My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14143765 United States 08/12/2012 03:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DaNose User ID: 21779236 United States 08/12/2012 03:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | lol, went to the moon. just walked straight through the van allen belts like it's nothing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21797477 Nope, went AROUND them. +100 Exactly That is what I was pointing out earlier. The truth is the truth even if no one believes it and a lie is a lie even if everyone believes it! |
Molech User ID: 21807327 United States 08/12/2012 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14143765 United States 08/12/2012 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5562120 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You see, where did I ever say I was a radiation specialist. I wasn't the one claiming such. I was simply pointing out that you couldn't possibly know to what extent the other poster was educated on the matter. off topic = ignored, why dont you start a thread about what psychic abilities i do and dont have... |
nzreva (OP) User ID: 19624091 United States 08/12/2012 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5562120 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14143765 United States 08/12/2012 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | so fubarman explain how this rover got where it is in the picture without leaving any tracks?? [link to bp0.blogger.com] bp0.blogger.com/_7Bqr1I5gzyk/R519Frk7fOI/AAAAAAAAAPM/AcFZK9C3iWc/s1600-h/moon%2520stuff001.jpg can you??! Watch this video. [link to www.youtube.com] You can see the lunar buggy motoring around on the moon. It hard leaves tracks because it is throwing the powdery mix right back in the groove causing it to fill it's tracks. When you watch the video you can barely see the previous tracks. The foot print does not cover its on track with fine dust. You can see the buggy's tracks from the hubble telescope. The proof that the moon buggy is NOT on the moon can be seen by looking closely at the DUST ITSELF. Notice how the kicked up dust 'ribbons' as it hits atmosphere, before falling back to the ground? If that was on the Moon, there is no atmosphere to stop the dust from flying in an arc for many feet before settling back to the moon's surface. Look closely at the dust being kicked up - it behaves that way because its hitting AIR. So wherever the buggy is, its NOT on the Moon. Case closed. Thank you science. The dust moves in perfect parabolic arcs exactly as it should in ZERO atmosphere aka a vacuum. What would happen if it was "hitting air" would be that some would get suspended and form clouds that gently settle taking far longer to return to the ground. |
nzreva (OP) User ID: 19624091 United States 08/12/2012 03:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | if it was that easy to go to the moon why didn't the russians or chinese do it? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21797477 The Russians tried. They had an active program until 1974 but they couldn't keep their heavy lifting booster from exploding. The Chinese have only recently gotten to space. The moon not space |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14143765 United States 08/12/2012 03:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is scam. Quoting: FubarMan People who under stand facts and science understand that Americans landed on the moon. In 1958 Skunk Works designed a plane that flew faster than a 30-06 bullet for extended periods. The engines were an odd hybrid of a turbo jet and pulse jet with a retracting nose cone to stifle the effects of shock-waves. A decade previous they were dropping nuclear weapons on cities. They had the technology and they went. Interesting why we are not using the space suits to clean up radiation. It would have saved many lives. Interesting that you think all radiation is the same. Gamma and neutron radiation found in nuclear accidents is far more dangerous than particle radiation (alpha and beta) which is the majority found in space. lmao, you have no idea about the composition of the van allen belts!! Far more than you. |
nzreva (OP) User ID: 19624091 United States 08/12/2012 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to en.wikipedia.org] What do the freemans want with the moon? Last Edited by NZREva on 08/12/2012 03:14 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21780518 Croatia 08/12/2012 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is scam. Quoting: FubarMan People who under stand facts and science understand that Americans landed on the moon. In 1958 Skunk Works designed a plane that flew faster than a 30-06 bullet for extended periods. The engines were an odd hybrid of a turbo jet and pulse jet with a retracting nose cone to stifle the effects of shock-waves. A decade previous they were dropping nuclear weapons on cities. They had the technology and they went. RIIIIGHT |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14143765 United States 08/12/2012 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14143765 United States 08/12/2012 03:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | lol, went to the moon. just walked straight through the van allen belts like it's nothing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21797477 Nope, went AROUND them. +100 Exactly That is what I was pointing out earlier. lmao, what about the way back? What about it? they took a similar path. You don't know much about orbital mechanics do you? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13804718 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 03:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14143765 United States 08/12/2012 03:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | if it was that easy to go to the moon why didn't the russians or chinese do it? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21797477 The Russians tried. They had an active program until 1974 but they couldn't keep their heavy lifting booster from exploding. The Chinese have only recently gotten to space. The moon not space Yeah, the Russians had an active MOON program until 1974. The Chinese have only recently gotten into space. You have to get to space before the Moon. What part don't you understand? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21805726 Germany 08/12/2012 03:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21780518 Croatia 08/12/2012 03:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | if it was that easy to go to the moon why didn't the russians or chinese do it? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21797477 The Russians tried. They had an active program until 1974 but they couldn't keep their heavy lifting booster from exploding. The Chinese have only recently gotten to space. Without Russians and their well known rocket technology you and your astromauts would be sitting at home today staring at the stars, or watching Star-trek dreaming how to build warp |
King Triad User ID: 11149913 United States 08/12/2012 03:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5562120 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5562120 What about it? they took a similar path. You don't know much about orbital mechanics do you? i know this much [link to www.braeunig.us] but are you just guesing?? |
DaNose User ID: 21779236 United States 08/12/2012 03:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | if it was that easy to go to the moon why didn't the russians or chinese do it? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21797477 The Russians tried. They had an active program until 1974 but they couldn't keep their heavy lifting booster from exploding. The Chinese have only recently gotten to space. Without Russians and their well known rocket technology you and your astromauts would be sitting at home today staring at the stars, or watching Star-trek dreaming how to build warp O FFS why do you even bother? Does wernher von braun sound Russian to you? The truth is the truth even if no one believes it and a lie is a lie even if everyone believes it! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5562120 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 03:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What about it? they took a similar path. You don't know much about orbital mechanics do you? i know this much [link to www.braeunig.us] but are you just guesing?? but anyway enought about the VARB's your just sidetracking with useless points. |
DaNose User ID: 21779236 United States 08/12/2012 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What about it? they took a similar path. You don't know much about orbital mechanics do you? i know this much [link to www.braeunig.us] but are you just guesing?? If you knew that much then you wouldn't continue your side of the debate my friend. The truth is the truth even if no one believes it and a lie is a lie even if everyone believes it! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5562120 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | explain this, this and this. with 100% closed logic, no room for error. [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp0.blogger.com] [link to i50.tinypic.com] remember no room for error, why no tracks and why are the tracks bigger than the craters?? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5562120 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 03:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What about it? they took a similar path. You don't know much about orbital mechanics do you? i know this much [link to www.braeunig.us] but are you just guesing?? If you knew that much then you wouldn't continue your side of the debate my friend. im not im just wasting your time, likewise. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21594154 Portugal 08/12/2012 03:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | this image shows CLOUDS at top left. Clouds in moon? [link to 2.bp.blogspot.com] Okkkkkk.... |
DaNose User ID: 21779236 United States 08/12/2012 03:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21594154 Portugal 08/12/2012 03:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | explain this, this and this. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5562120 with 100% closed logic, no room for error. [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp0.blogger.com] [link to i50.tinypic.com] remember no room for error, why no tracks and why are the tracks bigger than the craters?? BINGO. It's just impossible to have footprints BELLOW the machine - right where wheels have crossed over. |
BULLDOZER User ID: 9708077 United States 08/12/2012 03:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | explain this, this and this. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5562120 with 100% closed logic, no room for error. [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp0.blogger.com] [link to i50.tinypic.com] remember no room for error, why no tracks and why are the tracks bigger than the craters?? I would like to hear this explained... I will never believe we landed on the moon, I don't care what anyone say's. If something doesn't make sense... IT'S A LIE! NON SERVIAM |
odinson222 User ID: 1138685 United States 08/12/2012 03:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | odinson222 A Man Has Got to Know His Limitations I am just a sinner trying to make it to heaven! Romans 8:35-39 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us. For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. |