannot say they didn't know that the second ingredient clearly states not for human or animal use on the MSDS. They deliberately chose to ignore the warning. Because they get hundreds of ranting wingnuts like you mailing them every day and they know how to spot them. Fuck off, Langley. |
Happy in Nature (OP) User ID: 81071993 Nicaragua 11/02/2022 08:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So you are saying SM-102 is safe to drink? I guess you think that you shouldn’t call POISON CONTROL when you ingest it because it’s yummy. I’m sure it’s safe to inject into your arm Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77949466 Sure, it’s just a lipid and wouldn’t harm you in the least. But the 90% chloroform carrier will poison the body. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83746061 United States 11/02/2022 08:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I emailed every single US Senator and representative (individually, not en mass), the CDC, NIH, NY Times, CNN, FOX, MSNC, and Robert Kennedy the MSDS for SM-102, the 2nd Moderna vaxx ingredient. I sent the info to Bernie Sanders and Occasional Kotex a dozen times. They cannot say they didn't know that the second ingredient clearly states not for human or animal use on the MSDS. They deliberately chose to ignore the warning. All of them are part of the system, OP. Even Robert Kennedy is controlled opposition. We are in the end times. Trust no one but the Lord! |
Happy in Nature (OP) User ID: 81071993 Nicaragua 11/02/2022 08:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This one again? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80122451 Fake pseudoscience claim: The Moderna vaccine contains SM-102 which could cause health complaints such as cancer, fertility damage and damage to the nervous system, kidneys or respiratory system. Fact: These claims about SM-102 are from a product safety leaflet when it is in a mixed solution with a toxic substance called chloroform. The Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, but not chloroform. A Facebook user has posted a video which suggests that the Moderna vaccine is dangerous to human health because one of its ingredients appears to be described as hazardous and toxic in a safety data sheet. But this warning applies to the ingredient (a lipid called SM-102) when it is in a mixture with chloroform, a known highly toxic substance. The video shows someone Google “simple ingredients for the moderna vaccine”. They then scroll through the results, and find that an ingredient “SM-102” is first in a bullet point list. Searching for SM-102 leads to a chemical supplier’s website. The user downloads the safety data sheet provided and highlights a number of hazards associated with the substance. These include warnings that it is “highly flammable”, “suspected of causing cancer”, “suspected of damaging fertility” and causes “damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver, the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure” amongst others. Although the Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, and the Facebook video does follow a link to a genuine safety data sheet, the safety information refers to SM-102 in a mixture with chloroform, which is known to be a toxic substance. The third page of the leaflet shown in the video, explains the product listing, stating that chloroform (which makes up 90% of this particular mixture) is a “dangerous” component. The SM-102 makes up 10% of the mixture described in the leaflet. [link to fullfact.org (secure)] And OP wonders why nobody will listen to them. Did you actually read the MSDS? Or did you just take their word for it? Do you have experience with this at work? It clearly says SM-102 is specifically what it is addressing. If it was a mixture it would say the name of the product or mixture at the top not specifically SM-102. It’s not talking about a 90/10 mixture at all. It shows the dangers of mixing it. That doesn’t mean shit. Politifact is partisan bullshit and that should be your first clue Yes, it’s right here. [link to cdn.caymanchem.com (secure)] And there’s no chloroform in it. Besides, this is not the stock that was used in formulating the vaccines anyway. It’s the lipid SM-102, but it’s a product that’s not for human use, as it says right in the SDS. Now think about this for a minute - it’s easy to analyze a liquid down to the parts per billion level of chloroform. If there was actually any chloroform in the vaccines, which there isn’t, don’t you think someone would have done that analysis to prove it? This is just such utter nonsense. I read the MSDS and wrote to Cayman Chemicals. They changed their MSDS info three days after receipt of my email. The lipid needs a carrier. SM102 uses a chloroform. The patent for SM02 includes the chloroform carrier. SM102 is sold with 90% chloroform as a carrier. |
Happy in Nature (OP) User ID: 81071993 Nicaragua 11/02/2022 09:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This one again? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80122451 Fake pseudoscience claim: The Moderna vaccine contains SM-102 which could cause health complaints such as cancer, fertility damage and damage to the nervous system, kidneys or respiratory system. Fact: These claims about SM-102 are from a product safety leaflet when it is in a mixed solution with a toxic substance called chloroform. The Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, but not chloroform. A Facebook user has posted a video which suggests that the Moderna vaccine is dangerous to human health because one of its ingredients appears to be described as hazardous and toxic in a safety data sheet. But this warning applies to the ingredient (a lipid called SM-102) when it is in a mixture with chloroform, a known highly toxic substance. The video shows someone Google “simple ingredients for the moderna vaccine”. They then scroll through the results, and find that an ingredient “SM-102” is first in a bullet point list. Searching for SM-102 leads to a chemical supplier’s website. The user downloads the safety data sheet provided and highlights a number of hazards associated with the substance. These include warnings that it is “highly flammable”, “suspected of causing cancer”, “suspected of damaging fertility” and causes “damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver, the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure” amongst others. Although the Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, and the Facebook video does follow a link to a genuine safety data sheet, the safety information refers to SM-102 in a mixture with chloroform, which is known to be a toxic substance. The third page of the leaflet shown in the video, explains the product listing, stating that chloroform (which makes up 90% of this particular mixture) is a “dangerous” component. The SM-102 makes up 10% of the mixture described in the leaflet. [link to fullfact.org (secure)] And OP wonders why nobody will listen to them. All that and you failed to acknowledge the MSDS and the patent. I never watched the video you referenced, so that us not where I got the info. |
Happy in Nature (OP) User ID: 81071993 Nicaragua 11/02/2022 09:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thread: Chloroform, SM-102 and Death in 180 Days: Important Update, page 9 I shared this in the SM-102 thread, but I am making a separate post and green pinning to start because I feel this is relevant and important. I am not a biochemist, but everything he states makes perfect sense. SM-102 is the third listed ingredient. It is more than minute concentrations. This is how the vaccine will kill people, but it will be blamed on the cytokine storm. Maybe it is a combination of both. This is serious. Hoping some biochemists and those in the know will chime in. From the article: Connecticut Publishes Moderna COVID Vax Ingredients: DEADLY POISON “SM-102 – Not for Human or Veterinary Use” (Less than 50%) "I am getting a lot of bullshit emails from biochemists telling me that the evil data about SM-102 has to do with the fact that it is delivered via a solution of Chloroform and the hazards listed on the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) deal with Chloroform. No, they don’t. The MSDS deals with the substance SM-102 as it is manufactured by Cayman Chemical Company. Period. The ingredients list in the Moderna COVID ‘Vaccine” lists SM-102 as the third most-prevalent ingredient in the vaccine, and that ingredient is as the Cayman Chemical Company describes it. It’s that simple. But this actually gets worse. Chloroform is the solution used with the SM-102 and Chloroform has been outlawed for use by consumers for decades. The reason Chloroform is outlawed for use by consumers has to do with how long it stays in a human body and what it does to a human body while it’s inside. The Half-Life of Chloroform is 180 days. That means that it takes half a YEAR for only HALF of the chloroform, to be exited out of the body. You with me so far? Chloroform, like any other chemical, breaks down. And when it comes into contact with oxygen, it breaks down into . . . . wait for it . . . . Phosgene Gas. Phosgene gas is fatal to humans in concentrations as low as seven parts per million (7ppm). So all these folks getting the “jab” are getting an arm full of Chloroform which, as it circulates through their bodies will break down into phosgene gas. Depending upon the unique functions of various people, some — maybe many — of those people MIGHT reach the fatal threshold of phosgene gas in their system, and die from it; likely within 180 days after the second “jab.” But wait, there’s even MORE! Phosgene is a highly toxic substance that exists as a gas at room temperature. Owing to its poor water solubility, one of the hallmarks of phosgene toxicity is an unpredictable asymptomatic latent phase before the development of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Yes, the lungs fill with fluid and the patient can’t breathe. Just like . . . . wait for it . . . . “COVID. As these people start dropping like flies, the very same people who brought us the vaccine can simply blame it on a COVID variant. Gee, too bad they died from a COVID variant that the vaccine couldn’t protect them from." Less than 50% [link to infiniteunknown.net (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79740883 United States 11/02/2022 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thread: Chloroform, SM-102 and Death in 180 Days: Important Update, page 9 Quoting: Happy in Nature I shared this in the SM-102 thread, but I am making a separate post and green pinning to start because I feel this is relevant and important. I am not a biochemist, but everything he states makes perfect sense. SM-102 is the third listed ingredient. It is more than minute concentrations. This is how the vaccine will kill people, but it will be blamed on the cytokine storm. Maybe it is a combination of both. This is serious. Hoping some biochemists and those in the know will chime in. From the article: Connecticut Publishes Moderna COVID Vax Ingredients: DEADLY POISON “SM-102 – Not for Human or Veterinary Use” (Less than 50%) "I am getting a lot of bullshit emails from biochemists telling me that the evil data about SM-102 has to do with the fact that it is delivered via a solution of Chloroform and the hazards listed on the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) deal with Chloroform. No, they don’t. The MSDS deals with the substance SM-102 as it is manufactured by Cayman Chemical Company. Period. The ingredients list in the Moderna COVID ‘Vaccine” lists SM-102 as the third most-prevalent ingredient in the vaccine, and that ingredient is as the Cayman Chemical Company describes it. It’s that simple. But this actually gets worse. Chloroform is the solution used with the SM-102 and Chloroform has been outlawed for use by consumers for decades. The reason Chloroform is outlawed for use by consumers has to do with how long it stays in a human body and what it does to a human body while it’s inside. The Half-Life of Chloroform is 180 days. That means that it takes half a YEAR for only HALF of the chloroform, to be exited out of the body. You with me so far? Chloroform, like any other chemical, breaks down. And when it comes into contact with oxygen, it breaks down into . . . . wait for it . . . . Phosgene Gas. Phosgene gas is fatal to humans in concentrations as low as seven parts per million (7ppm). So all these folks getting the “jab” are getting an arm full of Chloroform which, as it circulates through their bodies will break down into phosgene gas. Depending upon the unique functions of various people, some — maybe many — of those people MIGHT reach the fatal threshold of phosgene gas in their system, and die from it; likely within 180 days after the second “jab.” But wait, there’s even MORE! Phosgene is a highly toxic substance that exists as a gas at room temperature. Owing to its poor water solubility, one of the hallmarks of phosgene toxicity is an unpredictable asymptomatic latent phase before the development of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Yes, the lungs fill with fluid and the patient can’t breathe. Just like . . . . wait for it . . . . “COVID. As these people start dropping like flies, the very same people who brought us the vaccine can simply blame it on a COVID variant. Gee, too bad they died from a COVID variant that the vaccine couldn’t protect them from." Less than 50% [link to infiniteunknown.net (secure)] But it’s still bullshit about your chloroform claim. See above. I don’t care what infiniteunknown.net says. |
Garufal User ID: 79964821 United States 11/02/2022 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Or how about post the good stuff on Rumble? Control freaks HATE competition. A epiphany I had watering my lawn one day. "Karma is the universal judicial system that NOBODY is Immune from" -Me I LOVE good juicy gossip. Lay it on me. |
Happy in Nature (OP) User ID: 81071993 Nicaragua 11/02/2022 10:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thread: Chloroform, SM-102 and Death in 180 Days: Important Update, page 9 Quoting: Happy in Nature I shared this in the SM-102 thread, but I am making a separate post and green pinning to start because I feel this is relevant and important. I am not a biochemist, but everything he states makes perfect sense. SM-102 is the third listed ingredient. It is more than minute concentrations. This is how the vaccine will kill people, but it will be blamed on the cytokine storm. Maybe it is a combination of both. This is serious. Hoping some biochemists and those in the know will chime in. From the article: Connecticut Publishes Moderna COVID Vax Ingredients: DEADLY POISON “SM-102 – Not for Human or Veterinary Use” (Less than 50%) "I am getting a lot of bullshit emails from biochemists telling me that the evil data about SM-102 has to do with the fact that it is delivered via a solution of Chloroform and the hazards listed on the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) deal with Chloroform. No, they don’t. The MSDS deals with the substance SM-102 as it is manufactured by Cayman Chemical Company. Period. The ingredients list in the Moderna COVID ‘Vaccine” lists SM-102 as the third most-prevalent ingredient in the vaccine, and that ingredient is as the Cayman Chemical Company describes it. It’s that simple. But this actually gets worse. Chloroform is the solution used with the SM-102 and Chloroform has been outlawed for use by consumers for decades. The reason Chloroform is outlawed for use by consumers has to do with how long it stays in a human body and what it does to a human body while it’s inside. The Half-Life of Chloroform is 180 days. That means that it takes half a YEAR for only HALF of the chloroform, to be exited out of the body. You with me so far? Chloroform, like any other chemical, breaks down. And when it comes into contact with oxygen, it breaks down into . . . . wait for it . . . . Phosgene Gas. Phosgene gas is fatal to humans in concentrations as low as seven parts per million (7ppm). So all these folks getting the “jab” are getting an arm full of Chloroform which, as it circulates through their bodies will break down into phosgene gas. Depending upon the unique functions of various people, some — maybe many — of those people MIGHT reach the fatal threshold of phosgene gas in their system, and die from it; likely within 180 days after the second “jab.” But wait, there’s even MORE! Phosgene is a highly toxic substance that exists as a gas at room temperature. Owing to its poor water solubility, one of the hallmarks of phosgene toxicity is an unpredictable asymptomatic latent phase before the development of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Yes, the lungs fill with fluid and the patient can’t breathe. Just like . . . . wait for it . . . . “COVID. As these people start dropping like flies, the very same people who brought us the vaccine can simply blame it on a COVID variant. Gee, too bad they died from a COVID variant that the vaccine couldn’t protect them from." Less than 50% [link to infiniteunknown.net (secure)] But it’s still bullshit about your chloroform claim. See above. I don’t care what infiniteunknown.net says. It is listed in the MSDS and the patent, shill. |