Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology

time to be ghetto gay

man, I watched the moon a long time last night...I take notice of it every night I can see it...but last night it felt more electric than I have ever noticed...it was beautiful, I always look at it with one eye!

I noticed that too.

Wonder if the sun solar flares have made an impact on the moon?

Thread: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology (Page 283)

early evening yesterday on a walk our moon was the thinnest of crescents lying on it`s back
not only was the full outer circle of the moon aglow but it`s entire face was blotchy light and dark thus i could clearly see the whole of our moon
it was staggeringly obvious to me
i stood on the sidewalk looking at it with hundreds of people not looking at all and came to the conclusion there was no reason to tell them or anyone because there was no interest
they are occupied with other matters at the moment

Full Moons Get Electrified by Earth's Magnetic "Tail"
[link to news.nationalgeographic.com]

"And just as the wave packet in the atom is trapped by the combined electric field from the nucleus and the rotating wave, the Trojans are trapped by the combined gravitational field of the sun and orbiting Jupiter."

It appears, then, they are stating that electromagnetism and gravity are exactly the same things even though they do not put it in such blunt terms. The vague article takes a roundabout way but insists that the "trojans" positions and characteristics are the same as atomic i.e., EM, phenomena.

The big question to ask is why did they not reflect this premise in the title? Instead they titled it very vaguely and not on point. The point, in my opinion, is that their findings, which are quite interesting, demonstrate that EM "mimics" the physical effects of gravitation, in context of orbiting bodies. This is quite profound a finding in a laboratory --but this goes unmentioned and unarticulated outright. The reader is left confused and wondering what just happened. Unless the reader scrutinizes the article more closely, the thrust of EM = gravitation is lost. Read it again. It correlates EM with gravitation literally. That is not only giant but profoundly huge.

So.... why the omission of this conclusion? Something that profound warrants full and clear disclosure.

New calculations explain past observational findings of many asteroids orbiting earth in the past. Earth briefly captures asteroids orbiting the sun, making them into mini-moons that orbit earth. Jupiter's electric field stabilizes the orbit around the sun of trojan asteroids, with a planetary electric field. Likewise and most certainly scientists should conclude that earth's electric field is capturing these small asteroids orbiting the sun, giving them stabilized orbits around the sun and letting them go when the forces balance. Furthermore, this means that all asteroids orbiting the sun are analogous to electrons having charge, with orbits stabilized by electric fields of jupiter, earth, and all planets. Our old large "4 billion year" old moon is the large part of this coma shaped electron cloud surrounding the earth

[link to www.youtube.com]

I think a lot of those satellites (or what ever they are) are actually caught on film and cited as ufo's...

You're so quiet...

yes i became quite

She'll be back...

whos she?

..........During a two-centuries passage from the historical ages that are termed Bronze and Iron, roughly in the years 850 to 650 B.C.E., there occurred an immense set of happenings to the Earth and its People. Every sphere of existence was demonstrably affected suddenly and intensively.

The exoterrestrial origin of this undeniable quantavolution can be argued plausibly and, furthermore, attributed to the planet Mars in large part. Not simply but profusely, it is iron that conditions the Iron Age and it is of Mars, conveyed catastrophically to Earth.

Every quantavolution, of which at least five occurred from the recent birth of the human species up to this Martian Age, or Martia, has introduced a sudden, intensive change in all aspects of existence covering measurably the whole Earth. The entire Jovean planetary system becomes involved, including an actively transforming plasmasphere.

In the Greater Mediterranean Region upon which we focus our study, all basic spheres of natural and human activity are obviously impacted. The astrosphere, the geosphere, the anthroposphere, the psychosphere, and the theosphere are among them. Change was holistic.

Scarcely any landscape or village, including its inhabitants, escaped ruin from the material and gaseous fall-outs, the lightning, the fires, the earthquakes, the volcanism, the tsunami and flooding, the land's rising and sinking, the climatic changes, the hurricanes, and the plague. Those humans who survived changed or remade their gods. A majority of people were forced to migrate or chose to wander. They fought countless battles for territory, for possessions, for their culture and gods, and out of sheer madness...........

s a spiritual searcher I have noticed a new phenomenon. As my mind swims in the direction intent guides I find at the moment Iv´e thought there nothing more to find I see knowledge appear I thought not previously there. This brings up the question again of time lines. Can a collective wish change present reality? Anyone else hold knowledge of this sort.
Time is a strange unknowable thing. Or so it appears. In regards to technology of time where do we stand?
Retrocausality says this is possible.


Retrocausality, Time Travel, and Quantum Physics

March 14, 2007 – 4:52pm — bexIf that title didn’t bore the pants off of you, then the rest of this blog will!

The San Francisco Gate recently published an amazing article on retrocausality, which is the idea that things we do in the present go backwards in time to affect the past.

Naturally, many scientists think its silly to think you can go back in time: that would require something to go faster than the speed of light.

Plus, what about causality? Say I got my hair cut today. Then say I went back in time to yesterday to burn down my barber’s place (no offense Scott, its just an illustration). Would my hair instantly grow back?

In general, this debate is between Einstein and his General Relativity fans, and the Quantum Physics fans. The former say time travel and faster-than-light travel is impossible, because that leads to incredibly weird paradoxes and a breakdown of causality.

The Quantum Physics folks basically reply, “Boo hoo! We’ve been dealing with incredibly weird paradoxes and a breakdown of causality for a hundred years… AND we’ve invented the laser, the computer, and superconductivity. What do you got?”

As you may have guessed, I side with the latter camp…

I am glad to read about a fearless quantum physics geek who may actually be able to prove time travel on a small scale is possible.

Boring physics experiments aside, the article goes into detail about the possibility that there is nothing strange at all about retrocausality. Quite possibly, time travel happens every day in small ways, and we are just not aware of it.

My hero, Richard Feynman, famously noted that a positron behaves exactly like an electron traveling backwards in time. Others have expanded on his observation with very interesting results. Perhaps these particles even go back in time all the way to the big bang, to affect the fundamental nature of our universe!



[link to bexhuff.com]



Have others noticed the more we move to the belief in 2012 the more things are happening? The more you focus the more ancient history information seems to be materializing. The whole ancient aliens thing.

[link to washer_method.com]

Yes the Enuma Elish is the oldest epic record, but in terms of ANE studies it is quite young - Babylon was a far cry from the lives and practices of the Sumerians. There was a vast array of snake cults dotting what is now Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran. The Transtigridian Snake Gods came from the Choga Mish plain in Northern Iran, not Mesopotamia. Tiamat is not necessarily a snake god, but she is described as being a dragon or chaos monster in Babylon. Arabia was also known for having a huge array of snake cults for which evidence was almost completely wiped out for all useful purposes due to Islam.

I think it's safe to say that even if El Shaddai (god of Shaddai, god of Abraham) wasn't a snake god there are some interesting parallels, one, he is a mountain god, Ningishzidda who is the son of Ninazu the "grand physician" is called "Hero, lord of field and meadow, lion of the distant mountains! Ningišzida, who ... Hero who, after surveying the battle, goes up to the high mountains!" in the balbale to Ningishzidda which is Sumerian. (See Balbale A: Link)

Tiamat was the mother of all the gods - Anu is considered to be the king of all the gods, but he is third generation!

Links to these gods are all over the bible - Bethlehem for example is probably named after Lahmu, one of the monstrous children of Tiamat, "the muddy one" who fathers Anshar and Kishar (An and Ki, sky and earth) so this may give you some perspective on just how old Tiamat is...how far reaching....

Anything to do with chaos monsters, from hydras to dragons are all the mark of Tiamat.

1-10. Hero, lord of field and meadow, lion of the distant mountains! Ningišzida, who brings together giant snakes and dragons! Great wild bull who, in the murderous battle, is a flood that ……! Beloved by his mother, he to whom Ningirida gave birth from her luxurious body, who drank the good milk at her holy breast, who sucked in lion's spittle, who grew up in the abzu! August išib priest who holds the holy ešda vessels, checker of tablets, who secures justice ……! King, wild bull with tall limbs (?), who directs speech aright, and who hates wickedness! Mighty power, whom no one dare stop when he spreads confusion! Mighty Ningišzida, whom no one dare stop when he spreads confusion!.....

she never went

as in that was not my reason for quite
thoughts and sensations of those thoughts occupied my attention

were they emotional?

i never got that far

consumingly so

thats a little confusing because you said you knew who she was and I think you said both of you met in 2007? Or do you mean you never got that far in the telling? and are you supposed to tell or does that come about another way? And good gawd...WHEN?

sorry for so many questions

thats a little confusing because you said you knew who she was and I think you said both of you met in 2007? Or do you mean you never got that far in the telling? and are you supposed to tell or does that come about another way? And good gawd...WHEN?

sorry for so many questions