Evolution vs creation ID question

Hindus are just eastern Catholics. They have the same beliefs, the objects and icons have just been renamed, as with Islam. It is all Mythraism. Christianity on the other hand is something completely different.



You care to explain , Hindus have millions of demigods where does this tie in to the catholic faith ?


It was new to me too. That video series details the similarities. I didn't take very good notes, but it was striking. Obviously Hindu predates Catholicism. It all connects to Babylon and Mythraism.

catholics venerate saints
which would correlate with the many gods of hinduism
the New Testament does not support this view



Thats different, hindus venerate saints, demigods are different, demigods are like a heavenly government each one has a particular role within the material creation, and are worshipped accordingly.

Did you or the Pope even read Genesis ? GOD commanded the land to produce plants.It does Not say anywhere GOD created ants himself.The land did so it is possible some sort of evolution occured .None of that dinosaur become a chicken "theory"Because evolution is not a science its just a theory.

christianity is nothing
because it means nothing
people of many contradicting beliefs call themselves "christians"


Yes they do, but if they have other gods then they are not christian. The first commandment of God is to have no other gods.

"Christianity is nothing" is like saying science and history are nothing. One day you will be a nothing.

christianity is nothing
because it means nothing
people of many contradicting beliefs call themselves "christians"


Yes they do, but if they have other gods then they are not christian. The first commandment of God is to have no other gods.

"Christianity is nothing" is like saying science and history are nothing. One day you will be a nothing.

I was just wondering how the creationist justify there views when they contradict the highest earthly christian authority, as well as all logical reasoning.



The pope certainly isn't considered to be "the highest earthly christian authority" to a bible believer.

I'd call him the most visible bible perverter.

Don't mean to sound so harsh, but that is the truth.

Why was America formed? It was formed by bible believers who wanted to get away from all that.

That is why America to this day has the largest concentration of bible literalists in the world.

I am none of those religions and I think both evolution and creation have points to them.... I do not even see them as opposing, but more tunnel vision. either or is just more polarity....

I am none of those religions and I think both evolution and creation have points to them.... I do not even see them as opposing, but more tunnel vision. either or is just more polarity....

that's why you make sense
you don't feel the need to be "right"

Simple, the universe was CREATED to EVOLVE.

more like uninquisitive. creation (6000 year old earth) and evolution are completley at odds.

more like uninquisitive. creation (6000 year old earth) and evolution are completley at odds.


Where do they get that the earth is only 6,000 years old?


I know they figure 1,000 years is ONE day in God's time, but even then, he finished creating the earth on the 6th day (year 6,000)...


and we all know 1,000's of more years have passed since then.

Consider that Jesus was born 2,000 or so years ago...

I am none of those religions and I think both evolution and creation have points to them.... I do not even see them as opposing, but more tunnel vision. either or is just more polarity....

that's why you make sense
you don't feel the need to be "right"

more like uninquisitive. creation (6000 year old earth) and evolution are completley at odds. To think both could be right is cognitive discinence in the extreme. To belive both could partly right is silly too. Why would god create a universe capable of evolution, capable of sponanteously creating its own life and then go "oh fuck it , I will just magic stuff into existance"

more like uninquisitive. creation (6000 year old earth) and evolution are completley at odds.


Where do they get that the earth is only 6,000 years old?


I know they figure 1,000 years is ONE day in God's time, but even then, he finished creating the earth on the 6th day (year 6,000)...


and we all know 1,000's of more years have passed since then.

Consider that Jesus was born 2,000 or so years ago...


The thousand year for a day principle is applied to prophetic time, creation is the account of given history. The 6000 years is added from the generations given.

evolution theory was funded by the banksters who bought up all the media back in the 1930s when for pennies on the dollar when the stock market crashed.

nothing gets heard on a wide scale without the approval of the men and their money machiens to back it all....

the media is controlled. part of that control is the lie of evolution theory brainwashing the masses from 1920s on....

you people are falling for the biggest lie of all history,evolution theory is bunk science, nnot even science byut a hypothesis, not even a theory....

anyone can do a googel "creation science" and find oodles of strong scientific date backing creation.

one sees only what one wants to

the singularity split to become the two and the two begot the third and from the third all things were possible. i am not making that up, it came from some text. can anyone tell me where i got that from? not a trick question, i really don,t remember. the singularity is of course the divine conscience or god. {or the fractal of all fractals}

more like uninquisitive. creation (6000 year old earth) and evolution are completley at odds.


Where do they get that the earth is only 6,000 years old?


I know they figure 1,000 years is ONE day in God's time, but even then, he finished creating the earth on the 6th day (year 6,000)...


and we all know 1,000's of more years have passed since then.

Consider that Jesus was born 2,000 or so years ago...


The thousand year for a day principle is applied to prophetic time, creation is the account of given history. The 6000 years is added from the generations given.

that only measures the time from
Adam's creation
not from the very beginning

more like uninquisitive. creation (6000 year old earth) and evolution are completley at odds.


Where do they get that the earth is only 6,000 years old?


I know they figure 1,000 years is ONE day in God's time, but even then, he finished creating the earth on the 6th day (year 6,000)...


and we all know 1,000's of more years have passed since then.

Consider that Jesus was born 2,000 or so years ago...


The thousand year for a day principle is applied to prophetic time, creation is the account of given history. The 6000 years is added from the generations given.

that only measures the time from
Adam's creation
not from the very beginning


It was the very beginning, and that is what science shows.

The earth was never in a molten state. Caveman never existed. These are textbook fictions.

For those who believe in intellegent design and creationism.

Does it not bother you that the current pope and the two before him have gone on record stating that evolution is entirely consistant with gods work and that the evidence for it is so overwhelming that they also say that talk of creationism or intellegent design is plainly wrong.

Most christians are catholic and therefore most accept evolution. Its only in america that ID or creationism is even mentioned. It is never even discussed in europe except in reference to the religious right of america.

Or are they part of a conspiracy???

We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes.

We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes.

we weren't created faulty

It was the very beginning, and that is what science shows.

The earth was never in a molten state. Caveman never existed. These are textbook fictions.

We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes.

we weren't created faulty

The earth was never in a molten state. Caveman never existed. These are textbook fictions.

cavemen still exist
and the earth was covered in water, according to Genesis

We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes.

we weren't created faulty

well at least Adam's and Lilith's were...