Elenin fails to perturb a small asteroid at 0.002 AUs distance

Astronut, you are really one of the only people bringing actual facts to this site. I appreciate every post you write. i feel like you teach me things. you're a very smart individual and i really dont see why ppl call you a shill. most likely they are the shills.


keep doin what you do dawg.

Facts? No one can or has explained all of the Earth changes that have gone on in recent years, this guy is a total schill, he has nothing.

BUT ELE! NIN! 9/11!

ITS NOT FAIR! I WANT ELENIN CONSPIRACY AND DOOOOOOM!

yes, facts. every here of them? i dont see him trying to explain earth changes, i see him giving actual FACTUAL evidence about a comet that ppl "predict" will hit earth. Do you understand the difference? Astro knows his shit, unless you can prove me otherwise, YOU are the god damn shill

So how would you explain the Earth changes over the last year or two?

the Earth is in constant change....so what's your point? it damn sure has nothing to do with that comet. but if you want to hitch your ride on it - we are not going to stop you. hell i might even pitch in to buy your track suit.

I'm the only one here that has given the true facts on this thread in my previous post in this thread.

That asteroid has a 94% chance of not being affected by comet Elenin because it has a 94% chance of not being iron based. Instead it has a 94% chance of being nothing but a rock with a minute amount of iron.

The Earth is iron based and can be affected magnetically.

You are a complete dipshit, he has not offered a single thing, what facts are you referring to that can be proved?

I'm the only one here that has given the true facts on this thread in my previous post in this thread.

That asteroid has a 94% chance of not being affected by comet Elenin because it has a 94% chance of not being iron based. Instead it has a 94% chance of being nothing but a rock with a minute amount of iron.

The Earth is iron based and can be affected magnetically.

I'm the only one here that has given the true facts on this thread in my previous post in this thread.

That asteroid has a 94% chance of not being affected by comet Elenin because it has a 94% chance of not being iron based. Instead it has a 94% chance of being nothing but a rock with a minute amount of iron.

The Earth is iron based and can be affected magnetically.

ummm, can you read? did you attempt to read the very first post in this thread? go ahead and try again.

Come on dick for brains, bring on your best, I'm ready to....

no need to argue the point....we will get our answers soon enough and of course i will be forced to plant another on one more EPIC DOOM FAILURE!

ummm, yeah, i can read, so far i have not seen any facts presented here this evening, again i call astronut a schill presenting nothing but BS. What say you?

you're assuming way too much. thats the difference btwn ppl like you and astronut. he actually backs his claims up with proof

do you have ANY explanation as to why its BS? i still haven't seen any reason to believe otherwise. you seem set to call him a shill regardless of his post.

Astro has not given any proof whatsoever that he knows if the asteroid is magnetic or not. There is scientific proof that 94% of the space rocks out there are not iron based, therefore the small asteroid has a 94% chance of not being affected by Elenin. This statement is scientific fact.

PIN this thread. I admire facts from real observation! It can bring us closer to the truth.

Now I have two more questions left

1. The asteroid is very dim. The sky is full of objects with 19 apparent magnitude everywhere. Can you double check it's RQ176? For example, taking two shots at different time to show RQ176 is actually moving and not a remote star. Once we have such photos, we can settle the dispute over Elenin's mass once and for all.

2. How Elenin causes M8+ earthquakes still remains a mystery.

I want to say again, it's hardly a coincidence. Elenin happens to have very small inclination 1.839°, so it can form a straight line between planets and the Sun.

M8+ earthquakes are very rare, but there were M8.1, M8.8, and M9.0 in the past four Elenin's alignments. There are only thirty M8+ mega earthquakes since 1975 (35 years), all of the last three M8+ earthquakes happened in Elenin's alignment!. The probability of random events is near 0. We still need an explanation!!!

USGS database search:
[link to earthquake.usgs.gov]

PDE 1975 05 26 091151.50 36.00 -17.65 33 8.1 UKPAS 6D. .T.....
PDE 1976 01 14 164733.50 -28.43 -177.66 33 8.2 UKBRK .D. .T.....
PDE 1977 04 21 042409.60 -9.97 160.73 33 8.1 UKPAS 7C. .T.....
PDE 1977 08 19 060855.20 -11.09 118.46 33 8.0 UKPAS .C. .T.....
PDE 1980 07 17 194223.20 -12.52 165.92 33 8.0 UKBRK .F. .T.....
PDE 1985 09 19 131747.35 18.19 -102.53 27 8.0 MwHRV 9CM .TS...M
PDE 1986 05 07 224710.87 51.52 -174.78 33 8.0 MwHRV 6DM .T.....
PDE 1986 10 20 064609.98 -28.12 -176.37 29 8.3 MSBRK .FM .T.....
PDE 1989 05 23 105446.32 -52.34 160.57 10 8.2 MsGS 5FM .T.....
PDE 1994 06 09 003316.23 -13.84 -67.55 631 8.2 MwGS .CM ......S
PDE 1994 10 04 132255.84 43.77 147.32 14 8.3 MwHRV 9CM .T....S
PDE 1995 07 30 051123.63 -23.34 -70.29 45 8.0 MwGS 7CM .T....S
PDE 1995 10 09 153553.91 19.06 -104.21 33 8.0 MwHRV .CM ST....S
PDE 1996 02 17 055930.55 -0.89 136.95 33 8.2 MwHRV .CM .T.....
PDE 1998 03 25 031225.07 -62.88 149.53 10 8.1 MwHRV ..M .......
PDE 2000 11 16 045456.74 -3.98 152.17 33 8.0 MwHRV .CM STS...S
PDE 2001 06 23 203314.13 -16.26 -73.64 33 8.4 MwHRV 8CM .T....S
PDE 2003 09 25 195006.36 41.81 143.91 27 8.3 MwHRV 8CM .T....S
PDE 2004 12 23 145904.41 -49.31 161.35 10 8.1 MwHRV .FM .T.....
PDE 2004 12 26 005853.45 3.30 95.98 30 9.1 Mw01100 9CM STS...M
PDE 2005 03 28 160936.53 2.09 97.11 30 8.6 MwHRV 8CM 3TS....
PDE 2006 05 03 152640.29 -20.19 -174.12 55 8.0 MwHRV 7CM .T.....
PDE 2006 11 15 111413.57 46.59 153.27 10 8.3 MwGCMT 4CM .T.....
PDE 2007 01 13 042321.16 46.24 154.52 10 8.1 MwGCMT 6FM .T.....
PDE 2007 04 01 203958.71 -8.47 157.04 24 8.1 MwGCMT .CM UT....S
PDE 2007 08 15 234057.89 -13.39 -76.60 39 8.0 MwGCMT 9CM .T....M
PDE 2007 09 12 111026.83 -4.44 101.37 34 8.5 MwGCMT 6CM .TS....
PDE 2009 09 29 174810.99 -15.49 -172.10 18 8.1 MwGCMT 6CM .T.....
PDE-W 2010 02 27 063411.53 -36.12 -72.90 22 8.8 MwUCMT 9CM UTS....
PDE-Q 2011 03 11 054624.12 38.30 142.37 29 9.0 MwUCMT XCM STS...M


If Elenin has tiny mass, I can only think of some possibilities

[Hypothesis A] TPTB HAARP/X37-B it whenever it forms an alignment. Elenin is a psyop

How to verify it:
Understand the mechanism of HAARP in full and find relevant measurements to detect it.

[Hypothesis B] Elenin is static charged like Comet NEAT (2002-2003) may be, too (a strongly charged comet seems not rare):

[link to www.thunderbolts.info]

Pity that Comet NEAT has 81.7° of inclination (it can never form a line between Earth and Sun), so we cannot use it as a reference.

Coulomb's force is multiple magnitude stronger than gravitational force, so a tiny object can possibly exert strong Coulomb's force on Sun. Comet NEAT is very tiny compared to the Sun, but it caused a giant CME.

In this case, Elenin can influence Sun (composed of plasma), but cannot influence a asteroid (composed of rock)

This can possibly explain the earthquakes caused by Elenin's alignment

"Perhaps the observation of Nobel Laureate Hannes Alfvén, the father of plasma cosmology, can put the issue in context. It was his opinion that coronal mass ejections are caused by a breakdown or breach of the Sun’s double layer—an event that provokes an explosive exchange between the insulated plasma cell of the Sun and the plasma of surrounding space."

How to verify this theory:
a. Observe the Sun. The plasma composition on Sun's surface may be influenced.
b. The attraction from Sun to Elenin may induce small changes to Elenin's orbit. (to be calculated later)
c. There will be a Magnetic Field from Elenin near Earth in late Sep and early Oct. (but it's already too late to find out)

What it implies if it's true:
the influence by Elenin on Sun in late September will be (3.1/0.6)^2 ~= 26.7 times of Mar 11, 2011

[Hypothesis C] Elenin has strong magnetic field

How to verify it: I don't know

[Hypothesis D] Just a BIG coincidence! As you can see the M8+ listed in the past 35 years, the probability is very low.

I'm not an astrophysicist, so i really can't fight you on that, but you're still assuming way too much, and you're numbers dont really match up. just bc this asteroid is not iron based does not mean it has a 94% chance of not being affected. that makes no sense AT ALL. if you could break it down further id be more willing to believe you.