| Users Online Now: 2,469 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,957,852 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,714,554 | Threads Today: 662 | Posts Today: 12,768 |
| 08:44 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,469 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,957,852 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,714,554 | Threads Today: 662 | Posts Today: 12,768 |
| 08:44 PM | ||
BREAKING Mystery Missile Launch Seen off Calif. Coast | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1154127  United States11/09/2010 11:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cover story? After the fact? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1154135Alert CREATED: 08 NOV 20:52 2010 Nov 8th at 8PM central time Time of restriction CLOSED. SURFACE - FL390, 09 NOV 20:00 2010 UNTIL 10 NOV 01:00 2010 No it needs to be closed from at least 3pm Monday 8th of November the launch was at approx 5pm or a bit before maybe. I thought someone said this was/is created in GMT time...so, I think LA is -8 hours off of GMT time...so wouldn't you knock 8 hours off of this? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1157924 United States11/09/2010 11:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why exactly are we paying these pukes then?????.... PENTAGON HAS 'NO CLUE' WHO LAUNCHED MISSILE [link to www.nbcsandiego.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1154135  Australia11/09/2010 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just supposition but... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1118614What if it were a pre-emptive 'fake'... Say in a few days they decide they want to create a false flag - nuke attack... They can't launch from a silo on to US land - obvious self attack... They couldn't launch from your own waters from a sub because that also would be obviously your own vehicle??? Unless of course they now have 'Plausible Deniability' in saying that a sub launch from 'unknown' vessel has indeed launched from US water before - "It was captured by (our) the media". ??? Whata dumb ass 35 miles off the coast is international waters.So it wasn't launched from "US" waters. The territorial waters of the US and every other country only extend out 12 nautical miles. Its within the exclusive economic zone dunbass have a think for a moment well within the economic zone of 200nm's. Reading comprehension is obviously not what it used to be. An exclusive economic zone extends from the outer limit of the territorial sea to a maximum of 200 nautical miles (370.4 km) from the territorial sea baseline, thus it includes the contiguous zone.[3] A coastal nation has control of all economic resources within its exclusive economic zone, including fishing, mining, oil exploration, and any pollution of those resources.Indeed, the exclusive economic zone is still popularly, though erroneously, called a coastal nation's territorial waters. [link to en.wikipedia.org] I've already said you are being pedantic really. I didn't state 'territorial' waters - but the US will consider 35 miles off their coast 'their' waters - i.e. their's to control and know what 'goes' there. You seem to be deliberately distracting people from the point of my post... To elaborate on it now... Not only would this lend the 'Plausible deniability' card to a possible future 'false flag'... It is disconcerting that although flight plans were altered, the FAA knew nothing either... Plus the media chopper plus at least one other were just in the right place and time... They may be seeding the public mind for what is to come?! So I shall elaborate Yeah off the coast of their outer most land claim. Have a think. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1152061 United States11/09/2010 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Mercurius User ID: 1158087 United States11/09/2010 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1158088  Norway11/09/2010 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just supposition but... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1118614What if it were a pre-emptive 'fake'... Say in a few days they decide they want to create a false flag - nuke attack... They can't launch from a silo on to US land - obvious self attack... They couldn't launch from your own waters from a sub because that also would be obviously your own vehicle??? Unless of course they now have 'Plausible Deniability' in saying that a sub launch from 'unknown' vessel has indeed launched from US water before - "It was captured by (our) the media". ???  |
| don Q User ID: 1063239  Canada11/09/2010 11:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | demonstration of American military might....no way! The world already knows about that. Wake up!! This was a demonstration from China..and Russia knew in advance or it would have launched on warning. There are no unanounced ICBM launches....ever. WWIII is imminent. G20 |
ecantinho  User ID: 648343  France11/09/2010 11:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: ecantinho nobody ? Ch'ti qui pisse tint l'biloute din ch'main. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1157037 United States11/09/2010 11:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just supposition but... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1154135What if it were a pre-emptive 'fake'... Say in a few days they decide they want to create a false flag - nuke attack... They can't launch from a silo on to US land - obvious self attack... They couldn't launch from your own waters from a sub because that also would be obviously your own vehicle??? Unless of course they now have 'Plausible Deniability' in saying that a sub launch from 'unknown' vessel has indeed launched from US water before - "It was captured by (our) the media". ??? Whata dumb ass 35 miles off the coast is international waters.So it wasn't launched from "US" waters. The territorial waters of the US and every other country only extend out 12 nautical miles. WRONG!!!! Territorial waters of the U.S. extend 200mi. of the coast. been that way since the 1970s. Stupid must be contagious. Territorial waters, or a territorial sea, as defined by the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea[1], is a belt of coastal waters extending at most 12 nautical miles (22 km; 14 mi) from the baseline (usually the mean low-water mark) of a coastal state. The territorial sea is regarded as the sovereign territory of the state, although foreign ships (both military and civilian) are allowed innocent passage through it; this sovereignty also extends to the airspace over and seabed below. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Not by the U.S. standard. Nixon extended the range and it was approved by the U.N. at the time. We were the power at the time and the U.N. had no choice in the matter. WRONG!!! This is 12 miles from the outer most land claim you realize? Outer most Island? Wrong its based on the baseline which is defined as the low water mark. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 176293 11/09/2010 11:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We know it's ours. The helicopter shows this. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1157991That is... given that it was there to monitor the missile launch. What if it was there to identify an unidentified object in the sea? When the object suddenly launched an ICBM? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1154135 Australia11/09/2010 11:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cover story? After the fact? Quoting: RockhuffAlert CREATED: 08 NOV 20:52 2010 Nov 8th at 8PM central time Time of restriction CLOSED. SURFACE - FL390, 09 NOV 20:00 2010 UNTIL 10 NOV 01:00 2010 No it needs to be closed from at least 3pm Monday 8th of November the launch was at approx 5pm or a bit before maybe. I thought someone said this was/is created in GMT time...so, I think LA is -8 hours off of GMT time...so wouldn't you knock 8 hours off of this? Isn't it in local time? Even still 8 hours off 20:00 on the 9th? How does that relate to 5pm on the 8th? |
| dfw User ID: 672403 United States11/09/2010 11:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I didn't see the launch, but I saw something that looked like a fighter plane at a very high altitude going south. Looked to be above 10,000 feet, and it had to be going at least Mach 2. What I noticed was the very short contrail behind it. I think it was a cruise missile headed SE. This was about 5:00pm in San Diego. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 638139 United States11/09/2010 11:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why exactly are we paying these pukes then?????.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1157924PENTAGON HAS 'NO CLUE' WHO LAUNCHED MISSILE [link to www.nbcsandiego.com] OK RECAP NAVY DENIES IT PENTAGON DENIES IT FAA DENIES KNOWING WE ARE F'd |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1155121 United States11/09/2010 11:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why exactly are we paying these pukes then?????.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 638139PENTAGON HAS 'NO CLUE' WHO LAUNCHED MISSILE [link to www.nbcsandiego.com] OK RECAP NAVY DENIES IT PENTAGON DENIES IT FAA DENIES KNOWING WE ARE F'd Still waiting for a response from the alien mothership. Should be anytime now. |
| TheWatcher User ID: 997697 United States11/09/2010 11:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cover story? After the fact? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1154135Alert CREATED: 08 NOV 20:52 2010 Nov 8th at 8PM central time Time of restriction CLOSED. SURFACE - FL390, 09 NOV 20:00 2010 UNTIL 10 NOV 01:00 2010 No it needs to be closed from at least 3pm Monday 8th of November the launch was at approx 5pm or a bit before maybe. I thought someone said this was/is created in GMT time...so, I think LA is -8 hours off of GMT time...so wouldn't you knock 8 hours off of this? Isn't it in local time? Even still 8 hours off 20:00 on the 9th? How does that relate to 5pm on the 8th? I believe it's UTC time, which is five hours before me. ie, at 7PM my time it is 24:00 their time. Cali is 2 hours before my time, ie, when 7PM here, it's 5PM there. But since this is UTC, this is way late for this launch. Last Edited by TheWatcher on 11/09/2010 12:00 PM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1043757 United States11/09/2010 11:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1154135 Australia11/09/2010 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just supposition but... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1157037What if it were a pre-emptive 'fake'... Say in a few days they decide they want to create a false flag - nuke attack... They can't launch from a silo on to US land - obvious self attack... They couldn't launch from your own waters from a sub because that also would be obviously your own vehicle??? Unless of course they now have 'Plausible Deniability' in saying that a sub launch from 'unknown' vessel has indeed launched from US water before - "It was captured by (our) the media". ??? Whata dumb ass 35 miles off the coast is international waters.So it wasn't launched from "US" waters. The territorial waters of the US and every other country only extend out 12 nautical miles. WRONG!!!! Territorial waters of the U.S. extend 200mi. of the coast. been that way since the 1970s. Stupid must be contagious. Territorial waters, or a territorial sea, as defined by the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea[1], is a belt of coastal waters extending at most 12 nautical miles (22 km; 14 mi) from the baseline (usually the mean low-water mark) of a coastal state. The territorial sea is regarded as the sovereign territory of the state, although foreign ships (both military and civilian) are allowed innocent passage through it; this sovereignty also extends to the airspace over and seabed below. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Not by the U.S. standard. Nixon extended the range and it was approved by the U.N. at the time. We were the power at the time and the U.N. had no choice in the matter. WRONG!!! This is 12 miles from the outer most land claim you realize? Outer most Island? Wrong its based on the baseline which is defined as the low water mark. [link to upload.wikimedia.org] Think of the Islands out there that are part of the US run a line around |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1157037 United States11/09/2010 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why exactly are we paying these pukes then?????.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 638139PENTAGON HAS 'NO CLUE' WHO LAUNCHED MISSILE [link to www.nbcsandiego.com] OK RECAP NAVY DENIES IT PENTAGON DENIES IT FAA DENIES KNOWING WE ARE F'd Yet they knew enough to reroute flights out of LAX to north to south pattern. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1107597 United States11/09/2010 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Beck is just speculating just like everyone else here. Somthing happened. The government is not tell nor will they ever tell us. It was fired off shore and to the west. Maybe it was going to knock out AF one enroute to Indonesia. Thus begins a military coup. Its as good a theory as any. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1154127 United States11/09/2010 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cover story? After the fact? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1154135Alert CREATED: 08 NOV 20:52 2010 Nov 8th at 8PM central time Time of restriction CLOSED. SURFACE - FL390, 09 NOV 20:00 2010 UNTIL 10 NOV 01:00 2010 No it needs to be closed from at least 3pm Monday 8th of November the launch was at approx 5pm or a bit before maybe. I thought someone said this was/is created in GMT time...so, I think LA is -8 hours off of GMT time...so wouldn't you knock 8 hours off of this? Isn't it in local time? Even still 8 hours off 20:00 on the 9th? How does that relate to 5pm on the 8th? Yeah, I didn't do the math..Somewhere a couple pages back, someone posted the GMT info..I know nothing about these postings. Didn't even know they existed |
| Least Servant User ID: 1062754 United States11/09/2010 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | glp'rs = non logic Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1152061More like lacking in background knowledge. If you are working with the premise that Nikola Tesla personally designed all Chinese and Russian military equipment, channeled through the grandson of the second counsin of Rasputin who works as a medium in a backalley in Omsk, then it might make more sense to think this stuff... Last Edited by Least Servant on 11/09/2010 12:00 PM :romaflag: Not enough to fight, too many to die. |
| mishka User ID: 1114406 United States11/09/2010 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wasnt there something a week or two ago about US nuke missiles went off line? Now think about it people.....Ur asking the wrong questions. What should be asked is....Who could launch a US missile other then the US? There is a rogue nation that has been involved in our communication systems for over 20 years. Now if this rogue nation has gotten launch codes and can manipulate our communication systems, they can launch a US missile. Why would this rogue nation do such a thing? The reason is that this rogue nation is telling the US to do what we want or this can happen. Those who have insight already know who this rogue nation is. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1151634 United States11/09/2010 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1155121 United States11/09/2010 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | demonstration of American military might....no way! Quoting: don Q 1063239The world already knows about that. Wake up!! This was a demonstration from China..and Russia knew in advance or it would have launched on warning. There are no unanounced ICBM launches....ever. WWIII is imminent. G20  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1106626 United States11/09/2010 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Janey User ID: 1156717  United Kingdom11/09/2010 12:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NOTAM= notice to airmen Quoting: Anonymous Coward 115114109 NOV 20:00 2010 UNTIL 10 NOV 01:00 2010 This was launched 8th of November 5 pm doesn't match. NOTAM is in GMT Zulu Time not local, it does match. 2000 GMT 9th Nov is 2 hours from now, definitely not last night :) |
| Least Servant User ID: 1062754 United States11/09/2010 12:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | demonstration of American military might....no way! Quoting: don Q 1063239The world already knows about that. Wake up!! This was a demonstration from China..and Russia knew in advance or it would have launched on warning. There are no unanounced ICBM launches....ever. WWIII is imminent. G20  :romaflag: Not enough to fight, too many to die. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 879868 United States11/09/2010 12:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wasnt there something a week or two ago about US nuke missiles went off line? Quoting: mishka 1114406Now think about it people.....Ur asking the wrong questions. What should be asked is....Who could launch a US missile other then the US? There is a rogue nation that has been involved in our communication systems for over 20 years. Now if this rogue nation has gotten launch codes and can manipulate our communication systems, they can launch a US missile. Why would this rogue nation do such a thing? The reason is that this rogue nation is telling the US to do what we want or this can happen. Those who have insight already know who this rogue nation is. Stuxnet |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1156615 United States11/09/2010 12:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | demonstration of American military might....no way! Quoting: don Q 1063239The world already knows about that. Wake up!! This was a demonstration from China..and Russia knew in advance or it would have launched on warning. There are no unanounced ICBM launches....ever. WWIII is imminent. G20 BINGO~!~~~ RUSSIAN retaliation would have been instantanious if america launched. THIS WAS CHINESE flexing muscle. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1154135 Australia11/09/2010 12:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cover story? After the fact? Quoting: TheWatcherAlert CREATED: 08 NOV 20:52 2010 Nov 8th at 8PM central time Time of restriction CLOSED. SURFACE - FL390, 09 NOV 20:00 2010 UNTIL 10 NOV 01:00 2010 No it needs to be closed from at least 3pm Monday 8th of November the launch was at approx 5pm or a bit before maybe. I thought someone said this was/is created in GMT time...so, I think LA is -8 hours off of GMT time...so wouldn't you knock 8 hours off of this? Isn't it in local time? Even still 8 hours off 20:00 on the 9th? How does that relate to 5pm on the 8th? I believe it's UTC time, which is five hours before me. ie, at 7PM my time it is 24:00 their time. Yeah on the 9th launch was on 8th 5pm local time. |
