RED ALERT! ELENIN VISIBLE FROM AUCKLAND! ITS COMING! ***RED ALERT***

Where is it now


For more footage

The bottom one is not it. That is something different, looks like a plane that one.

The NZ ones are amazing though eh

Category: Science · Comments: 541

Planet X (or Nibiru) is not easy to get dead. Although I have often been explained in detail why it is not possible, because that opens some previously unknown planet, to destroy the Earth in 2012. Nevertheless, the Internet is still full of people who say exactly that and I keep getting requests, in which I am asked to explain how this is really for now with Planet X.

It's actually not difficult to discover for themselves what is going on. To determine whether there can be this Planet X or not, one must not have studied astronomy. You must be a math genius, not a computer programmer. It is completely sufficient, to remind themselves of what one has learned in school. And of course you have to be willing to think for themselves. Let me demonstrate once all the details of how it would be possible in principle each, answer the question of the Planet X to clear for themselves. Without in any YouTube videos and Internet forums have to trust - and as a bonus, you can learn the same even the basics of celestial mechanics!

The article is getting a little long. But only because I've tried to explain everything in detail so and simply as possible. It happens one or the other formula in the text and, together with the length deters some might. But who wants to understand why it can not be Planet X - and really understand himself - the pass rate I keep reading until the very end.

What do we know?

Let's start with the on what exists on the "facts" about Planet X. If you limit yourself to that all the reports together, it is not much left. But it is enough for us:

1) Planet X moves with a period of 3,600 years around the sun.
2) Planet X is located throughout most of its orbit away from the sun and comes close to Earth only once every 3600 years.
3) Planet X is coming in December 2012 near the earth again.

Point 1 is taken) the "research" by Zecharia Sitchin, who has the whole story until Nibiru-conceived. It is based mainly on his imagination and hard on real facts but the orbital period of 3600 years, in the worldview of the Planet-X-fans fixed. Point 2) follows logically from the fact that we have seen until now no one Planet X. He must, therefore, are on a path on which he is only briefly near the ground and otherwise far out in the solar system where we can not see it. And point 3) is the reason why is ever such a fuss made about Planet X - when he allegedly on 21.12.2012 should collide with the earth, then nobody would be interested in it, too.

This looks like poor information, but it is sufficient to reconstruct the orbit of Planet X. For this we need only two things to remember that we - have learned in school - hopefully. Once these are the Kepler's laws from physics or astronomy education. In the short version, they are (I'm straight from the Wikipedia assumed , since most will certainly look up there and even dig out any old school books;)):

1st Kepler's law: The planets move in elliptical orbits, is the sun at one focus.
2nd Kepler's Law: A planet between the sun-drawn "driving beam" sweeps out equal areas in equal times.
3rd Kepler's Law: The squares of the orbital periods of planets are as the cubes (cubes) of the semi-major axes.

The very first law tells us something very important: can not move any planet! They move in an elliptical orbit around the sun. So now we have to find out how the elliptical orbit of Planet X looks like. For this we must now not only to remember the physics lessons, but also in mathematics. At some point we have learned there, which is an ellipse. Otherwise, we again ask Wikipedia that has a detailed response . For us it is important that the shape of an ellipse is defined by two numbers: their semi-major axis and eccentricity. The semi-major axis is a distance and it indicates how large the ellipse. The eccentricity is a number between 0 and 1 and tells us how the oval is an ellipse. A circle would have an eccentricity of zero - but we already know from the second point of our "facts" list that may be the orbit of Planet X is not a circle but must be strong oval. Something like that might look like this:

ellipse1.jpg

In its point closest to the Sun Planet X is very close to her, so close that it is also close to the earth. But then he moves back far away and with most of the time far away from the sun.

How long is the orbit of Planet X?

Let's try now time to determine the semi-major axis. The only value we have is the orbital period of 3600 years. This, however, totally, because we can use the third law, which speaks explicitly of the orbital period. Now we can not get past a small bill, but do not worry, it is not difficult. One can mathematically the third law in different ways to write. I've held back on the Wikipedia. The very first one finds the formula does not look quite so wild, so they use:

kepler3.png

This is explained:

The squares of the periods T 1 and T 2 of each pair of satellites around a common center are proportional to the cubes of the semimajor axes a 1 and a 2 of their elliptical orbits.

T 1 is therefore the orbital period of the first celestial body, so we at Planet X. It is 3600 years. 1 is a semi-major axis of Planet X and they figure out what we want. T 2 and a are two semi-major axis and orbital period of any other planet. Take the best soil that we know well. Their orbital period (T 2) is known to be a year and its semi-major axis (a 2) are we back at Wikipedia : 149.6 million kilometers. Of the four numbers in the formula we know now that is three and can easily calculate the fourth. Let's tap the numbers into a calculator to our choice - for example this one - and then we see that the semi-major axis of the orbit of Planet X must be enormous 35.14 billion kilometers. Such large numbers are a bit unwieldy. At best, we compare it to the semi-major axis of the earth, then we see that the semi-major axis of Planet X is 235 times larger is. In astronomy, we use the length of the semi-major axis of the earth's orbit as a standard way for a separate unit of distance, the Astronomical Unit (AU). The semi-major axis of the earth's orbit is so long just one AE, with the orbit of Planet X, there are 235 AU.

As oval is the orbit of Planet X?

Now we know the semi-major axis. But what about the eccentricity? Let us remind ourselves again to this "fact" from the first list number 2: Planet X comes close to Earth every 3600 years. This means that the point closest to the Sun in its orbit must be about as far away from her, as the earth itself so one astronomical unit. If we know the distance of the Sun's closest point from the sun and in addition the semi-major axis, then we can easily calculate the distance of the aphelion point. Let's take it again at the picture from above:

ellipse2.jpg

The image should not really explain itself. The whole ellipse is twice as long as the semi-major axis, ie 235 + 235 = 470 AU. The length of the ellipse is also the same as the distance between aphelion and sun the next point. Which in turn is of course identical with the sum of the distance between the sun and the aphelion point and point sonnennächstem and sun. We need to subtract from the 470 AE only 1 AU - the distance from the Sun's closest point of the sun - and immediately see that the AE 469 sonnfernste point must be far away. This is really far away neatly. Pluto, the former was once the most distant planet is at its aphelion point far only 40 AU away.

We also see in the image that the train is so elliptical, the more diverse the distances of closest to the Sun, and aphelion point. If two values are exactly equal, then the sun would be exactly in the middle of the track and a circle - and its eccentricity is zero. Depending on approaching the sun at the point nearest the sun moves, the greater the eccentricity. So there must be a correlation between eccentricity and give the distances of the closest to the Sun / aphelion points. So we better ask Google - the search engine and we suggested that Wikipedia aufzuschlagen to this page . There we see a simple formula that allows us the eccentricity of the orbit of Planet X to calculate:

apsisformel.png

With the "Apoapsis" the aphelion point and meant with the sun next periapsis point is, we can read about at the beginning of the article. So we put one, then we see that the eccentricity must have a value of 0.99574.

And that's it! We now know that Planet X is moving on a path whose ellipse is a semi-major axis of 235 AU and an eccentricity of 0.99574 must have. We've found a handful of simple calculations and some basic school knowledge. But we can do even more! We can now see yet exactly where Planet X is currently in the sky and how bright it would appear there.

As moves Planet X?

Our aim is indeed to check whether Planet X may exist or not. That is why we now want to always check to see exactly where the planet in the sky should be. Because then we can easily see for themselves whether he is actually there or not. But how do we do that? We could go to the library and read thick tomes on celestial mechanics. Which are full with long mathematical formulas, with some of them can calculate also be as far away Planet X at the moment just from the world without exception. But these formulas are not for the fainthearted and even me sometimes too much (and I am, after all celestial mechanic!). Fortunately, there is an easier way. Nowadays we have computers and the Internet, and both offer us the opportunity, the motion of celestial bodies easily and without much knowledge of mathematics to simulate. A similar search on the Internet brings us quickly to a program called Celestia . Leaves with him to visualize the movement of the planets in the solar system (and it's open source, as there is no danger that the evil world conspiracy and experimented in the source code). The program is free and installs quickly. Now we can look at how the earth moves, Mars and all the other planets, asteroids and comets in our solar system. But of course, Planet X is not there. We need to somehow install a new planet in Celestia. The Wikipedia articles on Celestia informs us:

"About 10 GB of extensions (so-called add-ons) are necessary to complete the basic program is available. This enormous amount is the result of the activities of a small but very productive user community that supports the program. The largest collection is from the portal" Celestia Motherlode "(see links) is provided. (...) It also offered for science fiction fans have been developed which simulate universes from popular movies like Star Wars or Star Trek, but also own planetary systems devised without reference to a movie or book. "

Hand-crafted planetary systems! Exactly what we are looking for! So on to "Celestia Motherlode" , and there at best equal to the department "Fictional" . We are lucky! There we find an entry titled "RS Planet X - Nibiru v1" on one of the zip file link. We invite them down and open it. This is an archive file, unpack several files. One of them is called "ReadMe.txt" and when we read them, we know exactly what we must do so in the future, Planet X, Celestia displays: simply set the whole bunch of files in the folder "Extras" folder in the Celestia (the probably at C: \ Program Files \ Celestia is located) and copy ready. Now contains our solar system and the Planet X and we can look at how he moves.

The first thing we notice is likely, how enormous is the train actually elliptical. If we zoom out so far that we can see the train is complete, the entire known solar system has shrunk to a small point. Yes but now we want to see if it actually comes to an encounter with the Earth. Coils so times before and after we see what happens 2012th Nothing - Planet X is because that is not at all close to the earth: (Hmm - what now we look best on me, what this Planet X is that we as just installed a car and whether that is identical with the one we have calculated above. So we open the "PlanetX.ssc" file (otherwise, are indeed only jpg images in the folder) and see first lots of stuff that happens we may somewhat cryptic, depending on whether we know of Celestia . or have not But a few things might look familiar to us - for example the lines:

EllipticalOrbit
{
Period 3600
SemiMajorAxis 236
Eccentricity 0.9917

Period, Eccentricity, Elliptical Orbit: You have not even English can, to understand that this is about the elliptical orbit of a planet and its eccentricity. And a shorter look to the dictionary confirms that "SemiMajorAxis" stands for the semi-major axis. The values entered here are true, but now actually not consistent with those we have calculated above. So we replace it! When we carry SemiMajorAxis "235" and at the Eccentricity "0.99574". In the following lines are still more numbers under the keywords: dip, AscendingNode, ArgOfPericenter, MeanAnomaly, Epoch and albedo. What do they mean that? This can be accompanied by a translation and a Google search to find out: it is the remaining orbital elements . As we can see from the Wikipedia, these are six numbers that define the orbit of a celestial body clearly (who just wants to know, can read what I here have written about the orbital elements). It really is pretty clear that with semi-major axis and eccentricity were not ready yet. Because the place so fixed, only the shape of the elliptical orbit - but still know nothing about how this ellipse is oriented in space. Since the space has three dimensions, we also need a logical, three angles, the situation must be clearly stated. These are the inclination (inclination), the nodal length (AscendingNode) and the argument of periapsis (ArgOfPericenter). And of course we must also specify any where in the planet on the ellipse is currently located. This can be done with the middle Anomalous (MeanAnomaly). "Epoch" and "albedo" have nothing to do with the train itself, the period is simply the time specified, for which the values were calculated and albedo describes how well the planet reflected light.

We are interested but only used the train. The values for eccentricity and semimajor axis we have now been corrected - but how will we know what values should we register with the three angles? Good question - you could probably play around again with the complicated formulas of celestial mechanics, the tomes and calculate exactly how to look like the angle, so that a path is created, exactly on the Planet X on 21.12.2012 the earth comes close. But we want to avoid, so we use a different approach: We just try around until we have a suitable track! We use first four missing numbers (Inclination, AscendingNode, ArgOfPericenter, MeanAnomaly) to the value "0". For the inclination which is even more plausible and a good value. Because they are on so, how much the orbit of the planet is tilted toward the Earth's orbit. And the orbits of other planets are all so good as not inclined - it's a good assumption, first visit Planet X assume that the orbit is not tilted. If we can once again run our simulation, we see that Planet X is at its point closest to the Sun while the Earth's orbit is near, but not near the Earth. To change this, we need to turn the car in the plane of Earth's orbit, and that until her next point exactly where the sun is, where is the earth on 12/21/2012. The corresponding angle is the argument of periapsis (ArgOfPericenter). In order to make it a little easier, I did the same to me a couple of Planet X tinkered copies and sent them all on the trip (I've also deleted the same throughout the moons were also defined in the file PlanetX.ssc - You can also leave it playing no role). All had the same values for the orbital elements, only the figures for the argument of periapsis I've changed. Leaving aside all these planets then run together in Celestia, you can see also beautiful, the impact of a change in periapsis argument on the train:

pericentervariation.png

If you change the scale a bit, then it looks like this:

pericentervariation2.png

So now you can change the angle and on, the train continues turning and the sun sometime next point ends up exactly where the Earth is on 21.12.2012. When I was at an angle of 90 degrees true. So now is the day in question at the meeting point on earth - Planet X but not yet. So the time comes, we need to change the mean anomaly. So I changed the values back and looked to see what number fits best. We note here again soon, the impact of the second Kepler's law. Planet X is on its path away from the sun, then it moves so slowly that you know to speed up the time to have a really strong movement. Near the earth but he flutscht by a mad pace. It is therefore not surprising that we find here the really precise value for the mean anomaly must, because the period in which there is Planet X in the vicinity of the earth is so short that it really just Timen do if they should meet exactly at 12/21/2012. Here is a picture with three copies of Planet X on identical cars, only their mean anomaly has changed - (the figures are 150.08, 150.09 and 150 085 degrees) and the minimal. Nevertheless, the planets are at very different places:

meananomaly150.08-150 085-150.09.png

After a little trial and error, I finally landed at a value of 150.08815 degrees for the mean anomaly. This seems to be optimal - is now Earth and Planet X exactly meet on 21 December 2012. At 6:55 CET to reach its minimum distance of 2.5 million kilometers. You come together not - but that was clear. For we are indeed assumed that the point closest to the Sun should be the path of Planet X at exactly 1 AU, then at the height of the earth's orbit. If we want a conflict, we should have placed the Sun's closest point of the orbit of Planet X in an area that lies within the Earth's orbit. Only then can the two orbits intersect. But the list of "facts" at the top speaks only assume that the two planets come close, not even the same conflict. After all, Planet X is supposed to come every 3600 years and in previous encounters, they are not colliding. The convergence of such a large planet to a few million miles of Earth would be enough but in reality, to let it be on earth a little uncomfortable. The great planet would disturb the massive train and who knows where the earth would end up at the end - it may well be that they all fly out of the solar system or collide on their new car with the sun or any other planet.

planetx-treffen.jpg

Our first goal we have achieved. We made it through simple calculations and a bit of trial and error on the computer, find out which path Planet X should have. Celestia shows us now for any time when the planet is just. So that for example, currently (August 19, 2011) looks like:

planetx-heute.png

Planet X is currently so far been within the cross-track and Saturn will soon be the orbit of Jupiter - only if it exists, of course. Thanks to Celestia, we can now also see that we change the distance between Earth and Planet X over time. We need only in Celestia Planet X and select the information to the left above, show us the distance to the current position. So we zoom in as close to the earth as it is now possible, and if we let time run faster, we can see exactly what changes the distance. I have the time here in the coming months, until December 2012, recorded:

Distance Planet x.jpg

Jeez, take a breath Aussie Anon, you'll live longer ;)

Here's the latest update from Mythi, the Andromedan ( [link to www.youtube.com]

(1) Elenin is in two parts, but the parts are traveling together and will still align with the Earth around Sept. 24-26. Expect major Earth Changes (quakes, volcanoes) at this time, kicking off the "quickening."

(2) These Earth Changes will continue through October 17, the closest passage of Elenin's leftovers. After these leftovers pass us, we will be hit by Elenin's tail. This will bring with it masses of meteorites, most of which won't reach the Earth. What they will do, however, is to knock out large numbers of satellites, which will mess up communications and everything else that runs off satellites. This will accelerate the process of social breakdown and chaos begun by the Earth Changes.

(3) Nibiru (which Mythi just calls "the Dwarf Star") will arrive behind Elenin in early November. It's unclear when it will become visible. But regardless, it will cause a geophysical pole shift no later than December, finishing the process of TEOTWAWKI.

Good luck to us all if this is correct ...

I havent read all this thread. I posted this here for Tauranga


Tauranga
Offer Upgrade
User ID: 1548394
New Zealand
09/13/2011 04:11 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: GABI'S EARTHQUAKE FORECASTING CENTER
Hey Kiwis one of you asked about the sights and video from Auckland. Well this has been posted on Urban Survival site

[link to urbansurvival.com]

Comet Visible?
A reader sent me this interesting picture sequence under the heading "Comet now visible N. Texas" and noted it was about 280º degree bearing from his place.


The pictures wont copy but have a look . It looks like the same thing to me.
Quoting: Agapao 1547690

Hi agapao,
Thanx heaps. Could u please put this on the 'auckland' thread for comparision with other pics.
We need to hurry up and figure out what this is coming our way.
I see a need for urgency because its getting bigger.
And i figure that the way the paid shills attacked, especially with all that horrid racial stuff and other constant derailing, that we do have something going on here.
And i have learned, by coming to GLP that i'm not the only kiwi to notice changes in the skies.

[link to urbansurvival.com]

Sorry try this

Well the feeling of 'something' coming is becoming palpable to more people every day.

What i wonder about this object coming that can be seen from auckland and other places is:

Is it part of the reason for the 'feeling' that is growing?
I mean can we 'feel' it coming?
Because many of the population who know nothing of what is going on in our skies, still can feel the 'something' coming to our planet.

Thanx heaps agapao.

I thought some people might want to compare with the others.
Have u seen keep smiling's new nz volcano thread?

No I haven't I dont spend much time here on GLP anymore I have moved elsewhere to another place that discusses more things that I am interested in. But I check in at least once a day (if possible) on Gabriel and NiNzrens threads I find them most informative. I am going to read this thread and will look at Keep Smilings one. Thanks for the links.

No worries, thanx for your help too.

See u soon om one thread or other.

i dunno if u heard but nin had a bad accident..search the forums for the info...apparently she will be ok but it was pretty bad....just lettin ya know...pc

I second that.

Hi there,
Yeah us kiwis heard about it quick because the thread about it started in our evening time, when we were all on GLP

Lots of love and prayers to nin

Have u seen the latest video above, it has a plane in it as well as the object and they dont look the same.

Hey guys i thought u might like to look at the off shore and pacific quakes as they show on our seismos

[link to zl2tod.net]

Ok now there is a thread to observe nz volcanoes and quakes.
Aussies and anyone else most welcome to post any off shore nz, kermadec, pacific and arctic quakes u may come across when u are looking at quake sites etc.

Thread: Volcanic watch for NZ volcanoes

Thread: Solar Flares / Earthquakes / Local Fluff & Bubble / Nibiru / Elenin / Neutronstar / Brown Dwarfs / Dangers of Nuclear Devices / Matrix / NWO /Fun

Thank u, that looks interesting.

So many threads with the info now

::lala:bsflag:

You obviously havent seen the vids

Lens flair....

[link to s1087.photobucket.com]

[link to s1087.photobucket.com]

[link to s1087.photobucket.com]

[link to s1087.photobucket.com]

Lens flair in negative...

[link to s1087.photobucket.com]

This is the first time Ive seen this thread.
Any determination on what this is?

Hi junie,

Do u mean the object that gets filmed from auckland, or do u mean my groovy lens flair or whatever it is?

they are planes

The original video, that winged thingy?