Awesome!!! Speaker Boehner Says NO New Restrictions on Firearms

Why do so many people in America drool over violence? And why is it necessary for gun stores to sell rounds that can pierce through kevlar? I mean what could a person possibly use that for that doesn't involve killing others?

Why do so many people in America drool over violence? And why is it necessary for gun stores to sell rounds that can pierce through kevlar? I mean what could a person possibly use that for that doesn't involve killing others?

One have to be creative using guns...lol

Everything these cocksucker politicians do,

is designed to make THEM stronger,

and the lowly citizen weaker.



I'm sick to death of this bullshit. This "government" is everything the founders DIDN'T want for this country.

yeeeeeee haaaaaar great stuff i thanks me gona gits me a couple a glock 18s and wigg me some nigboe's




silly arse stupid country

"We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions." ... Ronald Reagan

FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE

1. "Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not."
-- Thomas Jefferson

2. "Those who trade liberty for security have neither."
-- John Adams

3. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.

4. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.

5. Only a government that is afraid of its citizens tries to control them.

6. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control.

7. You only have the rights you are willing to fight for.

8. Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety.

9. You don't shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive.

10. Assault is a behavior, not a device.

11. 64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday.

12. The United States Constitution - v1791. All Rights Reserved.

13. The Second Amendment is in place in case the politicians ignore the others.

14. What part of 'shall not be infringed' do you NOT understand?

15. Guns have only two enemies; rust and politicians.

16. When you remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves.

17. The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.





"armatissimi e liberissimi" said Machiavelli. If democracy is about freedom, if power is the best way to obtain it, and weapons grant you the greatest power (the ability to defend or take lives when necessary), then why would you trust a small group of society with that power? How are they really better than a "law abiding citizen" in holding that huge amount of power, and what entitles them to protect and take lives as opposed to the rest?

Why do so many people in America drool over violence? And why is it necessary for gun stores to sell rounds that can pierce through kevlar? I mean what could a person possibly use that for that doesn't involve killing others?


If people are trying to kill you, you should have any type of bullet in order to kill them first. Don't like it? Move to Canada.


Whos trying to kill me? Whos trying to kill you? There are no enemies at my gates. The sooner we rid ourselves of violence, the sooner mankind will actually progress into a peaceful future. I am not against owning a gun. If you want one because you live in a bad neighborhood, fine. Go get a license and buy a handgun. But I dont understand why people feel the need to have fully automatic assault rifles in their home with armor piercing rounds locked and loaded.

Why do so many people in America drool over violence? And why is it necessary for gun stores to sell rounds that can pierce through kevlar? I mean what could a person possibly use that for that doesn't involve killing others?


Any high power rifle can easy take out a vest. Stop watching t.v and listening to the media and go about your life.

You got armor pericing, Full metal jacket, and other alloys that can punch the vest even from a .223. Why do think there are so many lawsuits and recalls on vest over the years???


I dont watch that much TV except for hockey and HBO because their shows are amazing. I hate the media because most of it is controlled by capitalist illuminati pricks. I am a very active person and I read a lot, so dont speak to me like a sheeple.


Just as I figured, you're a communist. That explains your anti-gun stance.


Im not completely anti gun. I just feel that certain types of weapons should be more heavily regulated. And if a person has a violent history or is mentally unstable, they should not be allowed to purchase a weapon. In many ways I find guns fascinating. I love seeing some people's gun collections, especially WWII ones.





Yo... DIPSHIT...

It was an ordinary Glock 9mm that was used by the psycho. There wasn't any kind of unreasonable weapon used. Once again, you demonstrate that you have your head up your ass.

The biggest threat to this country isn't guns. It's the kind of IDIOCY that you are putting on display right here in this thread.


I actually stated that if a person has a mental history which he did, you should not be able to purchase any sort of weapon. Thats just my opinion. Just because you disagree doesnt mean you have to attack my character and flex your muscles.





I'm sick to DEATH of you STUPID motherfuckers. It has nothing to DO with "flexing my muscles". It has EVERYTHING to do with being SICK AND TIRED of having to defend my rights from ignorant fucking maggots like YOU. It's like dealing with a retarded 5 year old, and get REALLY REALLY REALLY OLD!!!

People like YOU are BY FAR the biggest threat to this nations freedom.


Haha ok. I'm a "threat to this nations freedom" I love that line. Me and my evil communist boogie men are going to take over and rule the world muhahahaha! It's like living in the 50s all over again. You people should read more. Goodnight.

:mtop:



Everything these cocksucker politicians do,

is designed to make THEM stronger,

and the lowly citizen weaker.



I'm sick to death of this bullshit. This "government" is everything the founders DIDN'T want for this country.


+1

It appears that they have forgotten that they are public SERVANTS...they serve us, we DON'T serve them.

I don't agree with what happened to Rep. Giffords as I abhor senseless violence BUT if what happened makes Congress aware that the public is disgusted with their holier than thou actions then perhaps it should be viewed as a wake up call for them.

Enacting laws against the citizenry to elevate Congress will only further the divisiveness and anger of the populace.

It is time for Congress to remember their role as SERVANTS of the public and gain humility.

Why do so many people in America drool over violence? And why is it necessary for gun stores to sell rounds that can pierce through kevlar? I mean what could a person possibly use that for that doesn't involve killing others?


If people are trying to kill you, you should have any type of bullet in order to kill them first. Don't like it? Move to Canada.


Whos trying to kill me? Whos trying to kill you? There are no enemies at my gates. The sooner we rid ourselves of violence, the sooner mankind will actually progress into a peaceful future. I am not against owning a gun. If you want one because you live in a bad neighborhood, fine. Go get a license and buy a handgun. But I dont understand why people feel the need to have fully automatic assault rifles in their home with armor piercing rounds locked and loaded.

Any rifle round will penetrate kevlar. If you want to ban "armor piercing" ammo, you have to ban all hunting ammo. Kevlar only stops handgun bullets.

Why do so many people in America drool over violence? And why is it necessary for gun stores to sell rounds that can pierce through kevlar? I mean what could a person possibly use that for that doesn't involve killing others?


If people are trying to kill you, you should have any type of bullet in order to kill them first. Don't like it? Move to Canada.


Whos trying to kill me? Whos trying to kill you? There are no enemies at my gates. The sooner we rid ourselves of violence, the sooner mankind will actually progress into a peaceful future. I am not against owning a gun. If you want one because you live in a bad neighborhood, fine. Go get a license and buy a handgun. But I dont understand why people feel the need to have fully automatic assault rifles in their home with armor piercing rounds locked and loaded.

Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) is rejecting gun-control legislation offered by the chairman of the Homeland Security Committee in response to the weekend shootings of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) and 19 others in Arizona.

Rep. Pete King (R-N.Y.) announced plans Tuesday to introduce legislation prohibiting people from carrying guns within 1,000 feet of members of Congress.

King, who has previously called for the removal of illegal guns from the streets, made the announcement alongside New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, one of the nation’s loudest voices for stricter gun laws.
King said the legislation is not intended only for the safety of government officials but also to protect the public. He said elected officials are not necessarily more important than constituents, but by protecting them in this way, they would feel safer in meeting federal officials at public events.

“The fact is they do represent the people who elect them, and it’s essential, if we’re going to continue to have contact, that the public who are at these meetings are ensured of their own safety,” King said.

King’s legislation got the cold shoulder from Boehner and other Republicans after it was announced.

Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said the Speaker would not support King’s legislation.

The office of Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said the majority leader is reserving judgment until the King bill is finalized.

“Mr. Cantor believes it’s appropriate to adequately review and actually read legislation before forming an opinion about it,” Cantor spokesman Brad Dayspring stated in an e-mail.

The immediate rejection of King’s legislation by Boehner illustrates the difficulty gun-control advocates will face in moving forward with any legislation.

Even Capitol Hill’s most ardent gun reformers don’t anticipate any changes to the nation’s gun laws will be forthcoming in the 112th Congress. They say the combination of a GOP-led House and the powerful gun lobby is simply too formidable to take on over an issue that’s become a proverbial third rail of Washington politics.

“Anything you can get through the gun lobby is going to have little consequence,” Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.), a longtime supporter of tightening Second Amendment restrictions, said in a phone interview. “I don’t see the likelihood of much progress — I don’t see much hope.”

[link to thehill.com]

Thats definitely not bay-ner....its boner.

Changed how it sounds when he got into politics so its not boner.

Like Coal-bert and Coal-Bear.

Why do so many people in America drool over violence? And why is it necessary for gun stores to sell rounds that can pierce through kevlar? I mean what could a person possibly use that for that doesn't involve killing others?


If people are trying to kill you, you should have any type of bullet in order to kill them first. Don't like it? Move to Canada.

Because the Second Amendment says we can. Don't like it? Move to Cuba.


Actually it says we can have them if we are in organized militias. Our society has evolved past an organized militia if I'd say so myself.


Wrong, in the Supreme Court case of DC v Heller, the court held the 2nd Amendment is an "individual" right that has nothing to do with "militias". In Chicago v McDonald, the Supreme Court held that the 2nd Amendment is a "fundamental right," just like the right to free speech. Don't like it? Move your commie ass to China.



JAR HEAD, I DON'T HAVE 2ND AMANDMENT IN FRONT OF ME BUT DOSN'T IT STATE WE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A FIRE ARM AS TO BE READY WHEN THE MILITIAS CALL.? MIGHT BE THE OHIO LAW.

Rep. Pete King (R-N.Y.) announced plans Tuesday to introduce legislation prohibiting people from carrying guns within 1,000 feet of members of Congress.




This is the part that pisses me off.

.

DID HE CRY

-----------------------------------------

well thats all he could do in light of the
new 'tone down the rhetoric' campaign.

apparently, harsh words were out of the question

.