Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology

I've the feeling, that, by reading the comment and the answers that follow, one could still be confused or unsure if Mr.Scott's calculations in the end are correct or not.

(If somebody needs some sort of credibility or just to underline my qualifications, I'm a physicist too.) .

First, to be clear, Mr.Scott's calculations are correct. There are no mathematical errors as far as I can see.

Just to summarize the calculations of the electric field due to various spherically symmetric charge distributions:

In the centre we have got a positively charged sphere (the sun).
We look at the E-field inside the heliosphere (= plasmasphere of the sun) for different cases of charge density in this very region (those are the boundary conditions of course).

Case 1: positive charged sphere (sun) in the middle, no charge density inside heliosphere (case 2 on page 4 of the paper)
-> the E field decreases with the second power of the distance to the sun. (this is the case Physicist is mainly talking about as a ' fairly basic problem')

But now we assume non-zero charge density inside the heliosphere ... and the assumption is based on various observations of steady presence of charged particles inside the heliosphere due to solar wind and CME's for instance ... no references needed here I think.

Case 2: positive charged sphere in the middle, constant positive charge density inside heliosphere (case 5 on page 4 of the paper)
-> the E field increases linearly with the distance.

Case 3: positive charged sphere in the middle, constant negative charge density inside heliosphere (also case 5 on page 4 of the paper)
-> the E field decreases linearly with the distance.

Case 4: positive charged sphere in the middle, positive charge density decreases linearly with distance inside heliosphere (case 4 on page 4 of the paper)
-> the E-field inside the heliosphere is constant

Other cases of not constant charge density inside heliosphere will lead to E-field variations between the above mentioned cases (See Scott's paper for details).

charge/electricity
energy/information

why should we think about charge?
this question is being debated now by our authorities and nasa has been looking at this for some time

example:
On March 16 2009 Dr. Donald E. Scott gave a presentation of electric universe concepts to a gathering at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, which appeared to be well-received by many of the attendees.

currently one of the topics debated is charge/electricity and this is a reason why:

[link to members.cox.net]



we on earth were always within a fluctuation charge environment before we entered the magnetic cloud named fluffy

the question is really, what effect does charge/electricity have upon us and our environment

what is the connection

As you know, in my own personal dream life, it damn sure has!

you have to be correct just a dude and it`s an important point

what we are within will contain memory and we will increasingly experience "deja vu" type feelings as effects increase

i imagine

i know siclscent think you started a trend

so would that mean it`s not me having done this before but within earth past
somebody like me has done similar things for the same reasons , the times we are within
that gives me deja vu now although it was not me originally within our past

fuck

same for others
which is why with one person it crops up a lot with for me as in, i often get deja vu interacting with them

we have not changed

it is our environment that altered

we know this

our human formed archetypes, to survive, must know this also

impossible to consider in any time before now

this time of archetypes, unnatural to us but natural to all else, energising and synchronising as never experienced by humankind within this environment

one human archetype appears bigger than others probably because it is symbolizing all natural archetypes of form

The Eye of Providence (or the all-seeing eye of God) is a symbol showing an eye often surrounded by rays of light or a glory and usually enclosed by a triangle. It is sometimes interpreted as representing the eye of God watching over humankind
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

this is what our human eye of providence archetype is wary of

The stars in all galaxies must move otherwise they would fall toward the center and create a gigantic black hole. By spinning, galaxies avoid that fate. Some irregular galaxies exist with stars going every which way. Gravity makes some stars give energy to other stars so some will fall toward the center of those galaxies. That might make irregular galaxies start spinning. Nobody knows, but irregular galaxies should have a whole lot more stars drop toward the center than happens in a regular galaxy. That should make the black hole spin. A black hole gives off tremendous gravity. It gives off more as stars fall into it. That should start the galaxy spinning.

the eye of providence is vortical physics (vortice)

All physical existences are weaved in vortical motion; nothing physical in nature is not vortical.
[link to uvs-model.com]

our eye of providence has discovered two things recently

it is an effect caused by our non material dimension of charge/field/rotation

at it`s most magnificent manifested scale within our infinite universe, the eye of all galaxies (eye of providence), is within it`s heart, is a plasmoid

A plasmoid is a coherent structure of plasma and magnetic fields`

our eye of providence has discovered two things recently

it is an effect caused by our non material dimension of charge/field/rotation

at it`s most magnificent manifested scale within our infinite universe, the eye of all galaxies (eye of providence), is within it`s heart, is a plasmoid

A plasmoid is a coherent structure of plasma and magnetic fields`

The Eye of Providence (or the all-seeing eye of God) is a symbol showing an eye often surrounded by rays of light or a glory and usually enclosed by a triangle. It is sometimes interpreted as representing the eye of God watching over humankind (or divine providence).

Imagery of an all-seeing eye can be traced back to Egyptian mythology and the Eye of Horus. It also appears in Buddhism, where Buddha is also regularly referred to as the "Eye of the World" throughout Buddhist scriptures and is represented as a trinity in the shape of a triangle known as the Tiratna, or Triple Gem.

the eye (vortex) encased (formed) by three non material forces , charge, field and rotation symbolised as a triangle

the electrical nature of our universe was discovered some 150 years ago prompting awareness of our physically existing non material dimension

confirmation that the eye (vortex) was indeed the prime archetype (effect) of power (quatity/scale) throughout our universe manifested after 1923

In 1923 Edwin Hubble determined the distance to the Andromeda Nebula, and found that it could not be part of the Milky Way, so defining that Milky Way was not the entire universe, and making the two separate objects, and two galaxies. However, the first galaxies seen would be all of the naked-eye galaxies, but they were not identified as such until the 20th century

how far back in time was it when humankind (us) discovered the vortex at the center of galaxies and we possessed awareness of it`s role within each galaxy