Look at something as complex as the human eye. It works perfectly as a means of sensory information entering the body, and being processes, then stored by the body.

This could not possibly be the result of random permutations over millions of years.
>>>>> Why? Just saying it can't be is not really an argument. There have been books about this, read them.



Look at all the creatures in nature - if evolution was how we arrived where we are today, there would be millions of other species still 'evolving'.
>>>>> In fact they are still evolving.

DNA is akin to a computer coding system. It has an intelligent design behind it; why do some people still insist that we evolved from gelatenaous goo over millions of years?
>>>>> Because it makes a lot of sense once you really spend time thinking about it.

Anyone who really thinks about it can see we are not just random lifeforms that happen to 'work'. We have been designed, as a car designer tunes, perfects and refines a car when he designs it.
>>>>> see last answer.

I think the truth is, that there is variation in all species, but ultimately, our blueprint has been determined by the DNA structure/sequence inside us.
>>>>> dna both determines your species, and these minor variations, after all about 99% of the dna of every human is the same.

There is plenty of variation between humans - black, white, ginger, chinese, asian, tall, small, attractive, ugly, fat, thin, intelligent, dumb.... the list goes on.
>>>>> yup, especially dumb (sorry)

The 'weaker' variations no longer die out, as we do not live as hunter-gatherers anymore.
>>>>> What? Read up on evolution and mutation, nothing has to die out, we adapt.

I don't think Darwin had it quite right.
>>>>> I don't think you have it quite right.