Where is Mercury! And Venus Out of Place!

The dates for the transits are approximate. They have always been approximate as the orbit of SOHO is not 100% guaranteed (SOHO has and will have problems considering it's troubled first years - they almost lost it - and it's age).

Oh my, and predicted to have a Mag +4 too, during this time. But too faint! I don't believe you at all.

We have 'kinda' right and now approximate! Yeah sure.

that's a Frantic Liar's ruin!

Your personal testimony wipes out ALL the misfunction of SOHO and Sterio Ahead, indeed. Thank you A/C for settling this issue!

And none of us believe you.

Why do you continue to harp on NASA when the transit dates are from a US Navy site and SOHO is not even a prime US satellite -

It's a joint ESA/NASA operation and the satellite was built by Marconic (Astrium) which even isn't a US company?

You going to start accusing the ESA of being in on the conspiracy?

nice try

Sorry, did that, not there. You posted too soon. Wait until NASA has had a chance to doctor their images, post dated and all too. Right NOW, it is utterly missing, as I demonstrated in my original post.

By the way, is SOHO being delayed in updating new images at the present time?

Awww, someone ELSE who can't read. Just go back to shopping honey, I know its a scary thought that the government is lying to you. JFK was killed by a single bullet too.

I, too, was wondering why Venus would show up on the right of the sun on the Stereo Ahead Cor2. That satellite would have to be waaay ahead for it to be there unless it's all in reverse. Here's a solar system chart, just plug in a date and it will show you where all the planets are. Venus is behind and to the left of the Sun and Mercury is right between us and the Sun.

[link to www.fourmilab.ch]

Good morning, Nancy,

I cannot speak to Mercury, but---

Though it's been raining for days now, in the Ohio Valley, I thought I saw Venus, as the Morning Star, last week; during the last clear sky at Dawn.

Was that not Venus? Or it is now, currently, out of place--- since then?

SOZT

Nancy, you're sacked.

EOZT

According to your own chart, Venus SHOULD be in stereo ahead, the "A" satellite, right where it appears in your image; if you follow the line drawn by A to the sun past the sun you'll find it shows that Venus should be just to the right of the sun from STEREO Ahead's perspective... which it is. You're wrong as usual nancy. Venus is right where it's supposed to be. Shall I do a live broadcast showing how my telescope can locate it with exact precision? As long as I wrap it up by 10pm I can do it.

I believe you tend to see what you are looking for. If you look for inconsistencies you see inconsistencies and if you look for congruencies you see congruencies. Stop looking for gloom and doom when there is so much beauty to be seen.

How did you determine it wasn't "behind" (farther than) the sun in that image? You can't tell one way or the other just by looking at a single 2D picture unless you have additional information such as resolving the phase of the disc. I've got news for you Nancy, it IS "behind" the sun, which is why it's currently in a most-full gibbous phase right now as seen from earth.

Last Edited by Astromut on 04/26/2010 09:50 AM

Once again, Nancy cries wolf, only to be proven utterly (and hilariously) wrong.

Not a big surprise, when her strongest ally is sheet-soiling Andrew, Dumbfuskistan's most erudite citizen!

Wrong.

Also wrong. It was an amateur who first reported a dark spot on jupiter where there shouldn't be one, which turned out to be an impact mark.

There, I addressed it, happy?

Stop drinking the NASA coolaid, dupe.

Teehee on zetasquawk, they don't know squat, er squawk.

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

Debunking the Debunkers: The Correct Definition of Trimester
Around here, you hear the word "trimester" used a lot, specifically in the phrase "magnetic trimester." We have had a number of new members come from another website out of curiosity, quoting an erroneous definition they picked up off that website (which shall remain nameless) and I thought I would take the opportunity to correct the misinformation (a process also known as "debunking").

From definition.com:

Trimester (noun)
1. a term or period of 3 months;
2. one of the three approximately equal terms into which the year is divided by some colleges, schools, etc.

And from the medical dictionary:

a period of three or about three months
especially : any of three periods of approximately three months each into which a
human pregnancy is divided

Origin & History:

1815–25; < F trimestre < L trim&#275;(n)stris of three months, equiv. to tri- tri + -m&#275;(n)stris (see semester) The word originated in 1821, "period of three months," from Fr. trimestre (1611), from L. trimestris "of three months," from tri- "three" + mensis "month" (see moon (n.)). Specific obstetrics sense is attested from 1916.

So, obviously, the word simply means a period of three months, with the specialized obstetrical usage appearing later. Nowhere can I find any definition that states that a trimester is always "a division of a larger period that is a multiple of 3" or some such nonsense. And, obviously, the usage as a year-round school schedule is not erroneous, either.

Now, if the originators of the misinformation about the term "trimester" can't even get that right, who can believe anything else that the say, eh?

The 12-month calendar is divided into three parts as pertains magnetic influences:

January - April (the weakest)
May - August (the strongest)
September - December (the middle strength)

For more correct information, see [link to www.zetatalk.com]

Right where it should be.

Prove your slanderous claim.

Right where it should be, in such a tiny crescent phase as to be invisible. The current phase of mercury looks like this:
[link to aa.usno.navy.mil]
Good luck spotting that. If Mercury were on the opposite side of the sun it would be at full phase and you'd see it in the SOHO images.

Bullshit. It's there. You're just too blind to see it.

It's obvious as hell coming from left to right.

Why don't you look at the original, unprocessed fits images for SOHO?

Still can't address the issues, eh? LOSER!

Nancy is getting wackier by the week.

Only 20 months left...

I don't think sooooo!

[link to www.youtube.com]

Semantics? That's pretty pathetic of you to bring that one up considering that trimester = tri (three) mester (months). If you bother to look at school calendars, you'll see that those that use a supposed "trimester" system do not have each trimester equaling four months - the maximum is sixteen weeks which is short of four months.


Here's some proof you're wrong:
[link to www.zetasquawk.com]
[link to www.zetasquawk.com]

So when are you going to learn the difference between the Richter scale and the magnitude scales that the USGS and all the rest of the seismological agencies use?

We wondered yesterday what has happened to Venus, wasnt sure is it Venus or Planet X
Thread: --->NIBIRU UPDATE (APRIL 25)

thank god for sanity! sometimes this site is like talking to people who believe the earth is 2500 years old.

You're right, though. I can't really be bothered.

But at least you managed to spell 'loser' right this time.




:ten:



:alienbanan: :alienbanan: :alienbanan: