Obviously we are killing ourselves..ancient people showed very little signs of cancer.. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1037013 United States 10/15/2010 09:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They didn't live long onough to get cancer! Lifespan was significantly shorter than ours is today. Quoting: SickscentThats a really good point... How do we know what the average age of death was for those cultures? |
hoot no more/hasheater User ID: 1130997 United Kingdom 10/15/2010 09:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was a green monkey cancer virus called SV 40 placed on purpose in all the "polio" vaccines we all got injected with starting near 60 years ago...............bet, that is the cancer "gene" they are testing for now |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1104808 United States 10/15/2010 09:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | yeah whatever Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1129508lots of exercise no gmo foods hardly any vices dead before 30 thats a good plan for avoiding cancer , hell if we just adopted the dead before 30 plan cancer would be a non issue in todays world Life Span issues Chemicals in the environment (we could NOT support even 20% of today's worl population without the heavy use of chemicals ... thus they have become a necessary evil in today's enviroment ... though of course we should try to eliminate those we find are bad and to limit as much as possible the use of all others) |
OTOC User ID: 1129801 United Kingdom 10/15/2010 09:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I blame it on... 'medicine' ... Take this pill for a cold a bit of it gets stuck by mucus to your throat lining, you don't realise (why would you).. you go to sleep, you wake up next morning and then it's too late, those cells have had an extremely high dose of whatever 'medicine' and have likely become very toxic, (combined with possible bacteria and virus, say if you were taking something for a.. cold) white blood cells attack that area. Virus and bacteria are flung everywhere, toxins released as cells are destroyed leaving you a nice toxin ridden infected cellular hole in your throat, then you go outside and take a deep breathe of a car exhaust, or some burnt... whatever and the toxins from the over-medicated area interact witht he particles of 'pollution' and bam cancer ;) lol Of course it doesn't happen like that.... ... But ya get the point.. I think that our 'medicine' plays a large role in creating cancer. That and we can make a lot of cancerous people survive so much longer and so it spreads to a greater number of the population over the generations. Do away with cancer! Kill all those infected! :D Lol - Marked for 7 days :) (the real objective) Last Edited by OTOC on 10/15/2010 09:37 AM Solar Storms, Your basic guide: Thread: Solar Storms, Your Basic Guide. AC 1082864 - "This post was sponsored by OTOC. If you watch any doom on November 4, watch katla!" Yellowstone - 2024, some time after june. |
Anglecynn User ID: 713050 Ireland 10/15/2010 09:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This was in today's Telegraph (UK) Cancer caused by modern man as it was virtually non-existent in ancient world [link to www.telegraph.co.uk] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1123608 United States 10/15/2010 09:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Tali User ID: 1131059 United States 10/15/2010 09:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1131036 Germany 10/15/2010 09:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1130914 United States 10/15/2010 09:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The overall incidence rate for childhood cancers has increased significantly by almost 33% during the period 1975 to 2001 Quoting: <<LOOK`n thru YOU>>And so has the US population... Not by 33%...lol...keep your head in the sand..Life will be easier FFS [link to www.censusscope.org] Add in the fact that Doctor's awareness of these childhood ailments has gone up exponentially, and that diagnosis techniques have come out of the dark ages, and there is your 33%, Sparky... It's obvious whose head is in the sand... |
Tali User ID: 1131059 United States 10/15/2010 09:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
<<LOOK`n thru YOU>> (OP) User ID: 922574 United States 10/15/2010 09:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The overall incidence rate for childhood cancers has increased significantly by almost 33% during the period 1975 to 2001 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1130914And so has the US population... Not by 33%...lol...keep your head in the sand..Life will be easier FFS [link to www.censusscope.org] Add in the fact that Doctor's awareness of these childhood ailments has gone up exponentially, and that diagnosis techniques have come out of the dark ages, and there is your 33%, Sparky... It's obvious whose head is in the sand... I`m seeing about 13%..not 33%...NOT TO MENTION---THEY ARE ONLY TALKING ABOUT CHILDREN, not the whole population Last Edited by <<LOOK`n thru YOU>> on 10/15/2010 09:50 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1130801 United Kingdom 10/15/2010 09:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | we all should be dead by 70 anyway. Past that is a waste.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 997890I'll have your donated years, thanks, and anyone else who thinks fucking 'three score years and ten' is all you're worth. [coughs]Asshole.[/coughs] |
nzreva User ID: 1063963 United States 10/15/2010 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's our lifestyles and what we CONSUME... Quoting: TaliFructose Fuels Cancer Cell Growth? [link to www.vegsource.com] Jack LaLane at 97 [link to www.vegsource.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 699917 United States 10/15/2010 09:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This brings up another area that I have always wondered about...the Central America and South America civilizations seemed to have very little disease, as well as the American Indians. Quoting: SickscentDiabetes, heart disease and dental decay were unknown in the indigenous Western populations until they were "introduced" to the European diet. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1059918 United Kingdom 10/15/2010 09:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They didn't live long onough to get cancer! Lifespan was significantly shorter than ours is today. Quoting: SickscentThats a really good point... Yes but people are getting cancers at really young age now. It is not uncommon for someone in their 20's and 30's to get cancer. |
Tali User ID: 1131059 United States 10/15/2010 09:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 618413 United States 10/15/2010 09:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1127517 Denmark 10/15/2010 09:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
<<LOOK`n thru YOU>> (OP) User ID: 922574 United States 10/15/2010 09:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What kinds of animals rarely get cancers? Quoting: TaliHave you seen a bird with cancer? Not sure there are many species at all that don`t get affected.. [link to www.birdchannel.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1018718 United States 10/15/2010 09:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nzreva User ID: 1063963 United States 10/15/2010 09:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What kinds of animals rarely get cancers? Quoting: TaliHave you seen a bird with cancer? Yes Chicken parts are cut out of chickens all the time and the rest of the Chicken is sold as chicken parts, it is very common |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1059918 United Kingdom 10/15/2010 09:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is a school of scientific thought that disease is a stepping stone in evolution. there is a some trade off and/or it slowly rids the gene pool of faulty genes. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1123608That is true actually - back in the days when there was no chemo and cancer treatment, those people would have died and therefore the faulty gene would have been removed from the gene pool. Nowadays that person would survive and have children. Diabetes (type 1) was less prominant as well because there was no insulin so anyone with diabetes would have just died when they were babies, now the diabetes gene gets passed on. |
<<LOOK`n thru YOU>> (OP) User ID: 922574 United States 10/15/2010 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is a school of scientific thought that disease is a stepping stone in evolution. there is a some trade off and/or it slowly rids the gene pool of faulty genes. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1059918That is true actually - back in the days when there was no chemo and cancer treatment, those people would have died and therefore the faulty gene would have been removed from the gene pool. Nowadays that person would survive and have children. Diabetes (type 1) was less prominant as well because there was no insulin so anyone with diabetes would have just died when they were babies, now the diabetes gene gets passed on. Very interesting perspective...so the will to live through medicine could have created even more disease..The "natural course" was altered...In ancient civilizations you would have just died therefor not carrying on the gene..shit that makes sense from a naturalist stand point... But now everything is loaded with cancer causing chemicals/toxins including the air and water..so now the numbers increase... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1040447 United States 10/15/2010 10:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | yeah the nfl is supporting national cancer awareness month and a sports board i belong too i brought this up the other day about how little signs of cancer are in the archeological record, not sure they believed me think most cancers are an engineered virus or fungus of some sort but you can bet if there is ever a one pill cure or course of antibiotics you could take to get rid of it it would never receive mainstream exposure, the big money is in long term expensive treatments not short term cures |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1123608 United States 10/15/2010 10:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is a school of scientific thought that disease is a stepping stone in evolution. there is a some trade off and/or it slowly rids the gene pool of faulty genes. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1059918That is true actually - back in the days when there was no chemo and cancer treatment, those people would have died and therefore the faulty gene would have been removed from the gene pool. Nowadays that person would survive and have children. Diabetes (type 1) was less prominant as well because there was no insulin so anyone with diabetes would have just died when they were babies, now the diabetes gene gets passed on. this idea will go on to say that disease will eventually show up to strengthen the gene pool, not weaken it. |
<<LOOK`n thru YOU>> (OP) User ID: 922574 United States 10/15/2010 10:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is a school of scientific thought that disease is a stepping stone in evolution. there is a some trade off and/or it slowly rids the gene pool of faulty genes. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1123608That is true actually - back in the days when there was no chemo and cancer treatment, those people would have died and therefore the faulty gene would have been removed from the gene pool. Nowadays that person would survive and have children. Diabetes (type 1) was less prominant as well because there was no insulin so anyone with diabetes would have just died when they were babies, now the diabetes gene gets passed on. this idea will go on to say that disease will eventually show up to strengthen the gene pool, not weaken it. I doubt our bodies can adapt fast enough...but who knows. The human body is an amazing thing |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1130914 United States 10/15/2010 10:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The overall incidence rate for childhood cancers has increased significantly by almost 33% during the period 1975 to 2001 Quoting: <<LOOK`n thru YOU>>And so has the US population... Not by 33%...lol...keep your head in the sand..Life will be easier FFS [link to www.censusscope.org] Add in the fact that Doctor's awareness of these childhood ailments has gone up exponentially, and that diagnosis techniques have come out of the dark ages, and there is your 33%, Sparky... It's obvious whose head is in the sand... ====================== I`m seeing about 13%..not 33%...NOT TO MENTION---THEY ARE ONLY TALKING ABOUT CHILDREN, not the whole population Try this instead: [link to www.u-s-history.com] 1970 213,302,031 2000 291,421,906 That's an increase of appx 78,119,875 according to the US Census... Now...How much of an increase in population is that again? |
<<LOOK`n thru YOU>> (OP) User ID: 922574 United States 10/15/2010 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The overall incidence rate for childhood cancers has increased significantly by almost 33% during the period 1975 to 2001 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1130914And so has the US population... Not by 33%...lol...keep your head in the sand..Life will be easier FFS [link to www.censusscope.org] Add in the fact that Doctor's awareness of these childhood ailments has gone up exponentially, and that diagnosis techniques have come out of the dark ages, and there is your 33%, Sparky... It's obvious whose head is in the sand... ====================== I`m seeing about 13%..not 33%...NOT TO MENTION---THEY ARE ONLY TALKING ABOUT CHILDREN, not the whole population Try this instead: [link to www.u-s-history.com] 1970 213,302,031 2000 291,421,906 That's an increase of appx 78,119,875 according to the US Census... Now...How much of an increase in population is that again? Once again...the article is discussing children only--so if you can do the math on that just keep on laughing...You can`t figure it out. The study was on children only now quit trying to NOT make yourself look stupid |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 865798 United States 10/15/2010 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They didn't live long onough to get cancer! Lifespan was significantly shorter than ours is today. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1059918Thats a really good point... Yes but people are getting cancers at really young age now. It is not uncommon for someone in their 20's and 30's to get cancer. Yeah, and the comment about pets getting cancer is valid as well. I know a ton of people who have had to put their dog down because of cancer. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1129508 United States 10/15/2010 10:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |