WHY HAS SIRIUS A BEEN REMOVED FROM GOOGLE SKY? The Hopi Prophesy. The Dogon. Nibiru.

Thread: I know why is SIRIUS blocked on google sky but WTF is THIS ???

Here you go, had to switch to my computer but going back outside with phone :) Thanks again for your help!

Wonder what Astro will say now? lol

[link to www.youtube.com]

So with Sirius being a binary star system, could this possibly be happening? What would this do to us, if anything?

Interesting stuff. Subbing to read tomorrow, too much info while I'm this tired.

This----> Thread: Tracking Nibiru throughout history

Sirius is an incredibly bright star. So much so that it completely over-exposed the film plates used by the Palomar Sky Survey, which is where the "censored" image comes from. The "censoring" was to remove or block the part of the film emulsion that would expose the central part of sirius. The diffraction spikes and some of the glare is still there, but you can make out far more stars closer in to Sirius than you otherwise would. Bear in mind this was before the days of CCDs and digital imaging, so they couldn't just shut off individual pixels precisely and cleanly. Doing this though allowed fewer stars to be obscured by the glare of Sirius.

Here's a comparison image I made using the original source data from the individual film plates, which you won't find at a secondary source of sky survey data like Google Sky. First up is the familiar "censored" image:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
Now here's an "uncensored" image using the same telescope but with film plates that did not obscure the light from Sirius at all:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
Note how many more stars are drowned out by the light of Sirius in the second image.

Ding ding ding, we have a winner!

I actually laughed when I read this. All other images have been removed huh? Hard to find huh? Well then how do you explain all these?
[link to www.flickr.com]
[link to www.flickr.com]
[link to www.flickr.com]
[link to www.flickr.com]
[link to www.flickr.com]
I could go on.

Like i said to the previous poster this is an absolutely RIDICULOUS statement. WHY WOULD THE LESSOR STARS AROUND SIRIUS A BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN ONE OF THE HOLIEST STARS IN OUR SKY? Why would a plethora of "lessor stars" be SO important that Sirius A is removed from GoogleSky and other sky observing programs? Answer me that smart guy. Also, why don't you enlighten us all tell us WHY there is photographic evidence of RIPPLES on Sirius A's surface? See pic top of page 5.

The problem with you Astro is your arrogance. You ARE NOT the authority and able to deduce an opinion that has any GREATER value than anyone else. Period.
Explain the ripples AND give me A GOOD explanation why Sirius A has been removed. Not a ridiculously stupid one about how it was TOO bright to see the stars around it. Sirius is one of the HOLIEST of ALL the stars in our sky. No one cares about the lessor stars around it.

My reply to the first posted question:

"No. It has been removed for a purpose. To hide it.

If you go to Google earth, click "constellations" then go to Leo, Sirius will be the "Dog Star" to the lower right. You can see that Sirius A is no brighter in the grand scheme of the overall picture than any other large star. As a matter of fact, you have to zoom WAY in, in order to see that the image of Sirius has been removed at all.

You will also see a blue satellite aimed directly at Sirius A. Satellites are VERY expensive. Why would "they" build and launch a satellite to look at one specific system then remove nearly all the image from all sky viewing software and the internet?"

Last Edited by Seer777 on 10/11/2011 03:36 PM

Believe it or not, astronomers don't regard Sirius as "holy." We don't care what you think. What you call "lesser stars" are of more importance than a star that is already extensively studied and documented. The only thing "missing" is pure image saturation in the missing region.

It wasn't removed from google sky, google sky chose to use a pre-existing sky survey plate from which it was masked in order to reveal stars that were previously drowned out by Sirius' glare.
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

The other stars are only "lessor" in your mind. To someone who wants to compare their position in the future to their position on an older sky survey plate, they are very important, moreso than Sirius itself.

I don't see any evidence of "ripples on Sirius A's surface." I will point out that you can't see Sirius' "surface" in the pic at the top of page 5, though I know I'm casting pearls before swine in even bothering to mention that fact. It's clear that it would be beneficial for you to spend more time studying the fundamentals of astronomy before leaping to such ridiculous conclusions. I know you're not going to bother though.

Funny, I feel exactly the same way about a person who thinks he "knows" that there's a conspiracy to hide something about one of the most-watched stars in the night sky, despite countless amateur and professional astronomers who have seen the same star countless times already and even the specific image in question, from the original source, when the person doing the conspiracy mongering doesn't even realize where the image actually came from or when it was taken, let alone why it would be of interest to astronomers to see more stars near Sirius.

I'm not here to make this personal, let alone appeal to my own authority, but it took you no time to make it a personal argument. Want to go there? Fine, let's go there. My 16 years of experience doing amateur astronomy have clearly given me greater ability to form an informed opinion on the image in question than you.

That's not why you're wrong of course, so much of what you said is just plain factually false, but since you felt the need to make the claim that I'm not able to deduce an opinion with any greater value than anyone else regardless of how factually incorrect the other person is... well, sorry charlie, you're wrong.

Already done.

Insult my analysis all you want, it only speaks to your own severe and overwhelming ignorance. I know what I'm talking about, and it's not ridiculous at all.

Sorry, I don't subscribe to your Sirius worship, astronomers don't care what you think. Sound too arrogant, too cold hearted to you? Too bad. You falsely attribute what your religious beliefs would dictate you to do over what an astronomer would do.

Wrong, completely and totally wrong. You clearly do not understand astronomy or astronomers. Yes, we do care about what you call the "lessor stars."

There's so much ignorance and so much wrong with this statement that it's hard to even know where to begin in tearing it apart. The visible light imagery on google sky does not come from any satellite, you do not have any evidence that any satellite in the visible light imagery was "aimed at" Sirius, only that it passed close to Sirius in the sky from the perspective of the telescope at the time the image was taken on the ground. That is utterly meaningless.

The satellite does not know or care where it is in the sky relative to some random telescope on the ground. When ISS passes in front of the sun or in front of the moon from the perspective of an astronomer on the ground who's filming it, do you think the astronauts notice anything different or realize that they're whizzing in front of the moon or sun for a split second? No, of course not! It's entirely dependent on the observer's position! From the perspective of an observer a hundred miles away at the same time the image was taken, that satellite was nowhere near Sirius in the sky!

Furthermore, you have no idea what kind of satellite it was or if it even had so much as a single camera on board. It could have been a package of science experiments having nothing to do with cameras, or a navigation satellite, or a comm sat, you have no way of knowing without more information.

Last, but not least, if you're depending on google sky and similar programs to access sky survey data, you're only demonstrating a lack of good research skills and profound ignorance. These are second hand sources of pre-existing sky surveys, they're also lower quality than the originals, and they don't let you see additional film plates that in this case would show what Sirius looks like "uncensored" - see above. No serious researcher uses these programs for that purpose.

You still did not answer the question. WHY HAS SIRIUS A BEEN REMOVED FROM GOOGLESKY? The answer you gave is what YOU believe to be true doesn't make it true. Also, whether or not you believe Sirius A to be Holy has nothing to do with the REVERENCE MANY other cultures place upon it.

Further more...I just asked a question and a small one at that. Did you read the REST of the thread or just decide to go off and try to dilute the MEANING of this thread with conjecture and arrogance?

Honestly, I don't really care why it has been removed. It is COMPLETELY beside the point. 99% of the first post on this thread has NOTHING to do with the removal of Sirius from Googlesky. It is a lesson on the Hopi and Dogon, which if you had read it, being a 15 year astronomer, should be at least a LITTLE impressed that the DOGON was able to not only DESCRIBE Sirius B but ALSO perfectly represented it's DNA orbital pattern THOUSANDS of years BEFORE Sirius B's discovery.

Does that not intrigue you being an astronomer as you say? How do you explain this?

Look I don't want a fight Astro. I believe you could have said your bit without being arrogant and rude in your tone. Sirius A's removal is just a TINY fraction of what is included in this thread. You should try to reading it in it's entirety instead of gazing at the first image and disregarding everything else. I asked a question because I didn't know. The rest of the thread is history and mythology. Next time, don't throw out the baby with the bath water.

Peace.

Last Edited by Seer777 on 10/11/2011 05:18 PM

SEER... I too regard planets as HOLY - so much that we see in other dimensional realities is HOLY - the Hopis and other races had the gift to see and so they understood so much more. .Their understanding of the finer realities and their wisdom is something we should respect. The Australian aborigine and the Dogons and most indiginous people are on the path to protect the land they belong to because they understand the inter connectedness of all life.It is so much a part of their culture.
Indeed Sirius is holy...
Just remember you are dealing with materialistic minds and no-one of that ilk can even begin to understand where you are coming from.
I am also the same mind set as yourself - It is useless to argue with scientific minds.
Let Astronaut continue on his way .
He feels he has all the answers.
We know what we know and that is of great comfort to the more spiritually minded ones on this site.

Thank you. I really appreciate you words. Stay golden.

I don't know why they do what they do, I just placemark it when I see it. Like their moving black cutout. lol

I don't either. Which is why I asked the question and not a statement. However, it feels like it's been removed to hide something. I could be wrong but I still have yet see a GOOD explanation why it is missing. IMHO.

I will attempt to find the other Skywatching program image of the "mysterious missing Sirius" and put it here. Give me a few.

Dude, all the major programs like google sky all draw their data from the same sky survey sources and all show the same problems, which is why no serious researcher uses them to access sky survey data. They're not "skywatching programs," they're web based stitched mosaics of pre-existing sky surveys. If you want an "uncensored" image you go to the sky surveys and find a plate that isn't censored yourself, like I did above.
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
I guess you didn't want to address my points in my last post which is why you deleted it, so I'll ask again. Why were the Dogon's wrong about the number of stars in the Sirius system (there is no Sirius C, as was once thought, and as was claimed to be a prior prediction by the Dogons)?
[link to adsabs.harvard.edu]
[link to adsabs.harvard.edu]
Why do the Dogons not appear to actually believe what it was claimed that they believe regarding Sirius?
[link to www.philipcoppens.com]

Last Edited by Astromut on 10/11/2011 09:26 PM

I have attempted 3 times to reply to your question and GLP is NOT posting my reply. Until next time.

In less than 40 hours, in Egypt's time zone the week inverse to the 21-28 of December this year of our calendar will commence.

Chew on that bone, dog stars.

"Alice Bailey believed that The Earth and the Souls of the Earth are connected to and constantly building a Rainbow Bridge called the Antahkarana between Heaven and Earth, as well as an internal Rainbow Bridge of the Soul and the Chakras. Accoring to Bailey, the Dog Star Sirius is one of the most influential energies affecting our Solar System in guiding the process of building this Rainbow Bridge. The picture on the left shows a Masonic Tracing board showing The Two Pillars of Freemasonry and the Stairway to Sirius [Stairway to Heaven] -the Blazing Star of the Masonic tradition."

I think there is a lot more to it than that, though.

Hello fellow humans,
I have a few questions after watching the videos at the beginning of this post.
1.Is there a model that shows Nibiru/Planet X coming anywhere near Earth on the famous day of 21/12/12?
2.If google decided to blank out sirius because of it's "brightness", where can I see it unmasked?
3.I can understand the word ELENIN=Extinction Level Event Nine
but from where do we get the name Nibiru?

1)Not yet as there is no Nibiru or Planet X give the promoters time to make up a few.
2) [link to i319.photobucket.com]
3)Someone's Uncle I think

Finally.

Eternal thanks.

I have been waiting for a real image of Sirius since September.



Last Edited by Seer777 on 01/29/2012 02:48 PM

Don't use photoshop!

Haha...I figured that out the same day. Stellarium became a close friend during the month of September.



:virgosept30b:

Im confused, so what does that mean ?

The rainbow bridge comes from Alice Bailey ? I would like to hear more about it if you wouldn't mind. I've heard bits and pieces and don't really understand it yet. From what I understand though it has something to do with st.louis MO and possibly the Gateway arch. Do you know anything about that ?

sure you can see sirius with binoculars,but you can see more than sirius with google.Yes you would need a telescope to see more. If you were allowed to see what you were looking for ,it would confirm the Hopi text or dispell it,in which case we would be looking at there distraction or not...

cant have everyone freaking out,or not, can we?

"souls of distortion awakening"all about sacred geometry. and yes it is very enlightening

to mark my place