MARS probe landing, ha, ha, ha, ha, "you couldn't land a probe/rocket using stabilizing thrusters on earth!"

You see too many things, you see things that are not there, like the 90 degrees when in realty there was only 8.

Um, you do see 90 degrees of curvature in that pic.

Yeah, I was wrong about that.

However, get a good pair of binoculars. You'll see I wasn't wrong about what I posted in this thread.

F.Castillo: The Moon's gravity is 1/6th that of the earth, thus, it would take 1/6th the fuel to lift off from the Moon as it did from the Earth. One-sixth the size of the S-IC stage and S-II stage tanks.
[link to www.solcomhouse.com]


But they only had the lunar module gas tank. Get out of here!!

=====================

The Guy: They didn't blast they whole way, they just had to insert themselves into a transfer orbit. Since the Earth is the more massive object of the Earth-moon system, all they had to do to get home was break lunar orbit in the direction of Earth and let Earth's gravity do the rest.

F.Castillo: That's what the other tanks were used for. Pay attention, look at the diagram, slow down alittle with the "disinformation" agenda.

=====================

My information is never "dis."

The Guy:The S-IC and S-II were used to achieve Earth orbit. The S-IVB was used for the trans-lunar injection burn. Everything else was done by the Command and Service Module's engines.

Oh - you mean like the AV8 Harrier does every day here on Earth?

MAR probe doesn't look like a Harrier jet, in case you haven't seen the Probe.

There is no air for this "Harrier Probe" to thrust off. FAIL!

Ha, ha, ha, ha, there is no air on MARS, alot of good a parachute is with no air!
[link to www.youtube.com]

PUNISHER

Yeah, I was wrong about that.

However, get a good pair of binoculars. You'll see I wasn't wrong about what I posted in this thread.

You seem to be wrong about alot of things.

--------------------------------------------


THREAD: Moon Landing Hoax Apollo 17 : Astronauts See Stagehands in The Ceiling Holding Hoses(Wires)
Thread: Moon Landing Hoax Apollo 17 : Astronauts See Stagehands in The Ceiling Holding Hoses(Wires) (Page 3)


Folks look how dis-information is spread.

We have a paid shill no doubt "the Guy" and everyone on the forum who's complimented him are shills as well. Listen to what this "Guy" says;


F.Castillo: The Moon's gravity is 1/6th that of the earth, thus, it would take 1/6th the fuel to lift off from the Moon as it did from the Earth. One-sixth the size of the S-IC stage and S-II stage tanks.
[link to www.solcomhouse.com]


But they only had the lunar module gas tank. Get out of here!!

=====================

The Guy: They didn't blast they whole way, they just had to insert themselves into a transfer orbit. Since the Earth is the more massive object of the Earth-moon system, all they had to do to get home was break lunar orbit in the direction of Earth and let Earth's gravity do the rest.

Here "The Guy" says that once Apollo is outside of the moon's orbit (whatever that means) the ass-straw-nuts would fall back to earth on account of earth's gravity. This means that Apollo 11 was continuously struggling against gravity heading to the Moon and would have needed like a hundred of S-IC & S-II fuel tanks to get to the Moon.

But look at what "The Guy" said on a previous post of his dis-information propaganda.


F.Castillo: That's what the other tanks were used for. Pay attention, look at the diagram, slow down alittle with the "disinformation" agenda.

=====================

My information is never "dis."

The Guy:The S-IC and S-II were used to achieve Earth orbit. The S-IVB was used for the trans-lunar injection burn. Everything else was done by the Command and Service Module's engines.

Here "the Guy" understands that Apollo used the S-IC and S-II fuel tanks to break outside of the earth's atmosphere, but forgets his other lie he will use to keep the confusion going, the other lie about Apollo falling back to earth if ever someone raised questions about the Apollo mission in respect to the fuel tanks.

This means "The Guy" acknowledged he understands the propaganda, but like most liars they lose track of their lies as they spin webs all over the internet with their dis-information.

you said probe, its such a great word

so is thrusters.

Good Lord, what a fucking bonehead.

Does a rocket work in space? Is there any "air" in space?

Think much?

Mars:
"...Carbon dioxide 95.32%..."
"...with a mean surface level pressure of 600 Pa..."
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

This thread is so amazingly stupid. With no understanding of jet propulsion, atmospheric pressure, or fluid dynamics people will turn the other way from the fact that there is a ROBOT created by HUMANS sitting on another planet.

Wow, what a thread.

There is no air on Mars because there is no trees, makes sense.

So the parachute NASA designed is a fail, I'm not surprised this Government branch failed. NASA probably is broadcasting from a secret location here on earth.

This could also mean that Apollo was a fraud as well, all fake. (5*)

Show me a mars probe picture with treeeeees!!!!

Ha, ha, ha, ha, there is no air on MARS, alot of good a parachute is with no air!
[link to www.youtube.com]

You need treeeeees to have air/atmosphere.

Show me a mars probe picture with treeeeees!!!!

Ha, ha, ha, ha, there is no air on MARS, alot of good a parachute is with no air!
[link to www.youtube.com]

You need treeeeees to have air/atmosphere.

==========================

No, you don't.

goddamnit people are stupid.

Show me a mars probe picture with treeeeees!!!!

Ha, ha, ha, ha, there is no air on MARS, alot of good a parachute is with no air!
[link to www.youtube.com]

You need treeeeees to have air/atmosphere.

==========================

No, you don't.


goddamnit people are stupid.

Two fawkin cucumbers that can't prove shit.

Your short replies speaks volume of your inept education and your ill equipped intellect on a discussion board.


Everyone KNOWS that trees produce the air we breathe.

The world wide educational system KNOWS this too, except you two!

lololololol
plants produce the oxygen that we breathe, yes.
air is not simply oxygen, though. air is atmosphere. if there is an atmosphere, there is air, even without oxygen.

you reach new levels of dumb every day, punisher.

lololololol
plants produce the oxygen that we breathe, yes.
air is not simply oxygen, though. air is atmosphere. if there is an atmosphere, there is air, even without oxygen.

you reach new levels of dumb every day, punisher.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, the level of your stupidity has absolutely no bounds, ha, ha, ha, ha, you have successfully proven that infinity exists.


Mars:
"...Carbon dioxide 95.32%..."
"...with a mean surface level pressure of 600 Pa..."
[link to en.wikipedia.org]


Carbon dioxide (chemical formula: CO2) is a chemical compound composed of two oxygen atoms covalently bonded to a single carbon atom.


- For Carbon-dioxide to exist, oxygen has to exist.

- For Oxygen to exist, trees would have to exist.


Get ready for eternity with the rest of your fraternity who are destined for obscurity.

lololololol
plants produce the oxygen that we breathe, yes.
air is not simply oxygen, though. air is atmosphere. if there is an atmosphere, there is air, even without oxygen.

you reach new levels of dumb every day, punisher.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, the level of your stupidity has absolutely no bounds, ha, ha, ha, ha, you have successfully proven that infinity exists.


Mars:
"...Carbon dioxide 95.32%..."
"...with a mean surface level pressure of 600 Pa..."
[link to en.wikipedia.org]


Carbon dioxide (chemical formula: CO2) is a chemical compound composed of two oxygen atoms covalently bonded to a single carbon atom.


- For Carbon-dioxide to exist, oxygen has to exist.

- For Oxygen to exist, trees would have to exist.


Get ready for eternity with the rest of your fraternity who are destined for obscurity.

again, learn the difference between oxygen the element and molecular oxygen. oxygen is the third most abundant element in the entire universe, it isn't exclusively produced by plants.

Two fawkin cucumbers that can't prove shit.

Your short replies speaks volume of your inept education and your ill equipped intellect on a discussion board.


Everyone KNOWS that trees produce the air we breathe.

The world wide educational system KNOWS this too, except you two!

You are the one who doesn't know, if you did, you would have had the pleasure of correcting me.

Only trees (plants) produce the oxygen (gas) that we breath, if not, then science LIED, if so, then SCIENCE lied about this abundant element (oxygen) in the Universe, ha, ha, ha, ha, round and round we go, ha, ha, ha, ha through all the holes of the Swiss cheese of Science!!!

Carbon dioxide is produced by volcanos. Everyone knows this. All plants do is crack the CO2 molecules, use the carbon, and release the oxygen. The fact that Mars' atmosphere is nearly pure CO2 proves that there are no plants on Mars. However, there is air. Just not the kind of air we breathe.

Only trees (plants) produce the oxygen (gas) that we breath.

i've put the important part of that in bold type.

we breathe air that contains molecular oxygen (O2), or free oxygen. we do not breathe pure oxygen, our air (read: atmosphere) contains a number of other gases (78% nitrogen, in particular).

the element of oxygen (O) is a part of countless things, including the earth's crust, our bodies, the soil on mars (iron oxide), etc. the element is actually produced by massive exploding stars in the universe.

Trees make oxygen from carbon dioxide but they don't make elemental oxygen. They can only work with oxygen that is already part of a compound. Elemental oxygen was originally made in supernovas.